Interesting Article about ShopBack’s Growth

https://www.afr.com/companies/retail/cashrewards-rival-shopb…

Cashrewards’ underwhelming sharemarket debut has not dented investor demand for the fast-growing cash-back sector, which has benefited from the shift to online shopping during the pandemic.

Cashrewards’ arch rival, Singapore-based start-up ShopBack, has raised another $55 million, after a $102 million raise in March last year, taking the total to more than $200 million.

ShopBack country manager Angus Muffet. “The opportunity is infinite,” he says of Australia.

ShopBack plans to invest the funds into acquiring new customers and merchant partners and developing new products to take advantage of strong growth in e-commerce, as well as the inevitable shift in spending back to bricks-and-mortar stores when lockdowns end.
Cash-back programs enable consumers to get a portion of their online and in-store purchases back and are used by retailers such as Coles, Amazon, The Iconic, Target and David Jones, travel companies such as Booking.com and food delivery services such as DoorDash and UberEats to attract new customers.

Over the past few months, Shopback Australia has launched a digital equivalent of the “stamp” card, which allows members to earn more when they shop with certain brands in stores, launched in-store cashback offers, product comparison functions and gift cards, and has doubled the size of its local team to 24 staff.

ShopBack has operations in nine markets, including Singapore, Malaysia,
Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and South Korea, and sees Australia as a key growth opportunity because cash-back sector is still in its infancy.

“The opportunity is infinite,” said country manager Angus Muffet.
“If you look at markets like the UK and the US, Australia is still massively underpenetrated – in Australia only 12 per cent of shoppers use some form of loyalty discount or cash back, in the UK it’s 35 per cent.”

ShopBack’s registered members in Australia grew by more than 50 per cent to 1.5 million in the 12 months ended June, active customers (those who have shopped on the site in the past 12 months) reached 458,822, and merchant numbers have risen to 2000 from 1200 in the last year.

Cashrewards shares halved
In comparison, Cashrewards has 1.1 million members in Australia, 260,000 active members, up from 178,000 a year ago, and 1700 merchants. Cashrewards shares have halved, falling from $1.73 to 81¢, since the company listed in December.

Across the Asia-Pacific, ShopBack has almost 30 million users and has driven more than $10 billion in revenue for more than 5000 merchant partners since inception.

The latest capital raising was syndicated in March but only lodged with regulatory authorities earlier this week after approval from the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board.

Investors included Temasek, East Ventures, EDBI, Indies Capital and Australia-Singapore based January Capital.
Mr Muffet said an initial public offering was a “natural path” for ShopBack but it had no current plans to float.

“Right now we’re focused on driving that market and acquiring world-class talent to help us do so and further enhancing products for customers and merchants,” he said.
Benjamin Dunphy of January Capital said the investment company had been ardent supporters of ShopBack since 2017.

“The team has proven time and again their ability to execute and innovate in the highly competitive e-commerce enablement space,” Mr Dunphy said. “We have high conviction that the company will continue to create massive value for partners, users and shareholders alike.”

Related Stores

ShopBack AU
ShopBack AU
Third-Party

Comments

  • +3

    “The opportunity is infinite,”

    Talking garbage.

    Able to raise money just means there is enough fools out there. Problem is going to be path to profitability. I'd suggest it is harder than people think otherwise if Shopback is driving $10bn in revenue then a 1% cut is $10m. I'd assume their cost is probably $5m per country (7 countries listed) means $35m a year which means they need to grow 3.5x and that is conservative.

    Uber needs to take 30% of every dollar to get UberEats to be profitable which fills in the cash black hole known as Uber (ride share).

    • +1

      All that needs to happen is a recession and all these companies will buckle and become worthless.

    • Your type of comments come around everytime their is a tech based company in growth phase. "Profit profit profit" but just can't understand they need to spend to grab market share whilst the market is still soft with competitors.

      I mean to even take your example, Uber is actually poised or close to being in profit and all it took was to turn off some market share discovery business lines, marketing/discounts and focus on high value customers.

      • The reason they are even close to being profitable is on the backs of their underpaid employees, if they were forced to pay a living wage their model would fold tomorrow.

        • Which obviously is false because the regions are flipping year by year from contractor to employee as the law finally catches and yet now we are hearing about profit? Weird, surely they'd profiting making at the start but then gradually become less profitable as the years go by no?

      • Your type of comments come around everytime their is a tech based company in growth phase. "Profit profit profit" but just can't understand they need to spend to grab market share whilst the market is still soft with competitors.

        Wasn't that the excuse during the dot com boom. Give it away for free, get unique users because they are worth something. We'll monetize them later.

        Without writing an essay the numbers speak for themselves. If you can direct $30bn of business to break even. If you have to do $60bn of business to make $35m. Historical multiples of 15x PE makes Shopback worth $420m. Apple did US$274bn of business in 2020.

        Good luck to the suckers left holding the bag at the end. Most of these businesses IPO or sold via trade sales is "find a mug punter" probably explains why I'm not rich. Can't bring myself to ripping off orphans, widows and pensioners of their hard earned cash.

        • Well cool, but I've read it all. The same doubt was casted on Xero to use a more Australian example. Zero profit but heavily spent on capital improvements and marketing…..now here we are a stellar blue chip tech company making profit.

          It's the same story over and over again.

          • +2

            @plmko: I don't think you actually understand business at all.

            Just because Shopback and Xero might be considered tech businesses they are two totally different sub sectors and segments.

            Shopback: business to consumer, it makes a commission, it depends on willingness of business to sign up and free users to buy. Barriers to entry, I'd say low. Competitor: Cashrewards. What is it's IP, is it worth something if sold, is there limited buyers. Users are actually the product (like facebook)

            Xero: business to business, it sells a subscription SaaS, there is no free to use, there is a tie in for customers and transfer to competitor is more difficult. It owns the intellectual property. Competitors: Sage, MYOB, SAP, Oracle. Is it's IP worth something if sold, because you have many competitors they might get involved in a bidding war.

            WeWork also called themselves a tech company.

            • @netjock: any thoughts on bnpl ?

              square paying $39b for afterpay , and there were like 6 others competing offers to buy afterpay.

              • @dcep:

                square paying $39b for afterpay , and there were like 6 others competing offers to buy afterpay.

                Square is going to issue more shares to pay for Afterpay. It is like Elon Musk using Tesla shareholder money to buy bitcoin. If it pay off execs get a big bonus, if it doesn't then shareholders help to bail them out.

                Value is based on what people think it is. 60% of M&As deals fail to deliver but everyone thinks they are part of the 40% that succeed.

                Facebook paid $14bn for Whatsapp. If you had $14bn do you think it would cost that much to develop the app, acquire users and build data harvesting and sell user data.

                Evergrande also ploughed a lot of money into the EV business which if you lump it with Tesla is tech. It isn't saving Evergrande right now.

              • +1

                @dcep: SQ has something that its competitors doesn't have. Its connection with Jack Dorsey, Cash App and Twitter.

                Twitter just activated tipping worldwide on iOS using the Lightning network. Jack is a BTC maxis and he will use his influence to integrate the LN payment rail into APT. It will be game over when that happens.

                SQ, TWTR and APT are all connected.
                https://youtu.be/k4dpZH50Quk?t=793

                • @rektrading: You are drawing too many conclusions there .

                  Mark Cuban's Mavericks is accepting Dogecoin what good did that make?

                  Twitter tipping BTC. You can have BTC tipping in Australia but we don't have a tipping culture.

    • 1% of 10 billion is 100 million last time I checked

      • Right. Revised they make $65m a year. 15x PE gives them a market cap of $975m. Even if I got it wrong by a factor of 10 it still doesn't look too good.

        Not to say some dogs make a good trade. Like Telstra. All tranches made good money initially just know when to get out.

  • The opportunity is infinite

    That's just flat out incorrect.

    • +2

      Can be infinite but limited in return of investment.

      Like sum of a geometric series can converge absolutely.

    • +4

      He is using hyperbole as I've told you a million times before.

  • +1

    “The team has proven time and again their ability to execute and innovate in the highly competitive e-commerce enablement space,”

    Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

  • +1

    including Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and South Korea

    FoMO is actually quite prevalent in Asia countries. People can get quite addicted to collecting bonus prizes and rewards stamps.

    Bandwagon Consumption Behavior.

    Are we that strong in that behaviour in Australia? Or might just the OzB subgroup?

    • Erm…have you seen the Woolies Ooshies promo. That went absolutely gangbusters…

  • enjoy :)

  • +1

    I hope this many millions of $$ makes their tracking better!!!

    • +1

      tracking

      Think about it for a second.

      I think the OzB community know how they were able to “make” the money…

    • +3

      Thought would make their cyber security better.

  • +2

    Maybe they can spend some money on security. I used to be a shopback member until late last year when they had the data breach and now my spam emails / phonecalls is through the roof

  • maybe we should email our concerns to Angus Muffet ??

  • +1

    I love an Angus Buffet.

  • +1

    “The opportunity is infinite,”

    translation: The number of new customers to screw over is infinite?

  • +3

    I'm surprised in the comparisons between ShopBack and CashRewards.

    ShopBack has consistently been a worse experience for me, whether its untracked rewards or a lack of customer support, or even the hacks earlier this year. CashRewards has been fantastic in comparison - if you're a customer surely you'd shy away from SB? That being said, I guess technically I would count as a customer for both as I am still signed up, even though I stopped using SB for a year or more now.

    • I agree, but every time SB offers a gift card with 10% like for ampol or Bunnings I can’t resist. It’s like free money.

      But my experience is similar, amazon flash sale purchases with both SB & CR. CR has paid me 2 weeks ago, and SB is still pending. The difference between them is noticeable.
      But that won’t stop me collecting the bonuses offered bySB

Login or Join to leave a comment