This is related to post Purchase 2 Continental Tyres Min $190 and Get Access to ContiRewards App Free Pizzas + More
Original offer
* Purchase 2 conti tyres and get access to conti rewards app which includes:
* 1 free dominos pizza per day, 2 for 1 movie vouchers as well as 2 for 1 other random crap for 12 months.
However the free dominos pizza offer was replaced by 20% off EatNow offer with varies restrictions later September.
The domino pizza was the most attractive offer that drew many customers to purchase the tyres including myself. No question that Continental are good tyres. The question is whether Continental has the right to alter the T&C in their own favour? Using the bait to lure customer and take it away afterwards. Sounds like false advertisement to me.
Original T&C:
http://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/83594/25588/conti-rewar…
Current T&C (01-10-2014):
http://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/83594/25587/conti-rewar…
T&C link:
http://www.continentalpromotions.com.au/pdfs/Conti-RewardsT&…
and in the T&C there is this clause:
7 . TLC reserves the right to withdraw, change or substitute the offers with another offer of equal or greater value.
Me and a few fellow OzBargainers are ready to take this to ACCC and need some advice and support. If you are interested in the progress, feel free to vote and reply. Better still if there are more names in the complaint to ACCC, there may be more chances.
Thanks to @nexus4, these clauses might be relevant to the issue:
From the Australian Consumer Law:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/caca201026…
23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
(1) A term of a consumer contract is void if:
(a) the term is unfair; and
(b) the contract is a standard form contract.
24 Meaning of unfair
(1) A term of a consumer contract is unfair if:
(a) it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract; and
(b) it is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term; and
(c) it would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were to be applied or relied on.
25 Examples of unfair terms
(d) a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party (but not another party) to vary the terms of the contract;
I don't think Conti have done anything wrong here. Your case would most likely either be with the marketing company TLC, or with Dominos depending on who actually withdrew the offer!