Seiko Classic SUR507P - Quartz, Hardlex, 100m WR $169 Delivered @ Starbuy

40

Go to Deal

Chazzozz on 03/12/2024 - 12:59 starbuy.com.au (1079 clicks)
Last edited 03/12/2024 - 15:44 by 1 other user

If you haven't overspent for BFCM then this no-nonsense Seiko quartz may appeal to you. Retro styling that harks back to the 1960s, grab & go movement, and an ATL price.

Full specs:

• Case Diameter: 40mm
• Case Thickness: 9.75mm
• Case Material: Stainless Steel w/ Black Ion Coating
• Crystal: Hardlex
• Strap: Stainless Steel Bracelet
• Clasp: Tri-Fold Push-Button
• Movement: Quartz Calibre 6N52
• WR: 100m
• Warranty: Seiko 3 Year

Related Stores

StarBuy

• 

  G-rig on 03/12/2024 - 13:08

  -1

  Bit bland and lifeless.. I prefer this version but hard to find in Aus:

  https://www.jomashop.com/seiko-racing-sports-quartz-blue-dia…

  • 

    SpeedRunnerLink on 03/12/2024 - 14:45

    I wouldn't buy either of these watches.

  • 

    onlinepred on 03/12/2024 - 14:46

    Can't you just swap the strap?

    • 

      G-rig on 03/12/2024 - 14:59

      Nah, the colours are what is interesting about it.

      Nah not getting either, they look too cheap and pointless.

  • 

    SirFaffer on 03/12/2024 - 17:16

    my god thats ugly.

    • 

      G-rig on 03/12/2024 - 17:19

      Not as ugly as the commie grey one, but yeah no point to them.

• 

  zxcvb on 03/12/2024 - 13:43

  +2

  Agreed. Lifeless and not solar as well. Eco drives offer much better value at this price point.

  • 

    onlinepred on 03/12/2024 - 14:48

    I thought the eco drives at this size are pretty bland too though?

    • 

      zxcvb on 03/12/2024 - 15:32

      But it's an eco drive and some are actually all right for the price, at least I find them value for money.

      • 

        onlinepred on 03/12/2024 - 21:34

        I mean at this price point you get it because you like the looks or the fit, not really the movement.

        • 

          zxcvb on 03/12/2024 - 21:50

          @onlinepred: I meant, rather an eco drive to avoid the hassle of changing batteries esp at this price point

          • 

            onlinepred on 03/12/2024 - 22:47

            -2

            @zxcvb: Change batteries every 3 years for a few dollars is a no go? Surely the watch would be replaced after 3 years of constant use.