Hi everyone,
We're considering installing natural stone in the kitchen instead of a Caesarstone benchtop. Does anyone have recommendations on which type offers the best value for money? Additionally, does the labor cost vary depending on the type of stone chosen?
We're planning to visit CDK Stone, but they offer a wide range of options including Marble, Granite, Quartz, Neolith, and more.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
The comparison between the two isnt about value for money. It's about preferences, aesthetic and potentially resale value.
I just did my kitchen in marble (a type of Calacatta). Total cost, including honing and sealing, with splashbacks was $23k. We used 4 slabs at 2.9mx 3.3m (cost of a slab was around $3500 inc GST which formed part of this cost).
Engineered stone was quoted at $10k excluding splashbacks.
The feedback Ive had so far on the marble has been extremely positive. Yes, there are maintenance differences but you accept that as part of the decision.
Granite, concrete etc areall about the same slab price (especially Fibonacci and Santa margherita).
As for suppliers, CDK are rubbish and terrible to deal with. In Adelaide I opted for Complete Marble at Wingfield who had zero issues with me turning up 4 times to gawk and feel up stone to finally make a choice. CDK took ages to get a timed appointment and they spent that time trying to tell me what I wanted. Very arrogant bunch.
Labour - yes, all natural and concrete products will require more work. About 10 days fir ours with old school templates then CNC cutting. Depends on the stone too as some marble is soft. Concrete should theoretically be easier. They go slow because $3-4k a slab is a huge cost to stuff up. Engineered they will smash out because if they stuff it, it's easy to replace (so the stonemason told me)