Hi all,
I know this has been discussed again and again (and again) on multiple threads, forums, and such. The consensus that I've seen so far is that novated leasing is good in certain scenarios but it seems to contradict what I've been calculating with my situation.
I just wanted to see if some (very nice) person could please check through my calculations to see if I've calculated correctly, or if there's anything I've missed.
So, I'm on the market to [most likely] get a Tesla Model 3, mostly because it's relatively affordable, nice to drive and fully electric which both me and my partner appreciate.
The RRP price for what we're looking for (as mentioned on the Tesla AU website) is $66,543 (in VIC) (which includes the paint job).
We're comparing Tesla's provided 2.99% APR financing option for 36 months (3 years) vs getting a novated lease through my partner's company (NLC).
NOTE: The comparison below uses 61,000 as RRP because NL says they didn't have the RRP on hand so they used a rough estimate of 61K
Financing:
[email protected] APR = $63852.66 over 3 years
+ 937 per year on tyres => $2811
+ 1000 per year cost of registration => $3000
+ 2000 per year on comprehensive insurance => $6000
total cost of ownership for 3 years => $75,663.66
Novated Lease:
pre-tax portion => $4897.44 per year
post-tax portion => $12200 per year
pre-tax delta loss on take-home pay => $2844.12 per year
+ post-tax portion => $12200 per year
multiply both by three + balloon of $28609.32 to get total cost of ownership over 3 years
= 28609.32 + (2844.12 * 3) + (12200 * 3) => $73,741.68
The budgets for running costs above may be a bit off but I was doing a like-for-like comparison as provided by NLC to better understand the difference, but at this rate, it does seem that NL is cheaper by $1,921.98, even though it's a 3-year lease? But most people are saying that anything after year 1 lease is not worth it?
It makes me really feel like I've calculated something wrong lol, any help would be appreciated!
EDIT:
For those that are wondering or end up coming to this post for information, I ended up getting the 2.99% APR finance option rather than a novated lease.
- It's actually worthwhile doing an NL in certain circumstances. This mostly would be if you were comparing the difference between a finance (loan) option against an NL; the NL will be cheaper in certain periods of time (eg 3 year loan). However, paying outright will always be the cheapest (of course).
- The reason I didn't go with an NL is because I didn't want my partner to have the pressure to not be able to change jobs or think about having to get the lease transferred, which I have heard from a couple people that this could be challenging. If we were unable to get the lease transferred when she takes on a new job, then we'd have to pay out the residual + a cancellation fee, making the whole NL completely pointless.
- The 2.99% APR is crazy low in comparison to most finances. When you compare 2.99% APR and the NL, the difference between the two is low enough that I'd rather just take the easy way out and be free to do whatever I want.
- Because I'm purchasing an electric vehicle, most of the costs that a traditional ICE car has is lost and hence cannot be claimed as part of the NL. Those would make up a big part of your pre-tax savings and hence again why it was not worth me taking up an NL.
Have you not read anything on ozbargain, novated leasing make no sense these days.