The following question is best answered by a broker, but I'm interested in hearing if others have had similar ideas and experiences.
My partner and I are looking to purchase our first property to live-in and have saved up a 20% deposit to avoid LMI.
My parents, who are now retired, own their primary residence and a rental property out-right.
We're thinking of asking my parents to be guarantors, using the accessible equity of their rental property, as the deposit for a property we would like to purchase and then using the money we've saved (our original deposit saved) to help reduce our repayment amount moving forward.
I'm just wondering if others have had similar ideas and experiences, and whether the above is a possible financing pathway.
Looking forward to hearing people's thoughts.
Thank you in advance.
I don't think you understand the purpose of a guarantor.
Usually a guarantee is only used to purchase when the borrowers have <20% deposit and don't want to pay LMI (the guarantor steps in where the bank would involve a LMI insurer normally - i.e., if the bank had to foreclose on the property due to non-payment, etc. and there was a shortfall between the sale price and the amount owed, the bank would ask the guarantor to front up the difference or sell the guarantor's property instead of asking the insurer to cover said losses).
In this situation, the borrower will still pay interest on the whole amount borrowed (e.g. let's say $1m property with a 100k deposit - 90% LVR - the guarantee will allow the borrower to borrow without paying LMI. The borrower will still be paying interest on the $900k borrowed).
What it sounds like you're trying to do is (using the same $1m property in the example above) pay interest on only $600k whilst borrowing $800k with the other $200k "guaranteed" by your parents' property. The bank still has to borrow the $200k elsewhere to lend to you, so I'd expect they'd still want you to pay interest on that extra $200k.