Is a Solar System Health Check Worth It 3 Years after Install?

Got an email from solargain this week to do a healthcheck of my solar. Rang up for a quote on cost (single story house- metro area) $220 - takes them less than 2 hrs to complete. I have noticed cable ties becoming undone since the installation when I poked my head up to clean it once a year.
Has anyone done a solar health check by solargain before? Is it worth doing? What is your expeirence like? Seems expensive for what it is.

3kw solar system installed for 3 years now(2018) in Perth metro.
* 3.18 kW Solar Power System
System Components
* 12 x Q-CELLS Q.PRO 265 G4
* 1 x Growatt 3000 MTL Dual MPPT

Total Year Generation:
2018 - 5422.6kWh
2019 - 5640.7kWh
2020 - 5348.5kWh

When I signed up their paperwork said the expected Annual Yield is: 5079.1kWh
So it is meeting it's expected yield.

Once a year I might get "PV input insulation impedance too low.Mainly the Ground line has not been connected or impendance between PV1 and PV-(PV2 and PV-) is too low.". Solargain came ancd checked and said nothign awry could be found.

Email:
Hi xxx,

We believe your solar system may be due for a health check. Our low cost health check ensures your system is operating safely and at maximum efficiency.

A complete solar health check makes sure of the following:

kWh production of the system meets the expected output
The integrity of the wiring and wiring enclosures to ensure that no damage has been caused by heat, vermin or other forces.
The array modules are free of defects or damage
Junction boxes are water tight and free from moisture ingress
All associated switches and circuit breakers are operational and all terminations are secure
Safety warning labels are intact and legible

Comments

  • wait 1 more i think 4 years is a good checking point

  • Sounds like an opportunity for them to find problems out of warranty and bill you for them. Why didnt they want to do the health check before the labour warranty expired?

    • Still under warranty:
      Growatt Inverter: 5 years
      Q.Cells Warranty: 12yr Manufacturing (inc. Labour) + 25yr Performance

      • +1

        The installation labour isnt under warranty so:

        The integrity of the wiring and wiring enclosures to ensure that no damage has been caused by heat, vermin or other forces.
        The array modules are free of defects or damage
        Junction boxes are water tight and free from moisture ingress
        All associated switches and circuit breakers are operational and all terminations are secure
        Safety warning labels are intact and legible

        All out of warranty.

        • Good point. The cable ties snap and silocone they use to ensure moisture doesn't get in will dry up as well after 2 -3 Australian summers.
          I guess they are going up to there to do those kind of maintainace works, they should have use something more durable that last longer.

  • The price is cheap as they have to travel to you and back to their depot or other jobs and someone has to pay for this. As for checking did they find the cable ties you spotted were coming undone in the report or did they fix them? If they did neither then what do you expect them to find if you found it and they did not!

    • Wasn't in their report. I saw them broken last year when I went up for a pre summer clean. I might look for a stronger UV resistant cable tie and provide it to them to use instead of those standard cheapo ones they use that will break in another 2 years. Curious to know what other companies charge.

  • +1

    Expensive, but https://www.kf7p.com/KF7P/Grip_Lock_Ties.html are aviation-rated.

    I went shares with a few mates to reduce the freight cost.
    We are Amateur Radio Operators with long coaxial cable and catenary runs in direct sun.

    I use them on runs of coaxial cable as the "UV-proof" ones sold here in Oz break and fall off within a couple of years.

    The Grip Lock Ties have been up for ages with no problem and can be released/re-tensioned/re-used.

  • +1

    If there was something wrong with the solar system I'm sure NASA/the scientists on the ISS would tell us.

  • Is your system still producing to specification? If so, no inspection is needed.

  • I'm interested in your Total Year Generation figures.

    I have 2.03kw of panels going through a 3kw inverter and only produced 1501kwh last year as reported via AGL. Living in Brisbane with just partial shade over some of the panels very late in the afternoon. My system was installed around 2014 but has produced similar output over the 7 years.

    How are your figures reported?

    Your system seems to be producing just over double what mine would produce if I had the same kw of panels.
    Your system produces 1705kwh per yer per kw of panel
    My system produces 739kwh per yer per kw of panel.

    Anyone else care to input their system/results?

    • +2

      https://pvoutput.org/region.jsp?country=1 is a good source of stats how other systems around the country perform. You can dive down to your neighbourhood as well.

      https://pvoutput.org/listmap.jsp?sid=73671 shows
      systems around Perth area (assuming that's where OP lives). At a glance, they have average efficiency about 4.5kWh/kW per day

      https://pvoutput.org/listmap.jsp?sid=38841 shows systems around Brisbane area. At a glance, they have average efficiency about 3-4kWh/kW per day

      OP system:

      5348.5kWh / 365 days = avg 14.65kWh per day

      14.65kWh /3.18kW = 4.6 kWh/kW efficiency, which is achievable.

      Your system:

      1501kWh / 365 days = avg 4.11kWh per day

      4.11kWh / 2.03kW = 2.02 kWh/kW efficiency, which is a bit low.

      Are you on gross feed in, which mean AGL reports total generation? Or are you on net feed in, which reports total export?

      • Thank you for the links.

        With such varying results it makes me wonder if some solar installers are installing inferior panels or just saying they're a certain wattage panel and installing a panel of lesser wattage?

        I can see my FIT is 52cents (locked in when installed in 2012, 2014 was incorrect in my 1st post) per kWh but not sure if it's gross or net. I guess gross as I can see generated income from power minus the power usage costs equals my bill.

        • With such varying results it makes me wonder if some solar installers are installing inferior panels or just saying they're a certain wattage panel and installing a panel of lesser wattage?

          A way for us to check is to find the peak power your system generate in summer, ideally on a cool clear day.

          Next is really look at your output in 5 mins internal. For my neighbourhood, I find the panel orientation makes a big difference in the variation. Mine is NW, and I lose about 10% of efficiency in winter compare to a N facing system. Looking deeper, mine has shorter sunshine hour and here gets cloudier in the afternoon during winter. I find that while my system tolerance heats better, the gain is little compare to my neighbours performance.

  • Peak power was 1.45kw. I have a 10 Degree pitch on the roof and panels are facing North East as per picture. https://imgur.com/a/yc0mRx2

  • You can do a simple health check of your solar system by looking at the color of the lights shining on the box during daylight hours when the system is running. A green light on your inverter means your system is functioning properly. A red or orange light during daylight hours means there's a system event or fault

Login or Join to leave a comment