Orico S500 Pro 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD $69.99 Delivered @ ORICO G.O.A.T via Amazon AU

260
ORICOS500PRO
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Another low price 2.5" SATA SSD from Orico which is a better model than the now sold out Orico Y20 and perfectly fine for use as game storage or use in a 2.5" enclosure as a portable SSD.

This one offers sequential read speeds up to 550MB/s, sequential write speeds up to 480MB/s, 400TBW endurance and pSLC cache instead of DRAM cache and an aluminum housing.

  • Redeem the 30% off coupon ORICOS500PRO under the price

On the technical side I checked out Japanese/German reviews and asked Orico. From reviews as recent as last week 512GB SSDs were using Micron TLC flash and 1TB was found to have Intel TLC flash. The controllers seem to be mostly from from SMI and Yeestor with some Realtek. If these batches are the same then that's a lot better than QLC.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
ORICO G.O.A.T AU OFFICIAL STORE
ORICO G.O.A.T AU OFFICIAL STORE

Comments

  • Not sure should I wait for the bigger one….

    • +2

      That's what she said…

      • +1

        She said Black Friday was good.

  • +1

    Thanks. Bought one to upgrade the 240GB BX500 in my retro win7 gaming pc.

  • Can this used for ps4 pro?

    • Yes it can

  • +3

    If you are after an m.2 NVME drive.
    From the same seller:
    This one has a 35% promo and a 12% coupon which takes it to $64.99 - not sure if prime is required.

    https://www.amazon.com.au/ORICO-Gen3-0x4-Internal-Heatsink-E…

    • thanks! bought one :)

  • Nice! Thanks.
    Planning to use it with a Mac Mini (Late 2012).

  • The 2TB Orico for AUD 170 or the Samsung 870 QVO 2TB for the same price (QLC though)?

    https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/aw/d/B089R1C9HV?ref=ppx_pt2_mob…

    • +1

      QLC is yucky. Really slow after it runs out of cache. Unless you’re really really sure your workload is mostly reads - e.g a drive for games or movies, don’t do QLC.

    • +6

      You can either listen to the internet idiots dashing out advice on how "yucky" a technology is that they don't quite understand, or check the basic facts:

      • Samsung is rated to 2,880 TBW write endurance, rather impressive
      • Orico doesn't really have specs or even a decent website, but allegedly they are rated around 600 TBW (?)

      • Samsung manufactures their own stuff, controlling the quality end-to-end

      • Orico gets parts from … somewhere and assemble them

      • Samsung has 6,659 reviews on Amazon with 86% rating it at 5*

      • Orico has 47 reviews, 58% rating at 5*

      • QLC drives with some caching (either memory or SLC) are way more popular these days due to capacity and price

      • QLC technology is not the old dumb QLC tech, firmware and smart cache on the drive can conceal most of their shortcomings
      • The Samsung drive drops sustained write speed after about 78 Gb sustained write (not something you'd ever see, it's a synthetic test) https://www.guru3d.com/review/samsung-870-qvo-2tb-ssd-review…
      • By far most of a computer's workload is read (factor of 3-10), where this QLC discussion does not apply; some niche server applications can get close to 1:1 read write, but most servers are read heavy as well
      • Ask yourself, how often do you need to write more than 78Gb in one go (for reference, a 4K 1h movie is about 8-9Gb compressed)
      • If you need frequent sustained write performance, you may need to buy a reputable SLC (or maybe a TLC) drive for way more money
      • If you feel you actually need a SLC drive, you were probably not honest

      Until next time friends.

      • +1

        But the 2TB QVO mentioned only has 720 TBW…not exactly stellar.

      • 1TB Orico is rated for 400TBW, 2TB for 800TBW.

        870 QVO: 360 TBW for 1TB model, 720 TBW for 2TB model.

        When I copied data from HDD to 1TB QVO drive, the QVO was actually bottlenecked, not HDD. After the SLC cache was used, it becomed painfully slow, I had to wait hours for copying to finish. For me, the minor saving from getting QLC instead of TLC was not worth it.

    • I'd pay a bit more for MX500
      https://www.amazon.com.au/Crucial-MX500-NAND-SATA-Internal/d…

      Unless Crucial switched to SLC for 2TB, it's a much better drive than QVO.

      • You meant QLC?

        • Yes, sure, I meant QLC (I remember some messages regarding switching for 4TB version, I'd check for reports for 2TB MX500 before ordering).

Login or Join to leave a comment