QCY G1 45ms Low Latency Gaming Earbuds US$37.37 (~A$51.76) Delivered @ QCY Official Store AliExpress

80

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

adr8 on 10/01/2022 - 17:38 aliexpress.com (360 clicks)
Last edited 12/01/2022 - 15:51 by 2 other users

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Early Bird Sale on the QCY G1 Gaming Earbuds at a massive 66% discount. Sale starts at 7pm.

More info QCY G1: New Gaming Earbuds Cyperpunk Lights Action Latency

Check out Scabir QCY G1 review: Capable gaming earbuds on the cheap! & Head-Fi for reviews.

Note: Title prices include GST & Shipping. Approximated AUD price, based on today's MasterCard rates, paying in USD

Related Stores

AliExpress

Marketplace

QCY Official Store

• 

  Fergy1987 on 10/01/2022 - 18:03

  After the QCY T7 debacle where they all showed up DOA, I'm slightly hesitant with the brand.

  • 

    rhimes on 10/01/2022 - 18:31

    Yeah, I can understand. I had a dead T7 and a working T5. I messaged them for the T7 and they replaced with a Q13 (which thankfully worked on arrival).

    • 

      HandsomeMonkey on 10/01/2022 - 18:41

      How do you message them from Amazon application? There's no contact details.

• 

  hellolord on 10/01/2022 - 18:09

  -1

  Never QCY

• 

  MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 18:13

  45ms?! No thanks. Not getting rid of my cable just yet, if thats "low latency". Rhythm gaming impossible.

  • 

    jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 18:16

    Yeah, this needs LE Audio to get latency down to decent levels.

  • 

    Jaduqimon on 10/01/2022 - 18:27

    -1

    The human ear can't detect more than 60ms.

    • 

      jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 19:32

      +1

      It's at most 13ms.

      • 

        MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 20:08

        +3

        I think it was a bad joke at the cost of console gamers about how the human eye apparently cant see more than 60fps, lol.

        • 

          jasswolf on 10/01/2022 - 20:24

          +1

          @MasterScythe: LOL you're right. I've genuinely seen people float numbers between 40-60 ms though, it's an irritating subject.

          • 

            MasterScythe on 10/01/2022 - 22:31

            +3

            @jasswolf: The reason numbers and reaction times and such are all useless, is because they're treated as binary events.

            They become WILDLY variable if its a predicted event.

            Just watch any rhythm gamer; "perfect" scores are within 5ms of a beat; and many can "Full Perfect" songs.

            You have a combination of queues, such as the previous beat, and a visual to help.

            Its one of the reasons why dubstep caught so many peoples ears; it was unpredictable and interesting to people who had been over exposed to 4:4 songs; now dub is overused, and the next thing will come along.

            Humans are weird.

            • 

              happykamper on 11/01/2022 - 07:21

              @MasterScythe: I think you mean "Combination of cues".

              Also, surely any decent rhythm game will let you calibrate to counter any delay anyway.

              • 

                MasterScythe on 11/01/2022 - 11:43

                @happykamper: I did, thank you.

                And yes, if this is a guaranteed exact 45ms, then it'd be usable.

                But often it varies, since BT is designed to adjust its packet size to the environment.

                I use some RF wireless headphones with my dance dance revolution machine, so I dont wake neighbours at 3am; and I was able to adjust the 24ms or so of those.

                But BT risks changing bitrate and such mid use… not sure I wanna risk that yet.