I think I have a basic understanding of how afterpay works (happy for critique):
- the selling company sells a product at normal price (e.g., $100) with delayed payment (accounts receivable)
- Afterpay buys payment obligation (e.g., for $97) and sells to someone with ability to manage effectively (for $98, makes a buck)
- Company agrees to selling at $97 because they get sales channel that wouldn't have otherwise been there, and sales still have margin
I appreciate the high fees for missing payments is a source of revenue but from what I have read this is not the core model.
Assuming above, I can't understand how someone paying upfront isnt getting a bad deal, and should deserve a discount. Like, if as a consumer I should make a rational decision and use Afterpay because its just better to defer payments.
All consumers should do this, but then why not just sell to us for $98 for payment on sale and cut out all this nonsense…
Or are most of Afterpay customers really living from paycheck to paycheck with their non-discretionary consumption and need this service? This model baffles me… mostly because I think if I can pay upfront then why shouldnt I be entitled to a discount?
Would love your thoughts.
Cheers
The value for the business is the additional customers who could not have otherwise or was unwilling to to pay for the full amount upfront.
Customers get a credit line. Besides straight discounting the product would not attract the same customers and would probably cheapen the product instead of making it appear more affordable