Does a Bigger Tax Deduction Make Financial Sense if You're Still Paying More?

I've recently moved to a remote area so have switched to a 4G modem and am currently paying $35/month for the service. Speeds are a bit slow, but so far it has been reliable enough for my WFH and personal use. I would say that the split between work/personal use is about 50/50.

I was having a conversation with a friends parent about the slow internet and mentioned how Starlink is an option out here but an expensive one ($139/month excl. up-front costs), and they told me that I should move to Starlink as I can just "write it off on tax" like it was a no-brainer.

I'm pretty uneducated when it comes to tax related stuff as I've had all my tax paperwork handled by a family accountant for years, so I just nodded at the time thinking this was some silver bullet that I needed to look into, but after looking into it a bit it seems that other than being able to effectively "lower" my taxable income, I would still be worse off financially at the end of the year as I would be paying more for internet.

Sure it would be nice to have a faster connection and more data, but I can make do with the connection I currently have, so does having a bigger tax deduction actually make any sense here? Am I missing something?

Comments

  • +1

    So many variables….

    What tax bracket are you in? And how close are you to the below or above bracket?
    How much marginal benefit are you getting from starlink?
    Do you have the free cash flow for starlink or are you purely basing this off the tax deductible amount?
    Let's say you are on the top tax bracket, you are only really getting back $139 * 50% usage * 12

    Also read Q2 as an example for the set up costs: many new apartments, residences etc will require a set up for NBN and it's never been tax deductible.
    https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/view.htm?docid=EV/1051424496….

  • Haven’t read a word in your post, but my answer to your question is only if the net cost is lower.

    • tax deductions do not reduce net cost - because if net cost is lower, you'd get lower tax deductions!

      The calculus is on whether the net value gained for the cost is better even with the higher cost. E.g., a car that could be used for personal gain, but can be construed as a business car.

  • +1

    a tax deduction is something that means you get back the tax already deducted on the money earnt to buy it.
    Scenario assuming you are a PAYG employee
    You are buying a product for an extra $100 per month, $1200 for the year.
    50/50 split means that $600 is tax deductible
    Lets say you earn somewhere in the $45-120k pa bracket
    Your tax rate is
    $5,092 plus 32.5 cents for each $1 over $45,000 (as taken from ATO site linked below)

    That extra $1200 you spent will actually cost 1200-(0.325x600)=1005

    ATO link for tax brackets
    https://www.ato.gov.au/rates/individual-income-tax-rates/?=t…
    .

    • +2

      So you are still paying $83.75 of the $100 a month out of your own pocket.
      (It will be less if you are on a higher tax bracket)

      Tax deductible is not free, you still incur a cost, but the cost is reduced by the deductible amount.
      It is a question of whether the benefit to you is then worth this reduced cost.

  • +6

    Here’s a simple life lesson

    Assume you can never claim anything on tax. Then make your decision. You’ll be thinking clearer I promise

  • I tried to deduct my full internet bill but accountant said that it's unlikely to be accepted.

    Everyone has internet so you're likely to have it regardless of WFH, plus most plans are unlimited so not losing data by WFH.

    We dudceted a portion of the internet costs.

Login or Join to leave a comment