Quick timeline:
Dec 10: Bought mouse from Kogan - direct import from the UK with expected dispatch of 1-2 weeks. Product page mirrored this equivalent model.
Dec 10 PayPal confirmation
Dec 28: Contacted support for update.
Dec 28: Support contacted warehouse.
Jan 6: Kogan emails updated expected dispatch to Jan 29, but product page shows dispatch is likelier Feb 1 or later
No explanation for delay, no offer to cancel order either, or ship equivalent model.
I get the feeling by the pre-sale indicator on the current product page that Kogan have delayed my order so they can dropship in bulk, surely there are protections against business practices like this - taking payment and selling items you don't actually have in stock.
Accepting payment without intending to supply
Under the Australian Consumer Law, businesses must not accept payment for products or services if:
they do not intend to supply them
they intend to supply materially different products or services
they know, or should have known, they would not be able to supply the products or services within the timeframe indicated or if no timeframe was provided, within a reasonable time.
This part of the law is not intended to cover businesses who genuinely try to meet supply agreements, for example, if:the failure to supply was due to something beyond their control, including the act or omission by another person
they exercised due diligence and took reasonable precautions.
I've contacted Kogan for further information on the source of the delay, but pending their response, who is the best source to make complaint regarding this - just the ACCC (I was under the impression their process is more for dispute resolution than straight-up complaints regarding business practices)?
edit: I should add that this order was fulfilled by Kogan, and not another business utilising their shopfront.
thanks for you info.