Hi, I am looking to upgrade from my 1999 Camry 2.2L.
I have a budget of $6000 and have narrowed down my options to these two cars . I was checking through Facebook Marketplace and found multiple listings of both cars. The Civic is a bit more expensive than the Mazda depending on year and km.
Which car do you think is better. If you have owned any of these and have information regarding cost of maintaining and common faults/issue please do let me know in the comments. I live in Victoria. (I think prices vary from state to state).
Thanks
If you are looking to buy a 15 year old car but can't work out for yourself what issues you might face, perhaps you should increase your budget and buy something newer. Otherwise you are likely to have expensive repair costs and you'll regret not waiting for your budget to grow a little before purchase.'
In reality, at 15 years many rubber and plastic parts inside the engine and around the running gear are brittle and cracked, let alone any wear parts. Both cars you've mentioned have been very reliable for the most part up to this point, but don't expect 5 years of trouble free running from this point forward. You can expect seals to leak, gaskets to be perished, problems with suspension etc.
In my view the crossover between lowest price and highest reliability is a Japanese brand under 10 years old and under 100,000kms.