[Back Order] Crucial T500 2TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD $199 Delivered @ Amazon AU

230

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

nuker on 27/02/2025 - 21:37 amazon.com.au (576 clicks)
Last edited 27/02/2025 - 21:40 by 1 other user

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Rejoice!
Read/write up to 7,400/7,000MB/s and random read/write up to 1180K/1440K IOPs

Usually dispatched within 2 to 4 weeks.

$185.97 immediate dispatch from Amazon UK via AU, estimate delivery 4-5 April.

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU

Marketplace

Amazon UK Store

• 

  AircraftFreight on 27/02/2025 - 21:45

  +2

  https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/126295498531
  2 left but $199.20 with Express Delivery with code FBRY20

  • 

    nuker on 27/02/2025 - 21:54

    $185.97 if you press "Other Sellers" and select Amazon UK. I cannot order it, because I'm moving places (I hope) :)

• 

  Phoebus on 27/02/2025 - 21:50

  4TB model is OOS

• 

  MunkyAU on 27/02/2025 - 21:55

  +8

  $189 (free postage) @ Centrecom with coupon: CUSCO
  https://www.centrecom.com.au/crucial-t500-2tb-pcie-gen4-nvme…

• 

  Jollystacker on 27/02/2025 - 22:13

  -1

  how good for PS5?

  • 

    nuker on 27/02/2025 - 22:18

    -1

    you'd get twice the FPS

• 

  TightLikeThisx on 27/02/2025 - 23:49

  This or Kingston Fury?

  • 

    jv on 28/02/2025 - 01:12

    yes

  • 

    Meteor Anarcom on 28/02/2025 - 01:50

    +1

    This is worse than KC3000 and Fury

    • 

      8bitsperbyte on 28/02/2025 - 10:41

      Why?

      The T500 has better performance numbers on paper, but worse endurance:

      	Crucial T500	Kingston KC3000	Kingston Fury Renegade
      Sequential Write (MB/s)	7000	7000	7000
      Sequential Read (MB/s)	7400	7000	7300
      Random Write (IOPS)	1,440,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
      Random Read (IOPS)	1,180,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
      Endurance (TBW)	1200	1600	2000
      DRAM	Yes	Yes	Yes

      I think the T500's 1200 TBW is still high enough for most users to not be concerned about.

      I'd consider all three of these high-end SSDs to perform very well and similarly to each other, but shouldn't the T500 still be better?

      The T500 also uses the newer Phison E25 controller and Micron 232L TLC NAND,
      whereas KC3000 and Fury uses the older Phison E18 controller and Micron 176L TLC NAND.
      I'm not really sure which controller is better, but I think the 232L NAND is better than 176L NAND.

      • 

        Meteor Anarcom on 28/02/2025 - 18:13

        -1

        Newer does not necessarily mean better

• 

  djmm on 27/02/2025 - 23:51

  -1

  This