• expired

UPDATED: EggMaps HD (an app to provide Google Maps for iPad) -- UPDATE: FREE on Friday 25 Jan

180

UPDATE: Since I didn't have enough promo codes to go around, I have made the app free for today. Get it at the link just below this paragraph, and enjoy.

https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/eggmaps-hd/id589718934?ls=1&…

EggMaps is an app to use Google Maps on your iPad (since Google haven't yet released one for iPad). It is iPad-only.

25 (single-use) codes are available at the link below. Use your iPad to follow the link; the process will be much easier.
http://redeemco.de/g/eggmaps-hd_63f9/

To redeem the code (once you have one):

  1. Open the App Store app from your iPad (this is iPad-only)
  2. Click on "Featured" (bottom left-hand corner)
  3. Scroll to the very bottom
  4. Click "Redeem" (in the center at the very bottom)
  5. Enter your code.

If you accidentally grabbed a code before realising that you don't have an iPad, please post it here so someone else can use it.

Related Stores

Apple App Store
Apple App Store
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • -5

    what if i dont want it on my ipad

    • +7

      Don't redeem the code.

    • The app was made specifically for iPads because Google Maps hasn't been released on iPad yet…

  • +1

    Thanks redeemed one

  • +1

    Nice icon :)

    • +3

      You noticed!

      Yep, the simple icon you see in the App Store will be replaced by the one above soon.

  • Is it the same one you give out last time for free?

    http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/91432

    • Yes

    • Yes, same app. That was before I started charging for it!

  • +1

    Thank you, redeemed one…
    quick try it, so far so good… :)

  • May i get one please. Thanks

    • Sorry you missed out. I ran out of codes, so I've made it free for today.

  • all gone, missed out .. oh well.

    • I hope you manage to get it today.

  • Love the icon:) That was one of the first that was submitted wasn't it? u're onto a winner with that one:)

    • Thanks! I love it too.

      You're 99% correct. It was actually entry #186, but that was a modified version of entry #2 (by the same designer).

Login or Join to leave a comment