Hi All,
Had my FWD car in for service recently, front tyres have 20% tread and rear 40%. I asked for them to rotate them front to rear for even wear but they didn’t. I did some digging and turns out for this scenario having older tyres on the front is safer, so I just accepted it. Based upon newer tyres on the back to reduce oversteer while old ones on the front can increase understeer and the general thought is that understeer is better/less dangerous than oversteer.
Seems the old school of thought in rotating tyres front to back for even wear is flawed, perhaps its more about saving money than safety. Lets face it tyres are pretty cheap, so it seems if we were to optimise tyre replacement for safety, you should not rotate front to back but instead (starting with a new set) wait until the fronts are worn say 20% remaining etc and then move the rear to the front and put 2 new tyres always on the back. This obviously means you have to go to the tyre shop twice as often and only buy 2 tyres, but should be far safer and just as cost effective?
Interested to hear other peoples thoughts on this.
I follow this pattern on my FWD hatch and I get 90k-100k kms of even wear (90% regional highway driving) on kumho ecowings.
I rotate every 10k kms when I drop the oil. A trolley jack, 4 Jack stands, an impact driver and a torque wrench and I can do it in less than 15 minutes.