Fun way to dip your toes in NFTs in particular if you love NBA/basketball!
I did check the rules and believe this type of post is allowed but happy to take it down if not.
Mod: Referral link removed as it's been added to the referral system below.
US$15 Credit for NBA Top Shot NFT after Buying Your First Moment NFT or Pack @ NBA Top Shot
80
Ljimboj13 on 26/05/2022 - 06:58 nbatopshot.com (132 clicks)
Last edited 26/05/2022 - 18:34 by 1 other user
Last edited 26/05/2022 - 18:34 by 1 other user
Referral Links
Referral: random (3)
US$15 Credit for NBA Top Shot NFT after Buying Your First Moment NFT or Pack. US$15 for referrer.
Related Stores
closed Comments
As a start
While the term NFT rings out to a lot of people as a picture of a monkey that is being sold for huge amounts of money it is actually just a proof of ownership for digital items. An NFT 'can' be used to show proof of ownership of a picture of a monkey but .. it could also be used by a new author sell copies of their new book, or maybe a gamer buys a digital version of a game and downloads it directly to their console but now because it was sold with a digital proof of ownership it can now be resold. Maybe you like sewing and buy patterns online - you may soon be able to buy the NFT of a pattern so that when you are done with it you can resell, maybe with a percentage of the money being forwarded to the original owner.
The idea that an NFT is a picture of a monkey might change soon and I would suggest that an open mind is a much better way of going into the future than a mind that may have said in the past … "A computer in your home ? what for?" "Bitcoin ? You cant even spend it" or "NBN ? Why would people need speeds like that ?" All of which seemed semi valid at the time.It doesn't show ownership in the monkey as the copyright isn't transferred in the transaction. If copyright is assigned (or other things) assigned in the contract, an actual contract is required not a smart contract (which is a terrible name as it isn't a contract at all).
When the NFT is sold to a third party, any contractual terms wouldn't follow unless agreed to by the original seller.
So no, it isn't a digital proof of ownership. It is a unique set of data on a blockchain which points to a digital thing on the internet. That's all it is.
It doesn't show ownership in the monkey as the copyright isn't transferred in the transaction. If copyright is assigned (or other things) assigned in the contract, an actual contract is required not a smart contract (which is a terrible name as it isn't a contract at all).
How can someone that practice law have NFI?
BAYC NFT hodlers owns the underlying asset and the work.
They can do whatever they want and when sold will transfer the same rights to the new BAYC NFT hodl.
Spamming referral thsts what this is called
Lolz
it's not against the rules
It kinda is though lol
Because you’re needlessly screwing up the environment with your virtual bs so you can make a quick buck.
Scotty doesn't allow gambling bargains on OzB…
Are nfts any different ;)
So I read the below from the rules and thought it was okay…but like I said happy to take it down if not…
Can I post a deal for the Referral offer itself?
If the retailer offers a referral program, you may post it as a deal (e.g. signup to ABC site via referral code and earn $10 credit) if all of the following conditions are met:
The referee also earns credit.
The current offer has NOT been posted as a deal previously.
It's a limited time referral offer or it's a new addition to the OzBargain referral system (added less than 7 days ago).
i think because it's a limited time "offer" you're technically ok to post…. what's the usual referral bonus?
Also probably doesn't help your case as a first post.
There hasn't been one until today.
Yep I get it and appreciate it's a bit cheeky being my first post but without the code you get zip ($0)…so there is some benefit should you choose to sign up…which I'm not forcing anyone too.
I am loving all the the keyboard warriors on here LOLZ ready to jump on someone that clearly states their benefit and says they're happy to take it down if against the rules…which appear to possibly be a little grey depending on what you read
So I read the below from the rules and thought it was okay…but like I said happy to take it down if not…
Yes, probably fine to post. But be prepared for everyone to hate it because it's NFTs. A perfectly valid reason to hate the 'deal'.
After all, paying any sort of money for something that's useless and worthless is not a deal.
Plenty of other arguments for people paying thousands, even millions of dollars for something both physical and/or digital that's useless or worthless.
Value is determined by the buyer and if someone's willing to pay money for it (whatever it is) then it has value.
Plenty of other arguments for people paying thousands, even millions of dollars for something both physical and/or digital that's useless or worthless.
Sure. And if i posted any of those on a bargains website, I'd be prepared for backlash.
@NigelTufnel: Oh they can backlash away, I couldn't care less tbh. I'm sure the same people complain about anything they don't actually understand, I just don't like misinformation being sprouted as truth.
Yes yes, how terrible of me telling people who choose to click on the link, how to get a $15US bonus…on a bargain site that allows these types of posts if they're first about it (as this was)…Complain away people, I mean isn't that what the internet is really for…
Hello Amway calling
This is honestly lower than an MLM scheme. Atleast you're getting a product with Amway.
But I can just right-click & save your NFT for free.
This must be the first generation in history that isn't smarter then the previous.
I never got what NFT's were until I saw someone post a simple explanation for it.
"Imagine everyone banging your wife because shes good looking, you don't really care though, you officially have the marriage certificate."
Humans sure are fascinating creatures.
Bahaha! That's hilarious and kind of a great analogy…I'd include the fact they are banging a poorer quality and unofficial version too if it's just the right click and save version
I get where you are coming from if it's just an image, but there's heaps of ways NFT's can be applied and these are actually minted digital videos. I'll be the first to admit this is kind of a silly collecting way and really just a bit of fun with a false market…but I wouldn't simplify NFTs in the way you have.
If you are keen to understand NFTs better you might want to read up more on the topic and digital ownership, blockchain etc or alternately don't and keep calling people "less smarter" for something you (from my observation) don't fully understand.But I totally understand it. The magical blockchain doesn't do anything. I get this is supposed to be the new trading cards. But trading cards are physical assets, you can't just print your own (easily), but these anyone who can view it, can make an exact copy for free. That takes the scarcity out if the equation which makes something value.
It's like selling handfuls of sand and salt water at a beach.
I'm sorry but I'm not sure you do get it. You can't always view an NFT if it's a private sale and not been published on the internet or there can be watermarks added etc.
You use an image (right click/copy) as a very simplified example but there's plenty of other applications for them. For example an NFT could be a minted digital song. What if you heard that your favourite musician had released a song but it's limited to only allowing X number of people to hold a digital copy and includes access to digital artwork/lyrics/video/concert tickets or other experiences etc. you name it really it can come with an NFT as it validates your ownership and therefore eligibility to whatever comes with holding that NFT. Sure someone could try and 'bootleg' the song itself, risking potential legal repercussions but also a bootleg version likely wouldn't be the same or give you access to all those other things…and wouldn't be the same if you're a true fan.
I'm not even a big NFT guy but the one thing I do really like about NFTs is it has the potential to take back some of the 'power' that many artists lost in this digital/pirating age, and artists essentially having their art stolen from them. If you are someone who is happy to steal from artists then I get why you wouldn't see the appeal though.
It's amazing how many people think the person who owns the NFT owns the actual digital thing. In most cases, they simply own basically a unique receipt linking to a digital thing. Where the NFT is procedurally created like Bored Apes, no copyright even exists as it was created by a computer.
So go and right click I say. You're not even taking it from the NFT owner as they never owned it in the first place.
Jimbo you used to be cool…
Nah :P
Oh wait this was a Simpsons reference - love it!!! :D
If this site starts promoting NFT's I'll never visit it again.
I got into this a year ago just to see if I could make some cash. Currently up $150 USD. Not making much, bit is a bit of fun if you're into the NBA.
Reminds me of the 90's, going to the newsagents spending my hard earned pocket money on a pack of cards and being thrilled by whatever I found inside - except now I get none of that
Thanks for the comment. Yeah I'm the same, have loaded about $30 in to my wallet and still have about $15 sitting in there and about 60 "moments" worth over $150 based on current sales.
Not sure why some people are hating on NFT's….perhaps that old adage that people hate what they don't understand?
I got pretty lucky early on and sold a few moments for around $50 USD each
I just threw $50 in the bin, which seems like a better buy.
NFT’s need to be banned.