As the title says :)
I'm looking at getting new runners - do you guys find $150+ shoes are "better" (by which I mean more comfortable and help avoid injuries) as compared to say $100 shoes?
Or to put it another way, do you find that it's worth paying more for a higher-end shoe?
I'm only ever going to be a light/casual runner (maybe 5K a few times a week)…no injuries so far…so I know I don't need top of the range. I'm thinking any shoe that fits and feels comfortable should do, but would be willing to pay more if there was some benefit.
I'm comparing low-mid range Asics and Mizunos ($120 - $200 here) to low-end models of other brands such as Adidas, Reebok, New Balance (around the $100 mark…as cheap as $50 but those ones were heavy and I wouldn't get them).
And I know this is Ozbargain but my question is not where can I get these cheaper(answer: endless/eastbay) but whether the "higher-end" shoes are worth getting at all.
For a 5K run, I doubt the shoe really matters. As long as they're designed for running you'll be fine.
Years ago (like 15-20 years ago), Choice magazine did a test of shoes with a range of Amateur athletes and found that Dunlop KT26 was the best shoe to everyone's surprise.