Hi all,
What sort of factors do you guys consider when it comes to deciding whether a real estate agent is a suitable property manager? I'm currently considering changing my current property manager because I feel that I could probably be getting an agent that does more.
For example, what I consider to be basic would be stuff like conducting an annual property inspection as well as making sure you receive your rent on the same date of every month (excluding public holidays) along with a rental statement. I consider a monthly charge of about 6% to be average.
I also recall seeing a deal posted here by an ozbargainer for something like.. 70% of letting fee, for a new real estate agent based in Bankstown. I was considering checking them out too but I can't find the deal anymore.
For the most part, they satisfy MY basic requirements except I don't think they do the property inspection bit. Just wanna see what you guys look for?
Thanks
The agent can only pass on the rent as the tenant pays it. Some agents seem to be quick with the turnaround, some hold onto your money for ages and spin lines like 3 days cheques clearing when you know that the tenant paid in cash. I changed from one that was sitting on rent for too long. A lot will charge for inspections, rolling the lease, anything really, you don't get something for nothing these days. They really only earn their money finding you a tenant and when something goes wrong. From my experience, property managers want to earn commission to do nothing, so start being demanding and they will not pretend to be sad to see you go to another agent. The key is to find an awesome tenant and then ditch the real estate agent altogether - easier said than done.