I bought a camera flash on ebay for $30 from a Chinese seller. It was supposed to be the higher end model, but they sent me the lower end budget model.
Now, when mistakes happen, I'm more than willing to ship items back so I can get the correct item I ordered. However, in such cases, buyers are the ones that end up at a loss because they have to pay for the return shipping costs. When sending items back cost a considerable chunk of what you paid, you end up having paid more for the item than you should have. Why should the buyer be punished for the seller's mistake? It's frustrating, but this is how it works with eBay and Paypal, and there's no way to negotiate your way around this directly. As soon as you mention that the item isn't as described, they know you have the item, and you pretty much either have to just keep it or send it back at your cost.
So my question is, what do you do in this kind of situation? Do you or do you think it's OK to just say the item was never received to get your money back and buy again from another seller? Or would you send the item back at your own cost out of moral obligation?
****Keep in mind that I'm ONLY talking about lower value items here (less than $30?), where I think the seller CAN take a bit of a loss for their mistake. If the item is of higher value, things are changing into buyer fraud, and it's not right.
In the past, I've done this with small items from China that were faulty. I didn't want to take any chances so I just said it was never received. I'm not condoning this kind of behaviour. I don't want to have to do it, but the system leaves me with no other choice. If the seller makes a mistake, there's no reason why the buyer should be out of pocket for that mistake. If anything, the seller should be the one out of pocket.
Seems as if you're just a liar and a thief.
Why not actually message them and find a resolution rather than lying to them, getting a refund etc
And doesn't paypal offer free returns…