Sign up to be one of the first to try Whole Earth’s delicious NEW sugar replacements! Choose from raw, icing or brown sugar to try in your next cup of coffee or bake into your next recipe.
Whole Earth is the ultimate low-calorie, organic sugar replacement so sign up to try before they’re gone!
Me either. Can’t find any page that actually signs up to anything or mentions free sample.
Click the picture, a pop-up window to sign up will show up
I did and it doesn’t. I just get a products page. I click on each product and no sign up.
Oh , also I'm stupid and lazy and didn't see it's Brown sugar aswell…
Okay well, be sure it's natural 'brown sugar' , the processed one is also bad.
But yeah I was talking about Stivia and other chemicals 🥲
Stevia isnt a derived chemical…its a natural product from the stevia plant
Thank you for educating me, I didn't say its a chemical, I said AND other chemicals :)
sugar is healthy ,
It is?
It is and it is not. The context is in moderation: too much water will kill you as well.
maybe it was a Borat joke… we may have to wait for the
………………….. NAAAT!
i'm joking… the comment mentioned in moderation :)
Very healthy , yessirey.
It fuels you and your cells, makes you happy and gives you healthy amount of energy.
Almost everything in nature has some form of sugar in it!
It is still heaps healthier than whatever artificial alternative we know of as of today.
"Most of the time the body cannot process these replacements and it becomes stubborn fat in the body"
Sorry, but this is wrong. Most of the time the body does easily break these down
Artificial Sweeteners and whatever other products fall under that category cannot be broken down by the body 🤗
If it can't be broken down by the body, then how is it converting it into "stubborn fat"?
Can you tell me the process in which it become Stubborn fat??
"The researchers in this latest study found that the artificial sweetener, sucralose, commonly found in diet foods and drinks, increases GLUT4 in these cells and promotes the accumulation of fat. These changes are associated with an increased risk of becoming obese."
🤗
Yeah, cool, that refers to artificial sweetener which the stuff from the deal does not contain.
It's made of Erythritol and Stevia, which are both natural and have nothing to do with sucralose.
Thanks for confirming that everything you posted here is bullshit.
@Grippit: While that poster (Kundi) has near zero idea what they're talking about, sugar (sucrose) isn't inherently unhealthy, it's just a disaccharide of Glucose and Fructose. Glucose is absolutely essential for cellular function (your body will make it in an absence of dietary glucose) and fructose is readily converted to both glucose and lactate.
What is 'unhealthy' is an excess of sugar, much like anything.
A single study was done in mice (where most studies stay as they don't translate to humans), and the conclusion of the articles you copy and pasted is that there is not enough evidence and that sweeteners are overall healthy.
If you don't understand science or have a mind incapable of critical analysis, stop spreading your opinion.
Not true
Yes it was. Can't remember what was the last freebie from Facebook Ashley received previously.
So i left it with these details and just received it addressed to N00b 😅
Don't tell me people put icing sugar in their coffee.
INGREDIENTS
Sweeteners (erythritol, organic steviol glycosides 7%).
Sounds delicious.
Dates are probably the only healthy solution to sweeten up your meal
I tried it but she wont go out with me!
How so? A single date is around 70%-80% sugar
I use honey and it tastes even better compared to sugar.
Just because it’s not cane sugar doesn’t mean it makes any difference. Your body is basically going to treat it the same way.
The only advantage honey and dates have is that they may contain some additional nutrients. Otherwise, they’re mostly just sugar.
If you want a “healthy” sweetener (i.e. a lower calorie content), you really can’t go past sugar alcohols and stevia (which this product contains). Other than the potential mild laxative effect of sugar alcohols, they’re fine.
But personally, I just have normal sugar in very small quantities.
Yeah stevia, monk fruit and sugar alcohols seem to be the right choice if choosing an artificial sweetener - but like you I also just have a tiny bit of normal sugar when needed (which is just 1/3rd a teaspoon in the morning tea). I should switch to honey for that and will.
I did recently purchase a large can of monk fruit sweetener that was on super special (having never purchased artificial sweetener before) with the idea that I could bake some shortbread cookies using it and almond/coconut flour as a substitute for grain flour. Low carb, sweet and buttery shortbread.. mmmmmmmmmm
Thanks OP
preservatives and artificial, no good for healthy
No preservatives it's as natural as sugar. It's made in a similar way extracting it from monk fruit whereas sugar is extracted from cane.
With what we know now about sugar, monk fruit derived sweeteners are significantly healthier than sugar.
cane well a village cane is good for health. It is called "Naatu Chakkarai" please google out what it means, you will see the images and information about it. That is NOT sugar.
Any complementary product of sweetners are again not good. Maybe relatively OK but still not good
I was obviously talking about sugar cane, which is where sugar that we have in stores is made/extracted from.
@[Deactivated]: Naatu Sarkara appears a less processed sugar made from the sugar cane, like brown sugar. It's not healthy.
Please research monk fruit sweeteners. They don't have preservatives as you originally wrote, nor are they artificial (anymore than Naatu Sarkara is).
@studentl0an: Yes, I agree with you partially. However, it also have essential minerals, no impurities, no processing. Lot of them use this in cooking and or eating as side dish. I myself I have never used this for coffee or beverages but as a side for pancackes (Kind of a mixed lentil pancakes).
https://www.amazon.in/Naatu-Sakkarai-Organically-Processed-C…
You can read about its features in "About this item" information in the link above.
@[Deactivated]: Another name for Naatu Sarkara is Jaggery. In the link below you will be able to see the nutrient breakdown of different processed sugars including Naatu Sarkara (as Jaggery). Note that while Naatu Sarkara is a less processed sugar with more minerals, it still contains 9.7g sugar per 10g serving. That's still a lot of sugar, and it's the sugar that is the unhealthy part. Naatu Sarkara is healthier than white sugar, but IMO not as healthy as monk fruit sweeteners.
https://www.24mantra.com/blogs/organic-food/know-the-differe…
@studentl0an: Yes Naatu Sarka is Jaggery, I completely agree with you. However, jaggeries again are of few types, and this naatu sarkara jaggery is better out of other types, and is what I bought recently and use as side for pancakes (Dosa type made of mixed lentils).
Ok yes sweetners are better they say but there are also articles and videos where they prove sweetners are again aritifical or equivalently bad too.
@[Deactivated]: It really depends on the sweetener. Some are made from nasty chemicals, some are made from natural extracts such as this monk fruit one.
In Roman times lead salt (in the form of acetate) was added to foods to make them taste sweet. We used to use lead to sweeten food before we realised it was a poison! It's one of the reasons historians believe Caesar was infertile, due to the high amount of lead he ingested.
Can I suggest to watch this video on a breakdown of nearly 20 sweeteners on how they are made and the effects on the human body: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3mNYwBqgkA
@studentl0an: Thank you for sharing the insights, quite interesting, will watch the video too; yes you are right, depends on sweetners; I was just told sweetners are bad equivalently but perhaps they didn't talk to this depth of different types of sweetners.
I am more of a splenda or it's generic substitutes, which has no laxative effect or bitter aftertaste. It is sugar modified so it is 600 times sweeter. Not "natural", but also great tasting and not harmful.
Sucralose (splenda) is one of the worst artificial sweeteners for us because it can feed the bad bacteria and kill the goods ones in our gut.
"All 6 isolates had fewer colony forming units (CFUs) on the media exposed to sucralose than they had on the positive control groups of M9 sucrose and M9 glucose"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866777/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artificial-sweete…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3mNYwBqgkA
Everything is good in moderation.
Can someone post the direct link for signup page? For the life of me, I cant seem to find one.
Click the picture, a pop-up window to sign up will show up
I couldn't get it to work on mobile web, even when ticking desktop mode. Opening it w Facebook app worked.
Do we get 1 grain or a whole pack
Coconut sugar is probably the only best tasting healthy alternative to sugar.
Thanks Op
Thanks op. Also liked the free health judgements in the chat.
Thanks op. had to use desktop to get it to work in case anyone else has issues.
If I click sign up it does not take me to the sign up page.