Hi
I have a peculiar scenario …
For arguments sake of I earn 100k$ and the tax rate is 50k$
My accountant says I have to cough up the 50k$ to tax man …which I feel is unfair .
According to him I have to concentrate more on increasing that 100k $ income …. But my point is if income increases their is a proportional increase in tax !!! Say if I work hard and make 200k$… The tax may proportionally increase to 100k$ (hypothetical assumption, am not quoting the actual rates by ato…)
I have asked him some tax minimisation strategies and only thing he said was put more money in super combine super with partner and or buy a negative geared property , having a family trust … And he says that's the only option available ….!
I am but concerned with that advise … What do you guys reckon ?????
Poor advice. Companies give better protection/liability control over sole traders. The family group taxes would be identical under both structures.
Name one. Tax laws are designed to see function over form. There is not a single deduction available to a company that is not available to a sole trader operating the same business model. Actually there is… the ASIC annual review fees that you have to pay for being a company.
True. So now the profits are trapped in the company, how do you get them out? Do you realise there are personal taxes at the marginal rates for dividends and directors fees?
It's pretty obvious you don't have any accounting background and I'm guessing you've heard these anecdotes from family/friends. Please stop giving totally false advice to people on accounting and tax matters.