[Price Error] TP-LINK B22 Wi-Fi Dimmable Globes 2700K 800lm $5 Delivered (OOS) Multi Colour $5 + Del @ Catch/eBay Bing Lee

Shads on 21/06/2021 - 21:26
Last edited 24/06/2021 - 11:13 by 2 other users

Moved to Forum: Original Link

Be quick before it sells out… Both priced at $5 each, only the 2700 is free delivery. After picking up some wifi plugs from this deal. Found these also $5 so worth a go!

2700k 800lm
Multi coloured + Delivery

Edit: For anyone who wants the Multi grab it from Bings eBay store, as you pay a flat $6 fee regardless of quantity whereas postage on Catch increases with the quantity you order!

Edit2: As mentioned by Nickelback, if buying from eBay you can buy 4 and use AFTERPAY10 and only pay $16. :)

Mod: Price error, orders were cancelled/refunded.

General Discussion

Related Stores

Bing Lee
Bing Lee

Comments

      • Jay43 on 22/06/2021 - 20:40

        Why?

        • 9hundred on 22/06/2021 - 21:02
          -1

          you got your money back.

  • MARSAXV on 22/06/2021 - 20:20

    Buggers cancelled my order

    • 9hundred on 22/06/2021 - 21:03

      yep they played you for a fool

      • UncleRico on 22/06/2021 - 21:16

        You sound lonely tonight. Chins up…

        • 9hundred on 22/06/2021 - 22:02

          me so ronerrry

  • proudwanderer on 23/06/2021 - 11:46
    +2

    Hi XXXX,

    You have recently purchased a product from the Marketplace Seller, Bing Lee.

    We are writing to regretfully inform you that due to a technical pricing error, your order was cancelled in accordance with clause 8.7 of our terms and conditions.

    For your reference, a technical error occurred which resulted in items being priced at below cost.

    Please be advised that a full refund has been issued to your original payment method. Please allow 3 business days for the amount to appear on your statement.

    We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.

    -The Catch Team

    • ozbmm on 23/06/2021 - 16:48
      +2

      Yeah price error too

  • OZBholic on 23/06/2021 - 12:14
    +1

    cancelled my both orders saying out of stock… :(

  • hazzad on 23/06/2021 - 22:12
    -1

    I dont understand why online sellers arent bound to the same rules as bricks and mortar. If i walk into a store and the item is marked at a incorrect price then im entitled to that item at that price. Why are online store privy to a separate set of rules?

    • ce5himm on 23/06/2021 - 23:00

      It depends, like Amazon normally honor whatever "technical issue" they have

      • proudwanderer on 23/06/2021 - 23:10

        Yeh but that’s Amazon’s choice though. They aren’t “bound”. They can choose to not honour any time they want.

    • INFIDEL on 24/06/2021 - 13:21

      im entitled to that item at that price

      Lol - entitled!
      No you are not. Do a little checking.

      Under contract law, there is no agreement until both parties agree. You made an offer. Bing Lee didn't agree! So there was no contract of sale.

      (Catch only operates the marketplace you bought through. They usually just forward orders on to the seller. So may be unaware of shortages or changes.
      BL only offered these through a few stores, so stock levels were likely to be very limited. As there were thousands of clicks, there was not stock to meet such a demand for a clearance item!)

      Through consumer bodies, the most you could receive is a refund - which we will receive. (Unless there was a stated reason why they won't sell to you, eg Discrimination. I've won such a case.) They can't force a seller to sell.

      Why are online store privy to a separate set of rules?

      The b&m store may sell it at the lower price if they are generous, but they are not required to do that under law.
      There are often voluntary store or industry pricing policies they agreed to.

      Same with online - no difference.
      Some may sell at the listed price, or offer compensation if they can't.
      Online retailers state their rules in their t&c.

      Besides… When you checked out to buy this, you agreed with their t&c!!

      It is stated below the SUBMIT ORDER NOW button…
      By checking out, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions and to receive marketing communications from us that you can unsubscribe from by the functionality provided for in those communications.
      To see how we manage your personal information and other details, please see our Privacy Policy and Collection Statement

      • McFly on 03/07/2021 - 23:03

        Discrimination. I've won such a case.

        Surely it would be legal to discriminate against people like you!

        • INFIDEL on 04/07/2021 - 00:12
          -1

          "people like you!"
          I'll see you in court!💰

          That is what that business found to their costs. They had argued that an Australian business couldn't be found to have discriminated against me, when refusing service or a sale, based on my nationality - Australian.

          (If they had simply said no, there would be no discrimination, and no case.)
          The relevant law differs in different Jurisdictions.

          In the State I took the case in, it was against the law to discriminate against "people like you!" - based on Nationality.
          In the Federal Court (my other option), my case would not have won, as discrimination based on Nationality was not against the law (at least at that time).

          'Won' the case very quickly! (Settled in Arbitration) Got everything I asked for. The business obviously wanted to avoid adverse publicity of a court finding against them. It was still an expensive outcome for them! (Details are covered by a Non Disclosure Agreement.)

          Was supported by a State Anti-Discrimination Commision, as the case was in the public interest. And by other businesses who were affected due to the discriminatory behaviour by that larger business. Others have benefited from the outcome, as a model procedure in similar cases.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join