My Father-in-law recently signed a contract for a Mitsubishi Triton through a broker at a local dealer.
The pricing was very sharp and it is a limited edition model. The broker confirmed with the dealer that the model and pricing was correct before forwarding the contract to my FIL. This is in the context of a new Triton model arriving in the next month or so (already with reviewers) and not surprising if they are clearing out stock of the old model.
The car is on the lot and just needed to be detailed and the optional tow bar fitted. It was supposed to be ready last week but the dealer was dodging my FIL's calls and it turns out they have contacted the broker and said they don't want to do it at that price any more.
By this stage my FIL had already signed and sent back the contract and paid the deposit. No other reason was given other than they think the deal is too good. Not a stock problem, not a price rise problem (less that a week since signing the contract), not a trade issue. Just that they don't want to sell it for that price any more.
I am not sure how a dealer can expect to do this - especially with a contract that has "this is a legally binding" plastered all over it. Car is new and from a major dealer in Qld.
What are his rights here? If he wants to take it further would the Office of Fair Trading? Does the MTA have any sway? Is there an ombudsman similar to the Telecommunications Ombudsman who might be able to help or are the contracts just designed to screw customers and protect the dealers?
Unfortunately there's no ombudsman for dealerships or retail trade. Depending on your state, it's fair trading then if they can't help they will refer you to possibly other legal avenues such as tribunals if applicable, in NSW it's NCAT.
If you're in NSW, prob see NCAT first as they deal with contracts: https://ncat.nsw.gov.au/case-types/consumers-and-businesses/….