Ford Mustang 2015 from $44,900 (Ecoboost) and $54,990 (V8), Order Now for Dec 2015 Delivery

Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:02
Last edited 06/03/2015 - 10:00

Moved to Forum: Original Link

The fantastic all-new Ford Mustang is coming to Australia in late 2015. Pricing has just been released and it is about 10k less than most pundits were expecting, especially the awesome 303kW V8.

2015 Ford Mustang pricing (plus on-road costs):

  • EcoBoost Fastback manual – $44,990
  • EcoBoost Fastback auto – $47,490

  • EcoBoost Convertible auto – $53,990

  • V8 Fastback manual – $54,990

  • V8 Fastback auto – $57,490
  • V8 Convertible auto – $63,990

If you want to get one of the first batch (Dec 2015 to Feb 2016 delivery), you need to put a deposit down at a Ford dealer by this Friday, otherwise you could be waiting almost 2 years to get one as demand will almost certainly outsrip supply. Shop around though as some dealers are dodgily trying to charge 5k dealer delivery…should be around 2k at most!

Brochure with more details, colours, specs:
http://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/31870/28951/mustang_201…

Also see this article for more info:
http://www.caradvice.com.au/339971/2015-ford-mustang-pricing…

I personally think the V8 is the way to go as it will be more fun to drive, hold it's value better and has that awesome V8 engine note. Oh, and it does 0-100 in 4.4s……yeeehaa! I cannot think of any other sub 100k sports car that is this quick.

Some might call it a poor man's Ferrari, but I reckon it look's pretty cool and is awesome value for what you get.

PS> if you haven't seen the Mustang Speed Dating video on youtube, check it out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nyr1Ao7iZA

Automotive

Related Stores

Ford Australia
Ford Australia

Comments

  • 51ngh on 05/03/2015 - 11:04
    +4

    Announcement only. Belongs to forums.

    • thebargainhunter on 05/03/2015 - 11:05

      Isn't it a significant saving compared to when they were last available?

      • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:21
        +2

        Yes that's why I posted. I feel a lot of anti Ford sentiment here. Ah well, those people will be missing out.

        • RockyRaccoon on 05/03/2015 - 11:43
          +9

          ???? How would Anti Ford sentiment people be missing out?

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:01
          +2

          @RockyRaccoon:
          By not having a good look at this car. I reckon it is more of a performance car bargain than the Toyota 86, as it gives you awesome looks and awesome performance. And I'm not just saying that because I work for Ford, I just think this car is fantastic value. Look at the specs and see what I mean.

        • RockyRaccoon on 05/03/2015 - 12:11

          @billy_bob: If someone is anti ford, then they are not missing anything if this post was removed. But maybe it's my understanding of english which is at fault here.. :)

          i.e. the ones to miss out would be the pro ford or ambivalent people…

        • shadowarrior on 05/03/2015 - 12:11
          +3

          @billy_bob: And again. Toyota 86 =/= same target market/genre of a Mustang fan. At least take the initiative to learn which cars are direct competitor to the new Mustangs.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:27

          @shadowarrior:
          They are pretty close in price, especially if you consider 86 is pretty basic in features, whereas Mustang is fully loaded. I would say potential 86/BRZ buyers should definitely take a look at the Mustang.

        • Mikinoz on 05/03/2015 - 12:38
          +6

          @billy_bob: 10k+ pretty close in price umm no, you sound like a car salesman

        • GooseHoward on 05/03/2015 - 12:38
          +6

          @billy_bob:

          Close in price? The V8 is 20 grand more than an 86 GT

        • shadowarrior on 05/03/2015 - 12:39

          @billy_bob:
          I have not driven the new Mustang yet (hah captain obvious!) but I have taken both the 86 and BRZ out on a spin. They handle pretty good. Not just yeah, handles like a car, but the steering is nice and zippy and its fun taking them up some twisties.

          Mustangs on the other hand, didn't have a good rapport about their handling. One I did drive was a brilliant and powerful straight line car. And that's about it. Take it out on some twisties and you better be wearing yellow underpants because they handled like shit.

          Unless there is some drastic change to the suspension, and from the specs it looks like its a good upgrade but not any thing exceptional. So from the theory and data published, it looks like a good driveable car. But it still has a lot of distance to cover to be as nimble as either the Brz or the 86. One of my cars is a FTO GPvR. Yeah it has mods bla bla, but even stock, FTO's handle like they are on rails. That car has a special place in my garage for those nice spirited weekend runs up mountains for some steak for lunch with the Mrs. Untill I buy another snappy sports coupe, a muscle car won't be replacing it.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 13:49

          @AMG:
          The Ecoboost is about 8k more than 86 GTs, has a lot more power (233kw vs 147kw) and a lot more equipment, and looks much better in my opinion. I would pay the 8k extra as I think it is 8k well spent.
          By the way, I am not a car salesman, I am an engineer.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 13:52

          @AMG:
          The 86 GT is not a V8…..

        • GooseHoward on 05/03/2015 - 16:29
          +5

          @billy_bob:

          Of course it's not a V8. But you mostly talked about the V8 mustang's performance, so that was what I compared it with. And the Ecoboost might have more kW but it also weighs 1600kg

          Either way comparing base model to base model is 11k difference. It's not that close, though you are correct in that the Ford has better luxury features

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 16:46
          +1

          @AMG:
          You can't really compare base model to base model because the Mustang Ecooboost has pretty much the same features as the V8 except for the V8 engine and Brembo brakes. Which means the Ecoboost, even though it is the base model Mustang in Australia, is specced far above the top spec 86GTS, which is $36,500.
          From Car Advice article: "and there’s a long list of standard equipment including dual-zone climate control, 8.0-inch SYNC2 media touchscreen with satellite navigation, smart key with push-button start, auto lights and wipers, leather trim, heated and cooled front seats, electric driver’s seat adjustment, and 19-inch alloys"
          Read more at http://www.caradvice.com.au/339971/2015-ford-mustang-pricing…

          So the actual difference of $8500 is probably justified.

          Agreed the Mustang is a larger, more expensive car, but they are both sporty 2 doors that will appeal to similar customers, and for me the 8.5k extra for the Mustang Ecobbost vs 86 GTS would be money well spent due to:
          1) more power/performace
          2) nicer interior
          3) more tech fetaures
          4) nicer exterior
          5) Mustang has heritage, 86 not really

        • striker5950 on 05/03/2015 - 20:18
          +7

          @billy_bob: its not all about specs and performance figures, its the feeling the car gives you when you drive it, there was an article done by top gear few years ago when the 86 came out, it compared the 86 to the top exotics from the aventador to the 458 italia, and audi r8 to the 911 turbo s, it came out on top as the most fun to drive car regardless of price. so I think that says something.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 22:14
          +1

          @striker5950:
          OK fair point, I have never driven 86 and not really interested to be honest as it is way too underpowered for me. I'm sure the 86 has great handling that would be fun on a track, but in everyday driving you never get to explore those limits, whereas V8 power and sound can be enjoyed every day.
          I'm not saying the Mustang is for everyone, but it is another sporty option for people to consider. It is great that we have these sort of fun cars to choose from that are within reach of the average person, not just the rich.

        • striker5950 on 05/03/2015 - 22:17
          +1

          @billy_bob: yeh good point, I also think the 86 is underpowered in a straight line myself, unless you slap on a turbo charger kit for 5-6 Gs. id like to see the gt500 bought to aus when ever it's announced, now that's something to be excited about

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 23:08
          +2

          @striker5950:
          yes, but if you slap on a turbo kit, you lose your warranty, so you might as well buy an older Supra or 300ZX turbo or Nissan GTR.

        • StalkingIbis on 06/03/2015 - 00:03

          @billy_bob:

          i think this is a far comment…someone who wants a sporty car like the 86 will definitely enjoy a v8 mustang too. id look at it for 8g more!

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 06/03/2015 - 00:12
          +1

          @Calam05:
          Actually the Ecoboost is 8k more than 86 GTS, the V8 is 55k so that is about 18k more.
          But thanks mate, I'm copping a few negs but I stand by what I said. Value is not just about what is cheapest, it's what you get for the dollars paid.

        • Shadowsfury on 06/03/2015 - 07:17

          @billy_bob:

          As an 86 owner, the only inclusions per the car advice article that the mustang has which the 86 doesn't is auto wipers and 19 inch alloys (vs 17)

          So no I don't necessarily think its justified. That $8500 is enough to put a turbo into the 86 which would boost power to beyond the mustang

          I just think you can't see the point that people are trying to make that the mustang simply isn't for everyone.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 06/03/2015 - 09:26
          +6

          @Shadowsfury:
          Correct me if I am wrong, but Toyota website says 86 GTS does NOT have:
          - powered seats, heated/cooled seats
          - Sync2 (voice activated Sat Nav, entertainment and climate system)
          - keyless entry
          - perimeter alarm
          - tyre pressure monitoring system
          - SOS post crash alert system (automatically calls 000 in case of serious crash and gives them vehicle coordinates so Ambulance can arrive ASAP)
          - heated mirrors
          - HID headlamps
          - LED tail lamps
          - rain sensing wipers
          - MyKey (can limit the power and set traction control in case someone else is driving)
          - illuminated scuff plates
          - 9 speaker sound system (86 has 6 speakers)
          - auto dimming rear view mirror
          - etc, etc….

          Have a look at Mustang specs on the Ford brochure, you will be surprised how well specced it is:
          http://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/31870/28951/mustang_201…

          I'm not saying Mustang is for everyone, but it should be on the shopping list of anyone looking for a sporty 2 door car, as it gives you a lot for the money, and looks great.

        • timohill on 06/03/2015 - 10:08

          @billy_bob: 86 no heritage? Now, I know you have no idea what you're comparing the Ford to. Give it a rest.

        • GooseHoward on 06/03/2015 - 10:38

          @billy_bob:

          GTS has keyless and HID, but not the other stuff IIRC

        • zeomega on 06/03/2015 - 11:15

          @shadowarrior:

          ROFL. FTO and the words "Handle like they are on rails" do not belong together. You need to drive some better cars. FTO's handling is average or slightly above average.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 06/03/2015 - 11:59

          @timohill:
          Please enlighten us all on the heritage of the 86. Mustang has been around 1964 and is recognised globally as an iconic muscle car.
          And what do you base your automotive knowledge on? I am a Product Development engineer with almost 20 years experience in automotive, so I think I am qualified to comment.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 06/03/2015 - 12:18

          @AMG:
          Yes, sorry, 86 does have HID headlights (but they call it Xenon).
          But I still can't see any reference to keyless entry, and by that I mean you can leave your keys in your pocket and the car senses when you get close and automatically opens the doors.
          Maybe an 86 owner can confirm.

        • jackary on 06/03/2015 - 13:15
          -2

          @billy_bob: Oh please, now you're just being over the top. It's these days recognised as a car that's past its use by date, to an actual Mustang enthusiast, FAR too long. They should have let it die. Called it something else. The point I'm making here is there is NO heritage. Its a car made for fools who know no better, or care about little more than 0-100. The only thing I'm going to be thinking as I see one drive past is 'jeez, that fella must be having a crisis'. As has been said I'm sure, if its heritage you're after, get a proper Mustang.

        • GooseHoward on 06/03/2015 - 14:03
          +1

          @billy_bob:

          Definitely keyless, I drove a GTS the other day

          The 86 has some heritage in being the successor to the AE86 models of the mid-80s

        • John Dough on 06/03/2015 - 14:10

          @billy_bob: you would have to spend 50K more to make an 86 go close to a 4.4!

        • AngryMan on 06/03/2015 - 14:15

          @striker5950: I've driven an 86 and it is not even as good to drive as a golf GTI let alone a top exotic. Top Gear along with most other journo's were simply riding the 86 hype bandwagon when it came out.

        • jzx100 on 06/03/2015 - 15:26

          @AngryMan:

          I've driven both, both are shit cars!

        • shadowarrior on 06/03/2015 - 16:24

          @zeomega:
          Not sure if you have actually driven a maintained FTO or taken a FTO out for a spin which has the 16 year old original suspension. And I have driven enough 'enthusiast' cars to make that claim.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 07/03/2015 - 07:36
          -6

          @AMG: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_AE86
          I would not call that heritage…..more of a seedy past. Corolla Levin, really, how can you call that heritage? That thing was ugly, underpowered and not capable of raising a pulse. The ONLY thing going for it is it had RWD.

        • chuie on 07/03/2015 - 11:58
          +2

          @billy_bob:

          Good work bashing on a car based on wiki alone.

          How does this help promote the Mustang anyway? I get its powerful and bang for your buck in some ways, but it's a different car to the 86. it's silly to say one car is better than the other

        • May4th on 07/03/2015 - 21:36

          @billy_bob:
          AE86 has more street racing heritage than two decades of american automotives put together. it's quite the embarassing statement to make

        • ShirokaZe on 07/03/2015 - 23:07

          @billy_bob:

          86 Manual GT - 29,990 + ORC
          EcoBoost Fastback manual – $44,990 + ORC

          I think your maths is broken mate.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 07/03/2015 - 23:22

          @ShirokaZe:
          Check the specs, then get back to me. Even the top spec 86 GTS, at 36,500, is well below the Ecoboost in specs, power and looks.
          Wait until you see this car in the flesh, it is stunning. The 86 may be a nice car, but it lacks the power and presence that I want from a sports car.

        • shadowarrior on 08/03/2015 - 04:04

          @billy_bob: For the FTH TIME!!!! A Mustang is not a peeeping sports car! Geezuz! :|

        • goraygo on 08/03/2015 - 08:05

          @AMG: dude, you know the AE86 was a Corolla?! It is not a heritage. By hey just reused the name.

        • goraygo on 08/03/2015 - 08:08

          @goraygo:

          I've driven a 86 and I drove a 200SX back then. 86 is seriously underpower. The handling of 86 is very similar to the 200SX.

          So when I compare, 86's handling isn't that well comparing to a 10 years old Nissan. Then the turbo just killed it.

          Mustang looks good. Hope it handles well

    • cloudy on 05/03/2015 - 18:59
      +3

      This an announcement of a advertisement? I think this should pay ozbargain for the eyeballs.

  • thebargainhunter on 05/03/2015 - 11:04
    +14

    Must let Sally know…

  • [Deactivated] on 05/03/2015 - 11:06

    WHAT IS THE DEAL?
    DO I GET A FREE CAR?
    SPAMMMMMMMMMYYYY POST

    • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 14:46
      +13

      Hi tuzii, the main reason I posted this is so people can get their order in by Friday if they are interested, so they can get delivery in the first batch (Dec 2015 to Feb 2016), otherwise there could be 6-12 months wait (from Feb 2016) as Australia is only getting a limited allocation of Mustangs. I am guessing that demand will far outstrip supply.

      I don't understand why I am getting negged so much, when I have provided so much information. As one of the few people in Australia that has seen this car in the flesh, I can tell you it looks stunning and the quality will be far better than any previous Mustangs. I am pretty sure it will be considered a performance car bargain in years to come, and that is why I have put a deposit on one myself.

      • haoxuee on 05/03/2015 - 19:57

        hi.. so did you get a driveway price for your car from dealer yet ? … ford website says $60,123 driveway for v8.. are we paying that price or whatever the dealer says ?

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 22:04
          +1

          Not sure but dealer quoted me $60,300 but with the optional premium wheels which is $500 extra, so I am happy with that.

  • teasatotalling on 05/03/2015 - 11:07
    +4

    Advertising

  • The Value on 05/03/2015 - 11:07
    +1

    the Toyota Mr2 is a poor mans Ferrari. Not Mustang.

    • thebargainhunter on 05/03/2015 - 11:08
      +4

      Incorrect. The MR2 is just poor ;-)

      • bhm133 on 05/03/2015 - 15:01
        +10

        Mr2 owner here. Very sensitive about my poor man's ferrari….

  • SydBargainer on 05/03/2015 - 11:09
    +3

    No discount. Nothing free. Not even free shipping.

    Get yourself over to the forum.

  • A3Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:09

    Not a bargain.

    SPAM

    Six reports already.

  • shadowarrior on 05/03/2015 - 11:10
    +3

    Mustang and Ferrari cater to different genre of car enthusiasts, the fact that you are associated with a dealer and yet don't know this difference earns you a facepalm from me….and a negative for not being a vote but advertising your dealership.

    • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 22:37
      +1

      Hi shadowarrior,

      I have nothing to do with any dealership or Ford sales. I am a Product Development Engineer at Ford and have worked on the Falcon, Territory, Ranger, upcoming Everest and others, so I know a bit about cars. I never said Mustang is comparable to Ferrari, I said it may be called by some people a poor man's Ferrari, much like the MR2 was years ago. However, having seen the Mustang in the flesh, it has a lot more WOW factor than the MR2 did, and also a lot more power. Thee V8 Mustang has 303kw and will do 0-100 in about 4.4 seconds, whereas the MR2 non-turbo did about mid 7 seconds IIRC. For comparison, the Ferrari California does it in 3.6 seconds, but costs a cool $460,000.

      By the way, I know 0-100 is not the only thing to consider, but for me it is an important factor for a sports car.

  • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:11
    -1

    I posted because it is about 10k less than most pundits were expecting, especially the awesome 303kW V8.

    Toyota MR2 is no longer sold new, and even if it was, it is pretty slow by today's standards….any stock Falcon or Commodore or Aurion is quicker in a straight line vs MR2.

      • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:16
        +9

        Golf GTI 0-100 6.4 s
        Mustang V8 0-100 4.4s
        Not even close!

        • noyesmaybeok on 05/03/2015 - 11:31
          +5

          @tuzii: Any 'facts' aside it's ridiculous to compare a stock car to one which has thousands of $ on upgrades.

        • JimB on 05/03/2015 - 11:39
          +13

          @tuzii:

          As a Mk5 GTI owner, I apologise to everyone on behalf of GTI owners out there.

          Most of us are realistic and not Mod Removed talking bullshit about modded cars. Mod the Mustang and the results will be the same.

          Stop giving us GTI owners a bad name. I like my GTI as it's the perfect daily driver, but it's not a performance car. The Renault RS275 is a performance car, even though it's FWD. The GTI doesn't even have a LSD.

          I would love a Mustang V8, but I'll prob go for the EcoBoost- lighter, better weight distribution and still fast enough. The only reason to get the V8 is for the V8 noise.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:52
          +4

          @JB1:
          Yep that V8 noise is what I want to hear every morning when I fire it up. I reckon it will be better for resale too, so not really losing anything, apart from spending more on fuel!
          But agree, the Ecoboost will be pretty quick, it does 0-100 in 5.5s, only slightly slower than XR6 Turbo or Commodore SS, and with a modified exhaust ($1000) it will sound better and gain a bit more power.
          Good to see a GTI owner who is a realist. Most think they are driving an F1 car!

        • JimB on 05/03/2015 - 12:02

          @billy_bob:

          I've never owned a V8 before, but love the sound of them, especially the AMGs and Lexus V8 (IS-F).

          3.0L straight six turbo is the largest capacity engine I've owned.

          As it will be my daily driver, I'm worried a V8 will just suck too much petrol. Head says EcoBoost, heart says v8.

          What is the real world fuel consumption of the EcoBoost and V8?

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:09

          @JB1:
          It depends a lot on your driving style and whether you drive more city or highway. For most people the real world fuel usage will be 10-20% more than quoted, so:
          Ecoboost quoted 9.8 >>> real world 11.4
          V8 quoted 12.8 >>> real world 14.8
          Hope that helps.

          I only plan to do 5-10,000 km a year in my V8, so not too worried about the extra fuel.

        • JimB on 05/03/2015 - 12:13

          @billy_bob:

          hmmm real world 15L/100km is a bit too much for me as I'll do over 15,000km a year and 80% of it will be driving in to the city and back for work.

          is that on 91 or 98?

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:21

          @JB1:
          Ecoboost can run on 91 OK (but better on 95), V8 should use 95 minimum. So yes, for you Ecoboost might be better for fuel, but resale might not be as good….

        • This Guy on 05/03/2015 - 12:48

          GTI is 300kg lighter.

          Yes the 2015 Mustang has great handling, but it's sitting on $2k worth of rubber.

          And if Ford kept the auto from the 2014 Mustang, the convertable is a complete waste of time (no manual option).

        • StalkingIbis on 06/03/2015 - 00:06
          +2

          @tuzii:

          compare it stock to stock or modded to modded

        • jackary on 06/03/2015 - 13:20

          @billy_bob: HAHAHAHA buying a Ford for its resale value, give me a break.

  • grog on 05/03/2015 - 11:13
    +4

    Dealer delivery is pure bulls**t profit to the bloke who owns the place.

    It never has been anything else.

  • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:14
    -4

    Happy to move this to forums, but show me another car with this level of performance and equipment level for under 100k.
    Bargains do not always have to be price reductions. Any self respecting sports car enthusiast would call this car a bargain.

    • pyramid on 05/03/2015 - 11:16

      My 2000 Ford falcon with 6 cylinder…

    • GooseHoward on 05/03/2015 - 12:50

      2015 WRX STi is gonna be $50k apparently.
      2015 XR8 has a supercharger IIRC and is similarly priced to the V8 Mustang. That said, I'd get the Mustang over the XR8…

  • annexe on 05/03/2015 - 11:24
    +3

    Sounds like an ad to moi.

    Mustang price guide for USA
    http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/pricing

    • Mustang EcoBoost Fastback: USD$25,300 (AUD$32,890) sells for AUD$44,900
    • Mustang GT Fastback (v8) : USD$32,300 (AUD$41,990) sells for AUD$54,900
    • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 11:46
      +4

      More relevant to compare UK prices:

      http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/ford/mustang/90119/ford-mustang…

      Ecoboost starting at £28,995 >>> AUD $56,547
      V8 model from £32,995 >>> AUD $64,348

      So we are getting it cheap compared to UK.

      • annexe on 05/03/2015 - 12:11
        +1

        UK is right hand drive so I agree that the pricing is more relevant.
        But why would any one in UK would buy mustang for that much?

        For around £28k you get something like Lotus Elise.
        Or if you're into luxury performance vehicle BMW 228i.

        From what I can see Mustang is an awesome vehicle on the straight line specially on the drag strip, but on a wet bendy road not sure how well it performs against above vehicles.

        But gotta give thumbs up for its looks and power! vvrrrooommm!!!

        • JimB on 05/03/2015 - 12:15
          +2

          Actually, for an American car, this car turns in very very well even compared to a European car.

          It's a well balanced.

          The Yanks must have got some input from the Ford's European RS team when designing the car.

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:16

          Check out some reviews, the latest Mustang handles much better than older ones, due to much more rigid body structure, IRS at rear and a more European style suspension tune. And the Aus model come standard with the sports pack that includes 19" wheels, sports suspension and Brembo brakes on the V8, these would add at least 7-8k to the price if they were not included.

        • annexe on 05/03/2015 - 12:19

          Haha… sounds like you guys are just about ready to put the deposit down on this baby!
          I would definitely take it for a test drive when it gets here!

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 05/03/2015 - 12:23
          -1

          @annexe:
          I already have! I want to get one of the first batch. Can't wait, been up all night watching YouTube videos of it. Love it!

        • annexe on 05/03/2015 - 12:38

          @billy_bob: Mate its gonna be a long wait if you keep that up. But enjoy your new ride real soon!

        • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 08/03/2015 - 00:50

          @billy_bob:
          Whoever negged my comment above ("I already have! I want to get one of the first batch….."), get a life! I am excited about getting this car so what's it to you? If you don't like it, go and buy something else. You don't have to rain on my parade. Sheesh!

    • JimB on 05/03/2015 - 12:11
      +3

      You can't compare those prices as those prices you quoted are for the base model. Australian Mustangs are pretty well optioned (as standard).

      Regardless, you can't buy one in the US and ship them here.

      If you want examples of extreme price disparity- check out what a Porsche cost in the US compared to AU.

      I think Ford have done an excellent job to get the prices to where they are.

      • shadowarrior on 05/03/2015 - 12:15
        +1

        No doubt, those are brilliant prices. I was expecting the V8 to be around the 100 mark. Also, most likely I will be buying a V8 Manual. But am still waiting and hoping Ford launches their F series trucks here. Also if Ford is bringing their Mustangs here, I want to see what would one of their biggest competitor from the US market will sell here. Yeah, am looking at you Chevvy. So will hold on for couple more years and see how it plays out.

        • haoxuee on 05/03/2015 - 19:40

          F series trucks is unlikely … maybe in 2020… but we have better chance to see corvette camaro or dodge challenger here before 2018 when the all factory shut down ..

      • jeremism on 09/03/2015 - 23:33

        Agreed on the sharp pricing, and on other manufacturers with nasty mark ups!

        A few yrs ago a move to North America was on the cards for me and I was looking at prices of Porsches… The Cayman R was $66k in the US compared to $180k here, when the AUD was at parity with the USD.

        • JimB on 10/03/2015 - 00:45

          Crazy isn't it.

          I always wanted to own a Porsche when I was younger as I'm mad about cars.

          I suppose I could now afford say a new Boxster if I wanted to.

          However now I have the means to buy, I see the prices overseas- US and UK and knowing that we get ripped off so much I can't bring myself to paying over $100k for a Boxster.

          A shame as they are really great cars, but not value for money.

          If I worked in.the US, I'd sign myself up for a 911.

        • jeremism on 10/03/2015 - 08:10
          +1

          @JB1:

          I hear you. I ended up going down the second hand road with a 4yo Cayman S. There were a few low kms examples out there, and because it was from from the Porsche dealership it had 1 yr factory warranty. The depreciation on non-911 Porsches is quite harsh, which helped too.

        • JimB on 10/03/2015 - 11:25
          +1

          @jeremism:

          Nice one, living my dream. The 981 Cayman would be my perfect car.

          You ended up buying in Australia or the US?

        • jeremism on 10/03/2015 - 11:28

          @JB1:

          Here in Oz, US never happened.

        • JimB on 10/03/2015 - 11:30

          @jeremism:

          Awesome, tell me your Cayman is a manual and I'll have a man crush on you! lol

        • jeremism on 10/03/2015 - 11:31

          @JB1:

          Lol! It certainly was. Why buy a driver's car like that and get an auto?

        • JimB on 10/03/2015 - 11:50

          @jeremism:

          Well man crush is official then! lol

          Every time I ogle at a Porsche and then get closer to see it's an automatic transmission or PDK, I think the owner is only buying the car because of the badge and not because its the perfect sports car (in a manual).

        • jeremism on 10/03/2015 - 12:29

          @JB1:

          Haha!

          Same. Though the PDK is pretty damn good as well from what I've heard.

        • JimB on 11/03/2015 - 12:12

          @jeremism:

          Yup, PDK is superfast. efficient. I understand why the GT3 is PDK only. The GT3 is made to go fast without compromise.

          However, outright speed doesn't always equal driving enjoyment.

          I'll continue to buy manuals until they aren't available anymore in sports cars, until such time, manuals all the way.

  • dlakers3peat on 05/03/2015 - 14:18
    +1

    If money was no object I would get this beast instead!!

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/ford/mustang/90113/2015-shelby-…

    To get a Shelby GT, existing 2015 Mustang GT Fastback or Convertible owners can contact their dealer and pay a £26,500 upgrade fee. Shelby will then carry out the modifications and issue the car with a unique number and official documentation to prove its authenticity.

  • Ghost35 on 05/03/2015 - 14:26

    I am looking forward to it's release but doubt I will get one. Maybe 2-3 years down the track I can get a 2nd hand one. I am curious one what prices these models will be down to 2-3 years after release.

    • haoxuee on 05/03/2015 - 19:44

      half price in 3 years depends on KM.. only cars like LFA 918 laFerrari P1 one-77 hold its value ..

      • Employeebilly_bob @ Ford Australia on 06/03/2015 - 09:45

        Depends on how many Ford imports and whether owners like them and hang on to them. If that is the case, there will be very few on the second hand market, so prices could remain high. I reckon I will keep mine for 10 years or more.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join