• expired

4 Stainless Steel Bento Boxes with Lock 550mL Lunch Container $26.99 + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $59 Spend) @ BITUSIC Amazon AU

70
4 Stainless Steel Bento Boxes with Lock 550mL Lunch Container $26.99 + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $59 Spend) @ BITUSIC Amazon AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
jimojr on 27/12/2024 - 12:37 amazon.com.au (1299 clicks)
Last edited 27/12/2024 - 13:07 by 1 other user
WLTOXNHL
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Premium Quality: Crafted from durable stainless steel, our bento box ensures long-lasting use and resistance to corrosion, perfect for daily meals on the go.
Leak-proof Design: Equipped with a secure locking mechanism, this lunch container prevents spills and leaks, keeping your food fresh and mess-free during transport.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
This is part of Boxing Day Sales for 2024
Home & Garden Boxing Day Lunch Box

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
BITUSIC
BITUSIC

Comments

  • Jaduqimon on 27/12/2024 - 12:43
    +1

    Can't .microwave though

    • QuickToThePointless on 27/12/2024 - 12:49
      +1

      fine for office use, just not at home ;)

    • ATTS on 27/12/2024 - 13:04

      Whats a good lunch box you can microwave?

      • paaj on 27/12/2024 - 13:49
        +1

        Anything made of glass would be best. I think Ikea do decently priced ones.

        • tonyjzx on 27/12/2024 - 14:04

          theres this new fangled material called "plastic"

          not sure if it'll go anywhere though

          • stewy on 27/12/2024 - 22:21
            +1

            @tonyjzx: Plastics leech chemicals and microplastics into the food, which and increasing amount of research is showing is not exactly healthy. So their answer is still correct, glass is best!

        • ATTS on 27/12/2024 - 14:23

          Thanks I do like ikea

      • afie on 27/12/2024 - 19:25

        Pyrex makes a metal lunchbox that can be microwaved.

        • ATTS on 27/12/2024 - 19:39

          Thanks. Just out of curiousity whats in the design to make the pyrex metal lunchbox microwaveable safe?

          I thought the metal would intefere with the microwave somehow

          • afie on 27/12/2024 - 19:45
            -1

            @ATTS: Large radius curves in any stainless container can allow them to be microwave safe.

            • ATTS on 27/12/2024 - 20:13

              @afie: Thanks

            • Serious Lee on 29/12/2024 - 06:18

              @afie: It's a metal box, not a stealth fighter (microwave ovens and radars have microwave generators, different sizes of course)

      • pl0nker on 30/12/2024 - 14:33

        We have been using these Smash steel lunch boxes that you can microwave. Can get them from woolies.
        https://smashproducts.com/products/meal-box-600ml-indigo

        • ATTS on 30/12/2024 - 16:01

          Thanks man

  • dammit on 27/12/2024 - 12:45
    +2

    Normal price $33.99, not much of a deal?

  • Musiclover on 27/12/2024 - 12:51
    +1

    I got these for $15 around Black Friday, the seller did not honour the deal (they were never sent).

    • ATTS on 27/12/2024 - 13:05

      That sux, Amazon aswell?

  • hippo2s on 27/12/2024 - 15:34
    +4

    This brought back memories of bento boxes in primary school in Asia.

    The reason it's not microwave-able is because back then there it wasn't even invented. The school steam it for all the students just in time for lunch break.

    • Serious Lee on 27/12/2024 - 15:57
      -3

      That is so cool.

      Now they just eradicate nutrients in food with microwave radiation instead…

      • Nom on 27/12/2024 - 20:39
        +1

        Microwaves simply vibrate (and hence heat) the water molecules in your food.

        They don't "eradicate nutrients" any more than any other method of heating - and in fact they can often preserve more nutrients than other cooking methods because the time and the temperatures are generally lower.

        Not sure where you read that particular piece of misinformation, but it's a complete myth.

        • hippo2s on 27/12/2024 - 22:18

          It is common knowledge that high heat disintegrates biological material (especially delicate amino chain materials like proteins and vitamins) at the molecular level.

          When microwave heats the H2O molecules it concentrate on heating it (just the H2O ones like you said, unless the heat is conducted to other parts of the food thru being adjacent) to the now super heated water molecules. That hot water molecule is in contact with others which then causes THAT adjacent molecules to break down. The difference here being you believe the temperature is lower…but I think it's the opposite, it is super high on the H2O molecule, which propagates to adjacent materials.

          I am no scientist but that's what I think. Everyone can form their own ideas and become a google expert on the topic.

          • Serious Lee on 29/12/2024 - 06:15

            @hippo2s: @hippo2s Thanks for enlightening the mindless neggers.

            @Nom "preserve nutrients" what a misinformation :-)

            • Nom on 29/12/2024 - 13:08
              -1

              @Serious Lee: You guys do understand that this subject is well researched, and there are numerous studies covering the nutritional value of Microwaved food ?

              https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/microwave-coo…

              because microwave cooking times are shorter, cooking with a microwave does a better job of preserving vitamin C and other nutrients that break down when heated.

              and

              The cooking method that best retains nutrients is one that cooks quickly, heats food for the shortest amount of time, and uses as little liquid as possible. Microwaving meets those criteria. Using the microwave with a small amount of water essentially steams food from the inside out. That keeps in more vitamins and minerals than almost any other cooking method

              Is there some reason you are clinging to nonsense information ?

              • hippo2s on 29/12/2024 - 13:50

                @Nom: One's belief does not need to correlate to scientific research.

                • Serious Lee on 30/12/2024 - 06:43

                  @hippo2s: Please post links to peer reviews. Also look into if that uni was sponsored by any corporation that has interest in the subject when the study was published. One study on it's own proves very little.

                  • hippo2s on 30/12/2024 - 16:53

                    @Serious Lee: Sorry. I don't care enough to waste time playing internet detective. Nom can believe whatever it is s/he believes in. I have no desire to convert s/he. I don't need to prove I am right or he is wrong.

                    There are plenty of inexplicable things in the world, and science actually knows very little about for example human body workings : new studies comes out every couple of years of if cholesterol is good/bad/what causes high cholesterol that contradict the previously agreed understanding.

                    Just because there is a study, and peer reviewed and non-sponsored, to me means very little to change my belief.

                    Like I said everyone can make up their own minds and believe in whatever it is they believe in.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join