This was posted 1 year 11 months 7 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Seiko 5 SRPE63K Sports Watch $199 Delivered @ Starbuy

370
Seiko 5 SRPE63K Sports Watch $199 Delivered @ Starbuy
Go to Deal
rfc850 on 12/12/2022 - 10:37 starbuy.com.au (2476 clicks)
Last edited 12/12/2022 - 10:46 by 1 other user

Seiko 5 Sports Watch - model SRPE63K is on sale today as part of 1 Day StarDeal.

Includes free shipping, 3 Year warranty from Seiko (Australia).

Description

Seiko 5 Sports Mens Stainless Steel Case and Nylon Strap Automatic Movement Watch SRPE63K. Classic Look with the famous Seiko finish. Form and Function combine seamlessly with this timepiece from Seiko. The Stainless Steel case with the blue nylon strap is offest by the blue face dial with a Day & Date functionality and lumibrite hands and markers.

The Seiko 5 sports SRPE63K1 features the Seiko Automatic and Manual winding 24 Jewels movement hacking calibre 4R36 with an approximate power reserve of 41 hours and a daily time tolerance of +45 / -35 seconds. The case is 40mm with a thickness of 11.5mm and a lug-to-lug measurement of 44.6mm in stainless steel. This watch has a water resistance rating of 100m and an approximate weight of 75gm. Additional features include a screw case back, a see-through exhibition back, 24 jewels and a day and date function.

‘’5’’ represents the original five key features of every Seiko 5 still present today: Automatic movement, Day-date display, Water Resistance, Recessed crown and Durable case and bracelet.

Fashion & Apparel Seiko Watch

Related Stores

StarBuy
StarBuy

closed Comments

  • Orrelljet on 12/12/2022 - 10:42
    +2

    Very nice deal. A sapphire crystal is a worthy upgrade, especially at this price.

    • nitens on 12/12/2022 - 10:55

      This is hardlex glass, not sapphire. So I'm not sure what your point is.

      • rosebank on 12/12/2022 - 10:58

        That's what I was going to say, unless he wants to replace the hardlex with aftermarket sapphire on a $200 Seiko 5

        • Orrelljet on 12/12/2022 - 11:05
          +5

          That's precisely what I meant :-)

          • rosebank on 12/12/2022 - 11:13
            +3

            @Orrelljet: Why? I personally don't care about crystal type (I personally like domed acrylic or sapphire (if it's actually domed, and not a slight curve), and the only watch I own that has a significant deep scratch is sapphire, ironically), so why spend roughtly 50% of the cost of a cheap watch on an upgrade that practicaly makes no difference?

            • Orrelljet on 12/12/2022 - 11:18
              +2

              @rosebank: You personally don't care, does that mean I also shouldn't? Each to their own, I guess.

              • rosebank on 12/12/2022 - 11:21
                +1

                @Orrelljet: Go for it mate, are you doing other mods? I've modded SKXs in the past; it's a fun hobby. Just the crystal doesn't make sense to me, but like you said, each to their own

            • pennypacker on 12/12/2022 - 11:18
              +3

              @rosebank: It's a curious obsession, that's for sure.

            • LanceVance on 12/12/2022 - 11:27

              @rosebank: It's not something I'd bother to do, but I can see the appeal as there is definitely much less reflection with a Sapphire lens.

              • rosebank on 12/12/2022 - 11:39

                @LanceVance: Yes, with AR coatings that rub or scratch off (yes I know there's sapphire with only inner coating which is basically useless imo). I got my Sinn 856 UTC serviced with crystal replacement and it cost well over a grand. Plexi/Hexalite/Acrylic (which can be polished), sapphire, mineral, harlex, whatever - all have pros and cons. That's why I don't care about crystal type.

              • misu p on 12/12/2022 - 11:40
                +3

                @LanceVance: With my current Tuna I will keep the hardlex until it gets so scratched that I am bothered. So far so good…. no scratches. After it gets scratched I will try to replace it with sapphire. It may never happen :) who knows.

            • cactusjuice on 12/12/2022 - 12:36

              @rosebank: I found hardlex to scratch easier than sapphire. Meaning, for a daily watch which might go through some wear, sapphire should hold up better.

              • rosebank on 12/12/2022 - 13:10

                @cactusjuice: A Sinn 856 and Seiko SKX were my beater watches for a couple years. The tegimented coating on the case and bracelet held up surprisingly well on the 856, but the sapphire crystal was busted and had to be replaced. The SKX is built like a tank and only has a few small scratches on the hardlex, which I don't care about, or could replace myself for cheap. I treat my watches pretty bad; I bang them around and don't really baby them, no matter the cost.

                So my experience is different to yours, and I've already expalined why I don't care about crystal type.

            • ColonialBoy on 12/12/2022 - 21:47

              @rosebank: Sapphire crystals cost about $20.

              https://www.reddit.com/r/Seiko/comments/l3yp13/snkl28_swappe…

  • dynaflow on 12/12/2022 - 12:03

    It's big at 44.6mm.but a simple stylish design and Seiko quality….what's not to like?

    • WatchNerd on 12/12/2022 - 12:11

      What size is your wrist? Mine is just under 7 inches & my SKX007 fits perfect.

    • pennypacker on 12/12/2022 - 12:13
      +1

      Case is 40mm, lug to lug is 44.6mm fwiw

  • dynaflow on 12/12/2022 - 12:16

    Yes,but while this infatuation with big watches continues unabated I venture that 42mm.is a more generally accepted size irrespective of wrist measurement…..I maintain that 44.6mm.is a big watch.
    P.S.I stand corrected if the case is 40mm.according to @pennypacker

    • beebul on 12/12/2022 - 13:18
      +1

      It says 40mm in the description ⌚

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join