So i bought a property (so to say), engaged a conveyancer and they sent me a first letter to let me know the important dates etc like finance and building and pest etc.
I was told about these in an initial letter. come the finance and B&P date and we had to take an extension as we were not able to satisfy by the date. Before the next date, i confirmed to my Solicitor about the finance condition being satisfied. He decided not to tell the other solicitor about it until B&P has also been satisfied. when both got satisfied,
The seller has said that we breached the contract since finance condition had another deposit also to be paid which i obviously forgot as there were too many things going on.
They said the deposit was not paid and were not told so they would cancel the contract and keep my initial deposit.
As i understand, my solicitor sould tell me to pay the deposit when i mentioned to them that finance is approved with bank. i would expect the solicitor to tell me if i was going to breach the contract.
My solicitor says that i was told about it in the initial letter. they say they are not obligated to tell me every single thing that needs to be done
my question is, should the solicitor not have told me to pay the deposit? they are trying to put it on me and i believe they should have reminded me about the deposit when i told them that finance had been approved.
Am I right and if so, can i take action against the solicitor or just let the initial deposit go
the seller does not want to resolve under any circumstance and has now decided not to sell.
I have agreed to have the contract terminated.
my deposit is also being refunded. It was only $5k. The seller was looking for a reason to not sell. I didn’t want to buy from them being unhappy.
Thanks for all your responses - will surely adhere to the timelines in future. Learnt my lesson.
Buying a house and paying a negotiated deposit/s very shortly thereafter is not common sense?