Harry Potter X Everau Women's Flying Sneaker $69.00 Shipped @ Everau.com.au

21

Go to Deal

AssociatedLjasonbaby on 04/02/2022 - 13:28 everau.com.au (875 clicks)
Last edited 04/02/2022 - 13:46 by 1 other user

The flying sneaker is perfect for those quidditch matches both on and off the ground. Each sneaker represents the Hogwarts wizarding houses with a printed house badge, matching heel with Harry Potter logo, and an “HP” monogram printed on the tongue.

Genuine Leather Upper (Breathable)
Fabric Internal Lining
Anti-slip and durable rubber sole
Multi-Layered Latex, and memory foam insole for increased comfort, shock absorption, and durability
Daily Prophet Packaging
Each shoe features a House Colour and badge

Product No: EA5009

Amazing gift and deal for Harry Potter fan all over the world.

Don't miss this big big big sale. It will be OP ASAP.

You will love the quality and the design!

Related Stores

Everau

• 

  Euthyphro on 04/02/2022 - 13:32

  "Harry Potter Women's Flying Sneaker"? I thought that should be "Hermione Granger Women's Flying Sneaker".

  • 

    MasterScythe on 04/02/2022 - 15:52

    What am I missing? Is it a joke? Or jab?
    Cho, Ginny, and Madam Hooch are the 3 females 'known for flying' in the series.

• 

  [Deactivated] on 04/02/2022 - 13:43

  land fill

  • 

    mapax on 04/02/2022 - 13:47

    Because Harry Potter is trash or because you think these shoes will fall apart quickly?

  • 

    MasterScythe on 04/02/2022 - 14:59

    +1

    Everau isnt usually bad quality.
    Whats your opinion based on?

• 

  clubhonda on 04/02/2022 - 13:45

  $69 for a plain sneaker, and still 57% off? Good luck with sale..

  • 

    Hinee on 04/02/2022 - 13:47

    You're paying for the licence.

• 

  nosytt on 04/02/2022 - 13:53

  -3

  Why didn't the "wizards" just cast themselves out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

  Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

  a-at least the books were good though
  

  "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

  I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

  • 

    Hinee on 04/02/2022 - 14:04

    +10

    Do you need to sit down with someone and go over this? Sounds like you've got some stuff to work out.

  • 

    MeeMaw on 04/02/2022 - 14:30

    Ha seriously you’re quoting some knob literary critic called Harold Bloom from Yale writing for the LA Times back in 2013 this is not where I imagined these runners would take me.

    • 

      Hinee on 04/02/2022 - 14:40

      +1

      Well that changes everything. I do love me a good shitpost. You need a very high IQ to understand them.

  • 

    MasterScythe on 04/02/2022 - 15:18

    +1

    You need to be careful you dont speak opinion as fact, because it sounds big headed.

    In 1997, what was it competing with? Lemony Snicket was still 2 years away, goosebumps was aimed at a younger audience. Discworld was aimed at a slightly older audience, and "the classics" were already well read and re-read.

    There wasn't a lot of competition, and you cant deny the issues faced in each book, did grow with the reader (and the characters).

    Its akin to someone who watched Star Wars from episode 1-6 like I did. I thought the characters grew well, as the threat increased.
    Meanwhile people who watched 3-6,1-3 thought the 'start' of the story was childish and silly. Yeah, because it was just 'life' not 'life or death' yet.

    Many critics of HP seem to be comparing it to epics they've already read, aimed at much more advanced readers, or facing topics a primary schooler wouldnt have been able to grasp.

    Rowlings 'style' is a lack of detail. Its actually really hard to do well.
    Giving enough to paint a picture, with blanks your mind has to fill.

    Your 'stretched his legs' example is key; did he walk? Run? Jog? Skip? You decide; all you know is that he left the room using his legs.

    Its actually, imo, why the films werent as widely loved by the readers; it blew apart the world they'd invented for themselves.

    Its like watching any of the Terry Pratchett shows, after reading the books. The witches look wrong. The elephants are the wrong size, etc etc. The writing letting you invent a world, was 'broken' by a fixed image.

    Ill never try to convince people who dont like that style of writing, that "its good", because if you like accurate detailed writing, it'll never fit with your tastes.

    Lord of the Rings was a great example of 'too much detail in the writing' for some, but, for others, it was a masterpiece, and translated well to film thanks to that.

    But "the wizarding world" caught so many people, because kids imaginations are strong. And, turns out, so are a lot of adults. And after being force fed decades of "walking slowly, each footstep echoing against the hard walls", it was a nice change to get "stretching his legs down the empty stone hallway" and letting your mind swirl that into a non-specific reality.

    But that style is not for everyone, and thats OK.

• 

  iShibby on 04/02/2022 - 13:53

  +9

  Do these have good grip or will I be slytherin everywhere?

• 

  k_leb on 04/02/2022 - 14:02

  +1

  $50 here, with click and collect available:

  www.westfield.com.au/shop/product/2011/39cf1c7b-ed1c-4759-ad…

  A quick google shows a few other places at this price too.

• 

  gimli on 04/02/2022 - 14:04

  Cheaper elsewhere.

• 

  The Value on 04/02/2022 - 14:44

  You're a sneakerhead, Harry.

  • 

    ireadtermsofuse on 04/02/2022 - 15:30

    +1

    I’m a what?

• 

  ne-us on 04/02/2022 - 14:53

  I believe I can fly, I believe I can touch the sky…😃

• 

  LeonC on 04/02/2022 - 15:15

  Genuine Leather = Worst level of leather out there.

  Literally the capitalised G and L are for trademark term purposes. One of the oldest tricks in the trash leather goods world.