USB-C Chargers often generate some controversy when posted here. I am curious as to what the wider community uses.
There are arguments made for first-party chargers such as quality of components, safety, quality of power, longevity.
The arguments for third party chargers (other than cost) would be that they all implement the PD standard and there is no perceivable difference when spending more. The arguments against third-party chargers based on reviews and feedback from Ozbargain users around way of failure, rates of failure and potential damage to expensive electronics.
Taking chargers of ~20W charger as an example, there is a fair amount of variation in price with an unbranded charger costing about $6 - $30. In general, all chargers are going to work - they do all implement the PD standard. The main differences would be in failure rates, quality of the power delivered, what happens in event of failure.
What do you choose and if you care to elaborate, why?
Besides general commentary, I am interested in:
- The opinion of anyone who has experience in an associated industry - electrical engineers, insurance, etc.
- Experiences of those with failed devices requiring insurance claims and the impact of uncertified chargers (Also any other experiences with failed overseas electronics requiring insurance would be interesting)
given the choice, i'll go with first party or reputable third party, it's often only $5 - $10 more, for a little peace of mind.
i'd probably choose reputable third party first, purely out of spite, as apple, samsung and the others stop offering the charging brick out of "environmental concern", yet fail to lower the prices accordingly to account for this, and charge extra on the side for a new one. if you're paying $600 + for a phone, you should be getting a charging brick included, or at least the option to redeem a "free" (not really, you paid for it) brick.