I bought an alarm clock back in February. It is a clock radio with an LED screen and it cost $60. The LED screen developed a fault and I had the unit replaced with the same model. That occurred in July. That new unit has also developed a fault.
I've just taken it back to the shop and, after a bit of negotiation, the chap in the shop has found a replacement which he will get for me. I should get it next week.
However, he was initially saying that he wasn't going to do anything because it was outside of the 3 month warranty period that he said that the item comes with.
Reading the ACCC guide to warranties / refunds it says:
"Statutory rights are not limited to a set time period. Instead, they apply for the amount of time that is reasonable to expect, given the cost and quality of the item. This means a consumer may be entitled to a remedy under their statutory rights after any manufacturer’s voluntary or extended warranty has expired."
What do you think reasonable would be for this purchase?
Obviously, I want it to work for a long time but I know things break. However, I would have thought it's not unreasonable to expect a $60 clock to last more than 3 months.
Less than $0.70c per day roughly. Three months sounds reasonable to me.