Starlink Standard Kit with 12-Month $139/Month Residential Plan: $0 Delivered (Select Areas Only, RRP $549) @ Starlink

1230
Starlink Standard Kit with 12-Month $139/Month Residential Plan: $0 Delivered (Select Areas Only, RRP $549) @ Starlink
Go to Deal
geekcohen on 03/04/2025 - 13:36 starlink.com (2390 clicks)
Last edited 07/04/2025 - 13:40 by 4 other users

In select areas, Starlink offers new customers the option to purchase a $0 Starlink Kit with a 12-Month Residential service plan commitment. The customer has a 30-day trial with a full refund period. After the 30 day trial, the service commitment ends 12 months after the customer's activation date.

T&Cs Apply

During the service commitment, taking any of the following actions will result in a Change Fee:

  • Change service address
  • Cancel service
  • Fail to timely pay your bill
  • Attempt to transfer your kit to another user
  • Cancel service during the 30-day trial and not return your kit
  • The Change Fee is reduced on a monthly, pro-rated basis over the 12-month period. The current fee is $549.

The select areas will most likely be Regional Areas only and also areas that are not congested. Areas are not 100% known and may vary from state to state.

This is more suited for homes and businesses at fixed locations. Doesn't apply to Mini and/or Roaming.

Speed Tests of Standard Kit can be found here including Latency - This is on a Residential Plan (not Residential Lite).

Referral Links

Referral: random (119)

The referrer and referee receives bonus credit for a month of standard service, 30 days after the referee activates and keeps their Starlink. Referrals will only issue credits to Standard Plan (Residential) and Mobile Regional (Roam) subscriptions. Kits purchased from a retailer or reseller are not eligible for the referral program. No credit will be given even if a referral link was used during activation.

Internet Satellite Broadband Satellite Internet Starlink

Related Stores

Starlink
Starlink

Comments

  • mike44 on 03/04/2025 - 13:37
    +88

    i've got front seats. and popcorn

    • bdl on 03/04/2025 - 13:52
      +16

      make sure you have reliable internet so you can watch the stream

    • Ozsaver88 on 03/04/2025 - 14:01
      +53

      10% tariff on seats, 39% tariff on popcorn. Let's make Ozbargain great again! :)

      • bcYield on 04/04/2025 - 16:45

        Make America expensive again

    • VerticallyIntegrated on 03/04/2025 - 14:17
      +15

      Everything’s computer!

    • Big Dog on 04/04/2025 - 12:25
      +1

      “It’s such an old-fashioned term, but a beautiful term: groceries. It sort of says a bag with different things in it”.

  • hopper on 03/04/2025 - 13:41
    +18

    deal from POTUS

    • flagger on 03/04/2025 - 13:58
      +12

      Slaps dish This bad boy can fit so much X in it

      • bcYield on 03/04/2025 - 15:14
        +1

        X

      • FujinShu on 03/04/2025 - 16:41

        Musk has 3X.

  • skwashd on 03/04/2025 - 13:44
    +9

    Don't make it like the previous deal

    What things should we avoid for this deal? Elon's businesses?

  • wibgyor on 03/04/2025 - 13:51
    +3

    Can I comment if it’s not available in my area?

    • geekcohen on 03/04/2025 - 13:56
      -3

      Sure. Share your postcode as well for a bit of a reference.

      • Name on 03/04/2025 - 15:38
        +3

        Gold Coast here. Starlink isn't available due to over congestion. They aren't taking new sign ups but you can still buy the hardware from my local officeworks for some reason. 🤘

        • geekcohen on 04/04/2025 - 05:46
          +1

          Yeah, Gold Coast and some southern areas of QLD are "Sold Out".

          You can still buy it and sign up, but might have to pay a one time $149 Congestion Fee.

          • Name on 04/04/2025 - 12:51

            @geekcohen: Oh really? I didn't realise you could get around it by paying a congestion fee. That's good for those with no alternative. Well… Other than sky muster which is basically the same as no alternative anyway. Hah

  • Hinee on 03/04/2025 - 13:52
    +79

    I see broad agreement in Foxtel deals that people refuse to use the service due to it being a Murdoch product.
    I don't see any difference in someone's moral compass directing them to avoid Starlink.

      • mooney on 03/04/2025 - 13:57
        +35

        I hear you, but for the record.. I really do hate Elon Musk. I hope to see him destitute, that day will be a great day.

        • ATangk on 03/04/2025 - 14:06
          +1

          Hearing him speak makes Dutton sound like a saint.

        • Gdsamp on 03/04/2025 - 15:10
          +2

          First they came for the Chris Ellisons, and i did not speak because i was not Chris Ellison

        • entropysbane on 04/04/2025 - 08:21

          The trouble of that is that where does that leave Starlink and spaceX?

          Because both of those alone of his initiatives will do far more good for humanity in the long run than a few millions tossed in the direction of a politically aligned NGO.

      • Mooncakes on 03/04/2025 - 13:58
        +14

        Idk you can't have it both ways, disallow bad comments about him/company but allow the ones praising just him/company.

      • freefall101 on 03/04/2025 - 14:20
        +10

        Why not? Issue with retailer is valid for a neg according to the OzBargain rules.

        • askbargain on 03/04/2025 - 14:24
          +4

          issue or opinion

          • mpember on 05/04/2025 - 02:11

            @askbargain: In my opinion, the issue is that the profits of the retailer go to funding the political and social meddling of the major stakeholder.

    • Mooncakes on 03/04/2025 - 13:55
      -1

      its because people love to be edgy and cringe with Elon, no one wants to be edgy and cringe for old man Murdoch. Just look at the comments already trying to be funny

      • PainToad on 03/04/2025 - 14:12
        +34

        I don't think hating Nazis is edgy and cringe.

        • Mooncakes on 03/04/2025 - 23:57
          +1

          Sorry you misunderstood what I was saying, I agree. What I meant was the people who love him and praise him are edgy and cringe, because he does things "you're not supposed to do or say" so they love him being edgy.

        • LFO on 04/04/2025 - 09:42
          +1

          SPOT ON TIME!

          The Nazis recurrent theme has reached a lost thread.
          And that was rather quick this time …

      • Flyerone on 03/04/2025 - 16:00
        +15

        Elon himself is as cringe AF, and nobody hating on a Nazi is cringe.

    • Ham Dragon on 03/04/2025 - 14:15
      -8

      The same people whining about Murdoch are having hissyfits over Musk. Both are equally stupid reasons to downvote a deal. Don't buy it, whatever, but downvoting because your personal politics aren't aligned with the product is juvenile in the extreme.

      • rooster7777 on 03/04/2025 - 14:29
        +23

        Yep… having a conscience is juvenile in the extreme.
        There's a deal on the next page for some nazi brand imitation gold teeth…. will you be going for that, or will your "personal politics" have a problem there?

        • payton on 03/04/2025 - 15:16
          -2

          here's a sample of your worldview, content quality and 'conscience'. 55 comments in a single thread.
          https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/874008/comments#commenter-…

          nazi brand imitation gold teeth
          felon musk products.

          JFC, nothing inflammatory at all ..
          /s

          • rooster7777 on 03/04/2025 - 15:36

            @payton: You keep australia beautiful with your rose coloured glasses while the adults are aware that a world exists outside our personal space.

            • payton on 03/04/2025 - 16:06
              +2

              @rooster7777: The behaviour you displayed is so far removed from what society defines as reasonable

              • rooster7777 on 03/04/2025 - 16:23
                +12

                @payton: I do apologise for introducing a sometimes foreign concept…. that reasonable people have a conscience. If you refrain from attacking that concept, I'll refrain from disturbing you.

                • payton on 03/04/2025 - 18:32
                  -6

                  @rooster7777: Your grasp of 'concepts' doesn't extend much further from just harassing everyone in a thread with the same line.
                  It'll be a massive spoiler to introduce any further concepts to you.

          • mooney on 04/04/2025 - 08:45

            @Ham Dragon: Wait. If you think this is just a forum to only discuss deals can you stay on topic please. Why do you keep talking about Musk and Murdoch?

            Practice what you preach Hammy.

      • prodrome on 03/04/2025 - 15:08
        +7

        Boycotts are smart and effective.

        Juvenile protests include blocking traffic, glueing yourself to a bridge and storming a government building.

        • Ham Dragon on 03/04/2025 - 16:22
          -3

          As above, don't buy it if you don't want to, no one's going to complain.

          • Trentgibbo3 on 03/04/2025 - 20:37
            +4

            @Ham Dragon: It looks like you are complaining though - let people say whatever they want

    • Gyr on 03/04/2025 - 14:21
      -6

      The Murdoch thing is an even stupider circlejerk than the Musk thing

    • ozbargainer88 on 03/04/2025 - 14:24
      +3

      I think the difference here is Foxtel has very viable alternatives. Starlink is easily the best option for fast reliable internet in some areas. It is miles again of NBN satellite.

    • Dsiee on 04/04/2025 - 07:47

      The problem with avoiding startling is, for The intended rural audience on sky muster satalite, there is no alternative or even remotely comparable option. It is easy to geg a BYD over a Tesla (imo the byd is just better anyway) but Starlink is it for leo satalite internet unfortunately.

  • Gdsamp on 03/04/2025 - 13:53
    +28

    Commenting just because I disapprove of Elon and I have no experience with the Service

    • WT on 05/04/2025 - 18:37

      used it while house sitting, couldnt stream at night, had to switch to mobile data

  • d-hunterz on 03/04/2025 - 13:53
    +30

    Any tariff on this?

    • awesomise on 03/04/2025 - 14:10

      Albo said no retaliatory tariffs, yet.

  • vasil on 03/04/2025 - 13:57
    +33

    "Please don't comment just because you disapprove of Elon .."

    Official Starlink T&Cs!

    • Morven on 03/04/2025 - 15:13
      +6

      Yeah here on my Starlink account I can freely post that Elon Musk is **** and ******* and even > ERROR 420 RATE LIMIT EXCEEDED

  • THX on 03/04/2025 - 13:59
    +1

    I definitely wanted to try this but not for residential, to go camping and have reception. Maybe a smaller plan

    • sobriety22 on 03/04/2025 - 14:08
      -3

      Look at Viasat as an alternative.

    • geekcohen on 03/04/2025 - 14:16
      +3

      There is the Starlink Mini at $599 (plus delivery) and there is a $80 Roaming Plan which gives you 50GB of data. The roaming can be paused as well. The Starlink Mini can also be powered off 12V. So perfect camping solution. I've got a Mini.

      The Mini has been on special for $300 in the past.

      • jjsnacks on 03/04/2025 - 15:20
        +4

        The mini can be powered off a power bank, it's pretty amazing

        • bcYield on 03/04/2025 - 15:25

          It is powered by 60V 1A and that not many power banks can power the mini properly. Some good brands like Anker might do. Most of my power banks are 30V max and I am not dare to try yet.

          • jjsnacks on 03/04/2025 - 15:28
            +1

            @bcYield: Runs on usbc
            They sell an official USBC cable
            I have mine running off a 45w power bank

            • bcYield on 03/04/2025 - 15:33

              @jjsnacks: Good to know that it works. But not sure if it will affect in long term due to insufficient voltage/power.

    • shroomish on 03/04/2025 - 14:18
      -1

      You really need to camp somewhere with a broadband connection, preferably optic fibre… In case elon spits the dummy and turns off starlink in oz due to hurt feelings.

  • bargainboyzz on 03/04/2025 - 13:59
    +4

    No thanks I'll keep my shitty internet to show I'm deeply invested in my obviously righteous political stance (sarcasm)

    • PainToad on 03/04/2025 - 14:14
      +2

      Imagine thinking Skylink isn't shitty internet. Enjoy the shit upload and high ping.

      • shroomish on 03/04/2025 - 14:20
        +6

        They skipped the part where its a good deal and achieve market dominance and went straight the enshittification firehose.

      • TightKingBilly on 03/04/2025 - 14:41
        +10

        Because of course most people considering starlink are swimming in high upload low ping alternatives…

        • PainToad on 03/04/2025 - 14:54
          -2

          We will all be swimming in high upload low ping FTTP eventually unless the Liberals don’t get their way and switch the rollout to Skylink.

          • TightKingBilly on 03/04/2025 - 15:06
            +6

            @PainToad: No, we won't. Plenty of parts of the country will never see FTTP. Plenty of rural areas never even got FTTN, only FW, and plenty of areas didn't even get FW. And in the places that did get FW there are plenty of dead spots. I know places where Telstra gave up any semblance of maintaining the old copper a decade ago, and if they won't do that, why would I believe they would ever string up and then maintain fibre for a handful of rural customers?
            Even when the tower is only 5km away the only option is patchy 4g, skymuster or electric car man bad net.

            • PainToad on 03/04/2025 - 15:20
              -4

              @TightKingBilly: Sorry by “all” I mean people living in cities, towns and suburbs.

              Those living in the middle of nowhere where knew that services would be limited when they chose to live there.

              • Ham Dragon on 03/04/2025 - 15:31
                +1

                @PainToad: Damn, that is some massive latte sipper hubris…

                I guess people choose to be poor / disabled / sick from congenital illnesses / etc etc too, right?

              • TightKingBilly on 03/04/2025 - 17:24
                +2

                @PainToad: Right, so people either live in a town, city, or suburb, or the middle of nowhere. No where in Australia could possibly qualify as anything else. No such thing as rural, semi rural, acreages, farming communities, etc.

      • jjsnacks on 03/04/2025 - 15:20
        +3

        Starlink is far better than my Nbn fw connection.

      • basketcase86 on 04/04/2025 - 04:18

        I’ll give you a pass on the assumed typo. Anyways this is a good deal for a lot of people. Remember facts not feelings people.

      • tmcn85 on 04/04/2025 - 13:30
        +1

        EDS. Sad!

  • jayc0nn0r on 03/04/2025 - 14:00
    +3

    lol

  • PilonDo on 03/04/2025 - 14:01

    $139/month for 12 months (lock-in)

    • geekcohen on 03/04/2025 - 14:02

      I've updated the title to reflect.

  • Pacify on 03/04/2025 - 14:05
    +2

    Its an actual tragedy that Musk owns Spacex, starlink and Tesla

    • vasil on 03/04/2025 - 14:08

      He doesn't own squat. Borrowed.

      • shroomish on 03/04/2025 - 14:24
        +17

        He owns trump, makes him work a second job selling teslas.

      • Pacify on 03/04/2025 - 14:58
        +5

        Wait, you think the richest person on the planet doesn't own anything?

        • vasil on 03/04/2025 - 16:57
          -2

          Ownership rights will be affected by his criminal activities.

          • zubzub on 03/04/2025 - 17:15
            +2

            @vasil: Which ones? I need a good laugh.

    • Grok on 03/04/2025 - 15:38
      +1

      Wait until you hear about X, xAI, Neuralink and The Boring Company.

      • ShadowSaver on 03/04/2025 - 16:14
        +4

        and you Grok lol

    • opilot87 on 03/04/2025 - 23:37
      +1

      This embarrassing for humanity. No wonder Elon wants to go to Mars

  • Ozsaver88 on 03/04/2025 - 14:05

    Free Starlink kit if you commit like a true fanboy ;)

  • Junior royals on 03/04/2025 - 14:05
    +32

    Haha, I guess today every Australian will disapprove the USA trying to kill our exports to the US. Why ahould we not specifically target Musk's products and services when our farmers, manufacturers and universities suffer under them?

    • dealhunter52 on 03/04/2025 - 14:17
      +13

      We already have so many upvoters on this deal who would rather add to Musk's wealth than care about Australia or Australian jobs.

    • Kommodore on 03/04/2025 - 14:29
      +3

      Defending Australia's farmers, manufacturers and universities is woke. Snow White is the real issue facing Aussie battlers. American media told me so.

      Not even sarcasm at this point I hear this shit all the time.

    • Grok on 03/04/2025 - 15:40
      -8

      What part of the word reciprocal don’t you like?

      • dealhunter52 on 03/04/2025 - 17:34
        +8

        Except, these are not reciprocal tariffs. They calculated these based on their trade deficit but incorrectly calling these reciprocal tariffs.

        In Australia's case, US has a $17 billion trade surplus, but still slapped us with 10% tariffs because our leaders are spineless (both major parties).

        • Russ on 03/04/2025 - 23:58
          +1

          because our leaders are spineless (both major parties).

          Okay then, what should our leaders do? I await your solution to the problem.

          In case you hadn't noticed, the US has a way larger economy than ours, and are already in trillions of dollars of debt, and unafraid to go further into debt. Anything we do is like a mosquito attacking an elephant - unless you have a brilliant solution.

          • dealhunter52 on 04/04/2025 - 09:55
            +1

            @Russ:

            Okay then, what should our leaders do? I await your solution to the problem.

            They should start with ripping the AUKUS deal first. It's a bad bad deal for Australia and current US administration has made it clear that they would first replenish their fleet before providing any subs to Australia. Development is currently decades behind schedule and we might never get these subs. Australia should get French made Suffren-Class nuclear subs, which are cheaper and will be delivered faster.

            In case you hadn't noticed, the US has a way larger economy than ours, and are already in trillions of dollars of debt, and unafraid to go further into debt. Anything we do is like a mosquito attacking an elephant - unless you have a brilliant solution.

            Australian economy is $1.9 trillion (13th in the world), so I won't really call us mosquitos. Also, Australia has the leverage when we have $17 billion trade deficit with them. Choice is to either keep getting bullied or push back, and sometime you need to grow a f**king spine.

            • Russ on 04/04/2025 - 14:06

              @dealhunter52:

              current US administration

              The US mid-terms are coming in less than two years, the "current administration" (Republicans) will be out of power if they lose three of their 220 seats. Last time DT was president, the midterms gave the Democrats 41 House of Representatives seats, you do the maths. And DT is even more unpopular this time than at the equivalent time during his previous term.

              we have $17 billion trade deficit with them

              The US has a 1.1 trillion (US) dollar deficit. That's 1.75 trillion AUD, just over 100 times larger than the Australian deficit with them. So from the US point of view, we really are a mosquito. And the US has a national debt of 36 trillion USD which they want to reduce, so on that scale we're not even 0.1%.

              keep getting bullied or push back

              Famous quote: "Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." DT wants the fight, you'd be giving him what he wants. And he can cause us far more pain than we can cause him, so your recommended path is self-destructive.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join