I am wondering which is better? I have a Mitsubishi Lancer VR-X 2008 Manual with 217km's on it. It also has a fair bit of sun damage on the roof and bonnet and some scratches and if I sold it where I live (Cairns) I think can get about $8k for it as another vehicle the same as mine was being sold for $10k with 192km's in Townsville on FB.
The market value for my vehicle is $2700 on Redbook but Suncorp offered me an agreed value of $5520. Strangely Suncorp is the only insurer that offered me an agreed value from their online quote system. If I go for the agreed value it will cost $140 extra compared to the cheapest market value comprehensive insurer I found which was PD insurance and you would think this would be a no brainer but the wording used from Suncorp is "maximum amount covered". Does this mean in the event of an expensive repair they can claim it as a writeoff and lowball me? In that case wouldn't I just be better off going with the market value since I am likely to be screwed going with the agreed value anyway?
Market value, there’s a little room to negotiate in the event of an incident.
(Your car isn’t worth $8k)