All Pants Besides from Underwear Should Have Pockets to Carry Small Things. Who Agrees?

Having no pockets whether going out or at home is so inconvenient.

Phone in pocket works well and reduce damage

No pocket, only hands inconvenient can't carry other things

Poll Options expired

  • 107
    Yes - All pants should have pockets to carry small things
  • 7
    No - I use my hands or use a bag to carry small things

Comments

  • +8

    What pants don’t have pockets??

    That being said, track pants should always have zip pockets

    • +5

      A lot bloody annoying

      Especially some pajamas

      Track pants with no pockets are the most stupid piece of clothing out there

      • +8

        "I just got some new pajamas with pockets in them. Which is great, because before that I used to have to hold stuff when I slept" - Demitri Martin

        • When you're lounging around the house in PJs, pockets are very handy to hold your earpods or phone and the like.

    • +7

      You, obviously, haven’t seen lady pants. Some don’t have pockets and some have token pockets. I like cargo pants because the pockets are huge and many.

      • +5

        😂😂 was going to comment that op must not have shopped women's clothing before

    • What pants don’t have pockets??

      https://aussiebum.imgix.net/content/items/4807_rugby_blitz_g… (link may not be suitable for work)

    • What pants don’t have pockets??

      Martial arts clothing doesn't have pockets because they are dangerous for fingers.

  • +5

    Stop being a poor ass and buy pants with pockets!

    • +2

      still waiting for them to go on clearance at Kmart for 50c

      • +1

        50centkmartpants can be your new username

        • Sounds like a winning name for a rapper 🤔

    • +1

      beat me to it! haha

    • +1

      I got a couple of those lockdown qantas packs, one with business class pajamas and one with first class pajamas. The first class ones have pockets and the business don't (also the business ones were crap and didn't last, I still use the first class set though)

      Even Qantas lets you know that you're a poor ass when flying with them, it seems. Want pockets? Need first class.

  • +2

    All Pants Besides from Underwear

    My underpants have a pocket in the front.

    NSFW Selfie

    • Yeah not a big enough pocket there 😆

      I have pairs of boxers with side pockets and add a very uncomfortable extra layer under jeans.

  • dont buy the cheapest pyjamas.

  • Grab a murse (man purse) to put your items in and don't forget the mun (man bun) ;)

    • +6

      Mokay (man ok)

    • Rightio bruz, do you also live in bankstown and is your murse a fake gucci one?

  • +4

    who needs pockets when u can look cool with a fanny pack

  • +1

    …think like a prisoner. anything can be used as a pocket

    • +1

      I think that's why the op wants pockets. OP's username suggests they have been using the jailbird technique.

    • +1

      you just stole ^ theyre joke and recycled it….badly.

        • its alright…just pointing out its less funnier the second time

  • offtopic/…Why Does This Site Insist on Capitalising Nearly Every Word In A Title For No Real Logical Reason? I Still Can't Work This Out?

    • +1

      It was an auto suggestion from the site when you make a new post

      • +1

        yeah i know…im asking why it does it?

        • It's because it's title.

          • @plmko: Go Find Another Site that Does This…As You Can See, It Really Is A Strange Formatting Style to Read.

  • +3

    Wait until you find out about the useless size of pockets that do exist on womens pants…

    Title should be

    All Pants Besides from Underwear Should Have Decent Sized Pockets to Carry Small Things. Who Agrees?

    • Coin pockets on jeans are pretty redundant now too.

  • +4

    Same applies for dresses

    • +2

      Yep. Welcome to the world of women's fashion where pockets imply carrying stuff outside a handbag or purse and we cant have that! 🙄

  • I think all pants do have pockets, if they don't they're just a form of tights.

    • Hmmm lots of Kmart pajama and down pants no pockets :(

      • It's slightly pricier than Kmart, but Target usually has some pyjama pants with pockets. Peter Alexander does too, but they cost ALOT more even when on sale.

  • +2

    I disagree… I think underpants should also have pockets.. #underpantspocketsmatter

    • Front pockets yes, side pockets absolutely NOT - they make it feel like you've got too many layers.

  • Underwear too. But no small things involved there…

  • +1

    Bumbag time

  • +1

    My underpants already have pockets which hold a small thing

    • Big thing in my case to go with my big hands!

      • hello Jerome

  • +1
  • +1

    I like big pockets and I can not lie

  • What is wrong in holding a hand inside ones undies?

  • When you go out in your PJs, just put your phone in your UGG boots.

  • cargopants ftw

Login or Join to leave a comment