• expired

Lexar 256GB Professional 1066x Compact Flash Memory Card (UDMA 7) $479.95 USD @ B&H Photo Video

50
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Yes, it's 256GB of very, very fast Compact Flash storage for an insanely high price. (Guess: About $600 AUD). Shipping is $10.25 USD for about a 3 week delivery time to Sydney; higher cost to get it sooner.

Other options:
2x 128GB for AUD$544 delivered from Amazon.com (using Amazon Currency Converter…28 Degrees would be cheaper) (Thanks @spackbace)
2x 128GB for $514 AUD delivered from B&H

Speed-wise, the Lexar 1066x cards are as fast as you can get for most cameras out today. There's a newer technology that's faster, but I don't think any cameras supporting it have been released yet.

But if you use fast CF, you'll recognize that the price is much less insane than it usually is, and really pretty competitive on a GB-for-GB basis. Australian prices from shops here tend to be in the $1000 AUD and up category. Best price on staticice is $1153 AUD. Even on ebay, factoring in currency conversion, you're still paying over $800 AUD.

The Lexar cards are great for CF-capable cameras with high speed shutters such as the Canon 7D Mk II, particularly if you like to shoot raw.

I'd buy this if I hadn't laid in a supply of the 64GB Lexar 1066x cards during a B&H sale before Christmas (which I, in poor taste, forgot to mention here… so I wanted to mention this deal, which is on a GB for GB basis roughly equivalent in price.)

What are the use cases for such a large card? Longer uninterrupted time lapse sequences, use in the secondary card slot as a backup card (yes, the 7D Mark II does a sort of mirroring if you set it up to do so), laziness (best combined with backup card :-).

Educational materials for those with slower cameras who don't think any current camera gets any gain from using high speed cards such as this:
http://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/canon-7d-mark-ii/fastest-sd…

Of course the buffer fills EVENTUALLY, but it's a question of how long things go before it fills. One poster claims cameras can only handle 10 RAW images in the buffer, so I guess he's never played with a 7d Mark II, that can buffer over 30 RAW images. With the shutter held down, I write about 35 RAW images, and then it stops because the buffer is full, and with the shutter still held down, it starts doing 5-6 images per second, sustained, with a sub-second gap between each burst of 5-6. So it all depends on what your camera is. The one I have was designed to capture lots of images quickly — not all are.

Related Stores

B&H Photo Video
B&H Photo Video

closed Comments

  • +2

    2x 128GB for AUD$544 delivered from Amazon.com (using Amazon Currency Converter…28 Degrees would be cheaper)

    Handy having a spare, and saving the money by doing so

    • I concur, this is a much better option if you are using it in a DSLR. Better to have a backup. These hold an insane amount of images btw. I shoot on a 6D with a 64GB card and I think it can hold just over 3000 photos. Thats a lot of RAW images before downloading!

    • VERY good price. Consider posting that as a deal?

      • -1

        Note that its 2x128gb, so totals the same size as your post, but 2 cards :)

        (Same from BHP is about AUD$514 posted)

        • Well obviously mate, so I called it a "VERY good price" and invited you to post it as a deal?

          Why do you question my reply that way as if I didn't grok it's a "VERY good price" when I said so?

          To quote you ":)" ?

        • @NWLikeShopping:

          Haha just making sure you didnt think it was 2x 256gb cards for that price ;)

          Given BHP is cheaper, feel free to just add that as an option to your deal, it's all good! Chuck both options in the title, and have the Amazon link in the description for an alternative.

        • @Spackbace: Will do!

  • -5

    I think paying premium for faster card is pointless because most of these cards will have speed greater than the camera buffer speed so no matter how fast your card is, the camera will only be capable of taking around 10 shots in raw (or even worse like D7100). By the time manufacturer comes out with better specs camera, the same card will cost much less.

    • High end video can require some fast cards. Canon C500 shoots 4K at 500Mbps. Plus it would be nice knowing if you spend money like this on a CF card, it will be good for at least a few years from now.

      • -3

        not really, full hd video recording works fine on my sdhc card which has write speed around 20mbs, the only card I had problem with is the old sandisk ultra (which state 30mb read but no mention of write speed). This is for SD card but I assume the same is for CF.

        • Full HD is pretty much standard, this is a PRO card for pro application, not just HD.

        • -3

          @clarky: yeah, which pro camera using CF and can record higher than full HD, not many.

        • @lgacb08: Yes i wouldn't call them common or consumer but they are out there and these kind of cards are built for the video aspects as well as high frame shooting. Rumour has it next week we will see a 50MP Canon DSLR, perhaps a 5Ds and it will use CF unless they decided to take on Cfast specs.

        • Depends on your compression settings and/or whether your camera is capable of writing the full UNCOMPRESSED stream to an internal card rather than an external recorder as well.

          I had a tablet that clearly SAW images very clearly. I could see them crystal clear on screen as it was recording. But at playback time, oh, the nightmare, because of the intensive compression it did that was not user configurable. Made the thing useless for videos.

        • @lgacb08:

          yeah, which pro camera using CF and can record higher than full HD, not many.

          You need to check out Magic Lantern firmware. It runs on many Canon DSLRs. With the 5D MkIII, you can do RAW full HD video recording but you need a fast card like this one.

    • 7D Mk II can shoot 10 shots PER SECOND. It needs the fast card if you're taking lots of shots in a short time window.

      • -1

        yeah, but it doesn't justify the price. Looks like this, camera has 10fps but it will let you burst for around 1-2 sec, then it stop for a second or two because buffer is full before allowing you to take another burst, which is pointless because you can miss something within that few second break, and it will do this to every card no matter how fast the speed, faster card may cut the break shorter but not significant.

        • Perhaps your camera only lets you buffer for 1-2 seconds. Mine goes for 3-4 at 10fps. At a slower burst rate, it can go for longer.

        • @NWLikeShopping: not when you shoot in raw

        • +2

          @lgacb08: I just tried it. Real world stats for my 7d Mark II, sitting next to me, are now in my post to silence sceptics. Wasn't lying. Bought this camera BECAUSE of this feature, specifically. :-)

  • -3

    Cool. CF=IDE! I can use this to replace the 1.8" IDE drive in my 10-year-old Thinkpad. How much did you say it costs?
    Am amazed cameras are still using such ancient technology.

    • -1

      dafuq?

    • manic, believe it or not, these are faster than cards like the Sandisk Extreme Pro SD's. I know, ancient as all get out. But surprise, they've kept evolving no less than SD's have. (It initially surprised me as well.)

      • -1

        They sure are fast! It's like waterskiing behind a sailing ship. Just can't understand why they haven't moved to mSata, or something based on it (when SD UHS isn't enough). CF is so expensive.

  • Isn't the whole point how fast the camera can empty the buffer? And that will depend on how fast the camera can write to the memory card.

    The OP's link clearly shows that faster cards allow the camera to perform faster.

  • What is it they say about putting too many eggs in one basket…. for work I'd be terrified if i had a whole days shoot sitting on a single memory card… but thats just me.

  • God damn, this memory card is more expensive than my camera!

    • +2

      It's more expensive than my CAR!

  • -1

    This is very cheap.
    I paid $640 for a 64MB CF card in year 2000.

Login or Join to leave a comment