TL;DR: version: why does the Redbook value of a car not change when the sale price of similar cars has increased?
So I'll chalk this up to experience, but I've just been stung by the 'we only pay market value using the Redbook' response from my insurance company.
I asked them to show me a single for sale ad for a car like mine that was anywhere near that value and their response was 'that's not how this works'.
I know this, I know it's a typical story. What bugs me is they are using the value of the car to justify classing it as a write off. Which as the NRMA smash repair guy said was typical for older cars because they make a bucket of money reselling it whole or for parts. Okay it is what it is.
But it got me thinking. Who sets the Redbook value? When does it get set? My car has gone down in value according to them for the last two renewals, and yes I did ask for a better cover but they always said the maximum is market value. I was a bit dumb here, I thought if the advertised prices went up so did the value according to redbook.
So the last question I had was 'has anyone successfully challenged the valuation from an insurance company?
The reason I'm thinking of pursuing this is the Redbook value is $3K, I have some quotes I got myself that are around $1500, and my excess is $500 - so the car is being written off so they won't have to pay me $1k to fix it, but will pay $2.5k to write it off. I'm pretty sure it will be sold for a major profit, I mean the damage is to the nudge bar and one rear side panel.
If you are not happy with the figure, you have 2 choices….