Third-Party
Good for tours if you have upcoming trips, but I have previously rejected on one ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Viator: 20% Cashback (21% Cashback with ShopBack Plus) @ ShopBack
91
nanny0tt on 05/01/2025 - 09:38 shopback.com.au (150 clicks)
Last edited 05/01/2025 - 10:07 by 1 other user
Last edited 05/01/2025 - 10:07 by 1 other user
Referral Links
Referral: random (3652)
$30 for referrer, $5 for referee after referee qualifies.
Qualifying requirements for referee: 1. Made a minimum $20 online purchase (below exclusions apply), 2. Received a minimum $10 confirmed cashback online, 3. Added banking details to account.
Users will need to fulfil the referral criteria within 180 days from referee's sign-up date to unlock cashback. See all terms
Related Stores
Comments
Me too, she was out of my league.
I guess if you are happy to pay a 200% premium using Viator……..
I've noticed some tours are substantially more expensive than direct via the tour provider but if the provider is small and doesn't have a website, what's the alternative? Care to share any tips?
What can you do instead?
Find the same tour on another site. You only book with Viator if they actually do offer the best price or are the only ones that offer it.
I booked 2 tours in Kyoto last night thinking I wanted to use the 20% cashback, but Klook had one of those tours for 25% cheaper. The other tour both Klook and Viator had the same price, so I booked with the Viator cashback.
make contact with the tour provider and book direct - I've seen 500% increases via Viator - even for tours/activities that have their own website……
Just land there and ask in your hotel. It is always way cheaper than even direct tours.
Not with ShopBack but other cashback services I’ve had cashback with Viator denied and they’re the ones denying it not the middlemen, scummy company.
yea mine was also rejected by Viator rather. shopback also said "Cashback will be credited only for eligible and completed travel" but no where did Viator mention what's eligible
I was rejected last month. wont make the same mistake again.