This was posted 4 years 9 months 20 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Free Course (Digital) - The Resurrection of Jesus – Dr. Gary Habermas @ Credo Courses

359
Free Course (Digital) - The Resurrection of Jesus – Dr. Gary Habermas @ Credo Courses
Go to Deal
gto21 on 27/02/2020 - 20:22 credocourses.com (266 clicks)
Last edited 27/02/2020 - 20:36

If you aren't interested in Credo Courses deals you can simply hide that store from your deal feed.

https://www.ozbargain.com.au/wiki/help:faq_beginner?#how_can…

Gary Habermas' course on the historicity of the Resurrection is FREE this Easter.

Included:
1. Digital Video (normally $199)
2. Digital Audio (normally $99)
3. PowerPoint (normally $49.99)
4. Digital Workbook (normally $14.99)

Here is a list of the course sessions:

The Importance of the Resurrection of Jesus
A Priori Objections (Part 1)
A Priori Objections (Part 1)
Principles of Historiography
Methodology: How Do We Use Historiography in Apologetics
Approaching Scripture
Minimal Facts Method
Preaching before Completion of the New Testament
Naturalistic Theories: Alternative Explanations for the Resurrection
Naturalistic Theory 1: The Disciples Stole the Body
Naturalistic Theory 2: Someone Else Stole the Body
Naturalistic Theory 3: The Swoon Theory
Naturalistic Theory 4: The Hallucination Theory
Naturalistic Theory 5: The Copycat Theory
Supernatural Alternative Theories
Categorical Problems with Naturalistic Theories
Understanding the Mind of a Skeptic
Changing the Skeptical Mindset of the Naturalist (Part 1)
Changing the Skeptical Mindset of the Naturalist (Part 2)
Evidence for the Death of Jesus
Evidence for the Appearances of Jesus
Evidence for the Empty Tomb
Constructing a Historical Timeline
Apologetics: Building a Bridge from Miracles to Christianity
Apologetics: Establishing a Connection between the Resurrection and the Existence of God
Who Did Jesus Think He Was? Establishing the Deity of Christ
Grounding Theology (Part 1)
Grounding Theology (Part 2)
Grounding Christian Practice: Application Based on the Resurrection
The Resurrection of Jesus

Gary Habermas is considered one of the premier scholars in the Resurrection of Jesus studies. He is known by both liberal and conservative alike for his vast knowledge of historical method, his ability to answer skeptics thoughtfully, and present a cumulative case argument to the central truth of the Christian faith.

This is our gift to you this Easter.

No strings.

No tricks.

No kidding!

Feel free to share in as many ways as you can!

Use this in your small groups, Sunday School, lesson preparation, or personal study.

Education

Related Stores

Credo Courses
Credo Courses

closed Comments

                      • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 16:34
                        +2

                        @gto21: Wow YOU have not answerd one of my questions..not one…
                        Ignoring them all…anyway divert divert divert. Nothing but nosense bit like religion.lets get down to basic problem… anyway
                        "I never said that homosexual is less than me. You don't have a point. So you're making up stuff."

                        Yes you have, when you say they shoudnt marry, when you say their an abomination, when you say its not natural, when you say its a choice, they shouldn't be able to raise kids. I can go on and on…THAT IS you saying they are below you..

                        Ps i given up on you answering any of my questions…1 maybe please..im starting to get bored

                        • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 16:59
                          -1

                          @bugman: Can you stop diverting and answer my question on bestiality? Maybe you think your superior to people who want to have sex with animals. Can they marry? Can they have sex? Can they raise children? Is it natural? Let see how long you last with this argument. My guess you will divert because it's another flawed argument.

                          • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 17:56
                            +1

                            @gto21: Diverting??? You are the one that have not answerd any of my questions..not one. Didnt reply to my people less then you???. Not 1…… Answered plenty of yours. Sex with animals and humans have anything to do with this.? Stay on topic. Are you saying its natural? It like saying women can vote?? Whats next my fish can vote. Just stick to topic…

                            It ok.. i know you have been brain washed from an early age.. its ok..need a hug?

                            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 18:01
                              -1

                              @bugman: I can make the same argument homosexuality is not discussed in the course. But yet the pro-sodomite activist brings it up. Answer the question, stop diverting. For the fourth time, answer the questions on bestiality. You have no answer.

                              • kale chips suck on 28/02/2020 - 19:43
                                +3

                                @gto21: You need help.

                                • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 19:46
                                  -1

                                  @kale chips suck: Yes I need an answer from this guy. Since he can't defend his position. Maybe you can help defend it for him.

                                  • kale chips suck on 28/02/2020 - 20:46
                                    +2

                                    @gto21: When you stop projecting.

                                    • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 22:34
                                      -1

                                      @kale chips suck: I guess that mean you can't help.

                                      • kale chips suck on 28/02/2020 - 22:40
                                        +1

                                        @gto21: For once I agree with you.

                                        • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 22:52
                                          -1

                                          @kale chips suck: I could not care less if you agree or not.

                                          • kale chips suck on 28/02/2020 - 23:40
                                            +2

                                            @gto21: Yes, that's very clear from your comments thoughout this thread. You're obviously not invested in any way in whether people agree with you or not. That's the very last thing any sane person would infer from your miasma of incomprehensible dribble.

                                            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 23:46
                                              -1

                                              @kale chips suck: Let me check if I care about your opinion. Oops sorry, I still don't care. But feel free to reply again. I know you want my attention.

      • tromboc on 28/02/2020 - 21:33
        +1

        Even if only one person downloads it and watches it. I'll keep doing it. It's worth it.

        Do you get some sort of referral bonus or something? Are you associated? Don't forget to advertise if you're somehow associated with the propaganda you're soliciting. Details how are in the help section.

        • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 23:05
          -1

          If one person downloads the course it's worth it. If you think it's about a bonus. It must be a huge bonus per person. Yeah, sure it must be a bonus or something lol.

          • tromboc on 28/02/2020 - 23:12
            +1

            @gto21: Worth it to who? You need to be upfront if you get some sort of referral or if you're affiliated. There's rules…

            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 23:25
              -1

              @tromboc: I really want to be sarcastic based on the previous comment. However, I have the feeling one mod might think I'm serious.

              • tromboc on 29/02/2020 - 01:44
                +1

                @gto21: Are you affiliated with this religion? Do you receive some sort of higher reward for converting us heathens? You really should be upfront about that.

                OzB is no place for sarcasm.

                • gto21 on 29/02/2020 - 01:54
                  -1

                  @tromboc: If I was associated with Credo courses I would click on associate. Can you please stop asking me stupid questions.

                  • tromboc on 29/02/2020 - 05:32
                    +2

                    @gto21: Wow are you denying jesus in the street? Is your name Peter? As a believer don't you get extra gold stars for turning more zombies before you die?

                    This went right over your head didn't it.

  • Diji1 on 27/02/2020 - 22:03
    +1

    Praise be unto Allah!

    • jv on 28/02/2020 - 01:39
      +2

      You do know that Muslims revere Jesus as a holy prophet. Right?

  • Ok computer on 27/02/2020 - 22:15
    +4

    Jesus resurrected Man City's Champions League chances this morning. Not sure he will he able to perform miracles to get them off the two year ban though!

  • igordennis on 27/02/2020 - 22:29
    +3

    I was tempted to neg this deal because this is absolutely not a bargain (lol), but the hilarious comments made it worth.

  • [Deactivated] on 27/02/2020 - 22:39
    +1

    I have a degree in Apologetics. My wife always ends up forgiving me!

  • bugman on 27/02/2020 - 22:40
    +11

    Does anyone think people actually ever pay that price..for digital files?..Come on…what a con…dvd still $299….this is not a bargin

  • jeffrufino on 27/02/2020 - 23:12
    -1

    epic, thanks!

  • sr20vet on 28/02/2020 - 00:38
    +2

    The f#$@ is this sh!t?)

  • senectus on 28/02/2020 - 00:53
    +9

    this isn't a deal or a bargin.

    Its proselytizing

  • Merlict on 28/02/2020 - 01:00
    +8

    I don't think any human has ever paid full price for this ever. Not a bargain.

    • jv on 28/02/2020 - 01:38
      +2

      What about the apostles?

  • Draupnir on 28/02/2020 - 02:53
    +5

    Negged for normalising a book that calls for gay people to be executed.

    • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 03:52
      +1

      It doesn't. https://www.gotquestions.org/homosexuality-death-penalty.htm…

      It does record an account of events when that was true. As for us now, there seems to be a lot of laws in the past that seem crazy.

      • Wampus on 28/02/2020 - 07:08
        +5

        Yeah, you're using a link that literally says, amongst other rubbish:

        "Homosexuality is still immoral and unnatural" and "homosexuality as an abomination, an immoral perversion of God’s created order"

        So without entering into a theological debate with a stranger on the internet, I'll just suggest you stop and keep this putrid nonsense to yourself.

        • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 07:43
          -1

          I'd say it's more of a moral issue. It's surprising that others just simply consider it unquestionably morally right. The rest of world doesn't seem to have the same view.

        • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 09:45
          -4

          He has the right to do it. Just like someone else have the right to be a pro-sodomite activist if they want. Since you believe you have the right to say "keep this putrid nonsense to yourself". As a result, we can tell others "to keep their putird nonsense to themself". Some of us don't want to join the pro-sodomite activist movement. Based on your own logic, can you keep it for yourself?

          • Wampus on 28/02/2020 - 09:53
            +4

            @gto21: " pro-sodomite activist movement" ????????????????????????????

            Wtf seriously

            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 10:02
              -1

              @Wampus: You forgot to answer the question at the end.

          • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 13:02
            +2

            @gto21: Keeping it to yourself kinda means not putting it on a public website for all to see. Doing so, would in turn open you up to (well deserved) criticism.

            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 13:07
              -1

              @TheDukeOfNukem: Well he commenting on a public website. Same thing will happen to him. I have no problem with criticism. If he can say keep it for yourself. We can also tell him to keep his comment for himself.

              • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 17:58
                +1

                @gto21: Except they didn't initiate any of this, you did.

                When you start something, you can expect feedback. If they want to do a post about telling your religion to (profanity) off, you are for sure allowed to tell them to (profanity) off, however, they are yet to do so, so no, you can't really use the "keep it to yourself" argument when you're the one saying stuff in the first place.

                • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 18:12
                  -2

                  @TheDukeOfNukem: I don't care who initiate it. If someone use bad arguments it will backfire on them. Just like "a few" and "target market" were bad arguments.

                  • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 18:17
                    +1

                    @gto21: Not only were they not bad arguments, they were actually kind of irrefutable arguments, and not only did you have no actual defense for them.

                    But it was you initiating it there too. Now I know people of your faith aren't very good at looking at history and like to pick and choose what they believe, but I think you can manage to scroll back up a couple hours and see I'm right.

                    Who's a good little boy, you're a good boy, yes you are, you can do it, scroll like a good little boi.

                    • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 18:48
                      -1

                      @TheDukeOfNukem: Amazing argument which shows around half your deal should not be on ozbargain.

                      When I showed why your argument is weak. You come up with another excuse and still, you have a deal which will fail your own standard.

                      To be honest both arguments are flawed on several levels. But I was generous to only show you how your own logic backfires on you.

                      Nothing personal. We have other complaining but they have deals doing worst than yours.

                      Your just unlockly haha.

      • brongz on 28/02/2020 - 07:25
        +1

        Are you suggesting that the book is full of crazy ideas? Or people being crazy nowadays?🤔

        • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 07:41

          I'm saying a lot of laws in the past just seem unbelievable compared to today eg. You'd think slavery would have ended before the 1860's.

          • xerot on 28/02/2020 - 12:42
            +1

            @ozhunter: Did Jesus condemn slavery when he had his chance?

            • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 12:59
              -1

              @xerot: Since he approves of the old testament law. Which say do not steal and do not lie. The slavery your referring is kidnapping people and lying by saying White people are superior to black people. The "slavery" in the bible, a better translation would be servent. The type of slavery you mention are most practise by people who are against the bible.

              • rakeem on 28/02/2020 - 21:43
                +1

                @gto21: what you mean white christian plantation owners ? :P

                • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 22:39
                  -1

                  @rakeem: You realise not only white and "Christians" had slave? Lol Did you know that or you're ignorant of history?

                  • rakeem on 28/02/2020 - 23:49
                    +1

                    @gto21: actually i do realise that and no im not ignorant of history…i leave that up to the so called christians who ignore their own history and just make up what they want it to be.
                    its easy to tell you dont have a point when you straight away resort to trying to antagonise peole rather than be rational
                    is you next comment gonna be that i am not being rational and this proves your point ?
                    coz that sems to be the extent of your ability to make an arguement. very predictable.

                    • gto21 on 29/02/2020 - 00:11
                      -1

                      @rakeem: So why do you only mention white and Christians? Maybe you only mention Christians because of the post. But what's your point on white people? What's your view?

            • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 23:29

              @xerot: No, but this is what the Bible says about it https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-slavery.html

  • bailbondsh on 28/02/2020 - 08:02

    they are just words people

    • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 08:39
      +1

      They are just a group of people saying another group of people are unnatural abominations, their words.

      (profanity) 'em.

      • Wally on 28/02/2020 - 09:48

        Is the Muslim use of the word 'Infidels' more acceptable!?

        • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 13:03

          Nope, (profanity) all religion tbh

          • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 17:55

            @TheDukeOfNukem: Sorry, my phone dropped internet and I didn't realize and hit post a couple times, cheers for cleaning it up whoever did.

      • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 19:42

        Does it actually say that?

        You know the Bible states that fornication is also wrong.

    • rakeem on 28/02/2020 - 21:45
      +1

      just words that have gotten counless people killed, maimed, had their lives ruined ?
      yep..just words :D

  • Wampus on 28/02/2020 - 09:55
    +6

    Wasn't going to neg it, but ffs, it's not a deal in any way, shape or form, even leaving the incredibly flawed "morality" arguments aside

  • ubcool on 28/02/2020 - 10:48
    +1

    wasting hours of your time listing to this dribble is not a bargain.

    • bailbondsh on 29/02/2020 - 13:52

      entertainment, history, comedy, philosophy, asking oneself questions, even if 99% of them are "silly" or "archaic" who knows you might even learn about your own past as a human in the process.

  • SanAndreas23 on 28/02/2020 - 12:52
    +3

    How the F##% does this have 35 upvotes is my question!?

  • KingPhil on 28/02/2020 - 14:18

    1) To not believe that Jesus existed is like saying that Napoleon never existed. There is reliable evidence for Jesus' existence. Every decent scholar including athiest scholars acknowledge this.
    2) Just because you don't want something to be true, does not make it untrue. You may not want to believe in atoms which you can't see, but just because you don't believe in it does not make it untrue.
    3) An athiest believes two of the dumbest things I've ever heard: That something can come from nothing, and that mind can come from matter (think a rock magically appearing out of nothing, then growing a brain). All observable scientific evidence shows that both those things are not possible. But if you dismiss the existence of God, then that's what you're left believing.

    The real question is, if Christianity was true, would you believe it? Because on the basis of all the evidence, it certainly is.
    Find out who Jesus really is rather than looking at all the bad examples of Christians.

    • PSEACT on 28/02/2020 - 14:32
      +1

      Lord have mercy

    • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 15:34
      +1

      Lol brain washed much….two of the dumbest things. Dummer than…a man in the sky looking down on YOU making sure your good…the world's 2000 old..wait….a great flood. ill save 2 of EVERY animal on my big wooden boat..should i go on? I can all day…also the big bang has been proven..what was before the big bang is the question.

      So you believe dumbest things is something coming from nothing…so where did god come from??

      • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 16:53
        +1

        You thought Christians believe that the earth is 2000 years old. Did you think of that because of the calendar? 2000 years is from the time of Jesus was born. If you're going to call people dumb to make sure you make a strong argument. Their's two views YEC and OEC. Even some YEC don't deny the age given by scientist For instance, one theory among YEC is that everything was created with age.

        This one is regarding your other question. https://youtu.be/EWiEVNqKhRc

        • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 17:34

          Ahh duuuu yeah.. you that thick? Clearly talking about the bible which estimates the earth being 2000-6000 years old. As with everything in the bible its very inconsistent.

          Also its funny how relgions only agree with science when there is overwelming evidence. Wait we will change our story now…earth is old… evolution maybe true…black people are not born sinners ect..

          • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 17:55

            @bugman: That truth bomb hit harder than the big bang.

          • ozhunter on 28/02/2020 - 23:51

            @bugman:

            Clearly talking about the bible which estimates the earth being 2000-6000 years old.

            That's like based on scholar's estimates. Could be years off, could me many thousands ff. No one considers the age of the Earth a critical belief to have. The Bible doesn't say the age.

            Out of curiosity, do you genuinely believe that everything formed by chance? Like when you look at the human body and it has two arms and two legs each with 5 fingers and 5 toes respectively. What would have caused us to evolve that way? You think it had no design involved whatsoever? It's all coincidence? Just a guess, but it sounds like there would billions or even trillions of possibilities if evolution was true.

            • gto21 on 29/02/2020 - 00:31

              @ozhunter: His estimate misrepresents the vast majority of Christians. Even among the YEC, it's a misrepresentation. It's generally from 6000 to 10 000. Instead of admitting writing 2000 was a mistake. He then changed it claiming he meant 2000 to 6000. I think he's confusing the birth of Jesus and creation. Not all YEC denies the age that scientist gives. For instance, one branch of YEC believes everything is created with age. Not to mention you have OEC as well.

              Both theology and science are done by fallible human beings. Our salvation does not depends if your YEC or OEC.

      • KingPhil on 28/02/2020 - 18:23

        Ummm… It's called Big Bang THEORY, so no, not proven. But let's say it is. What was before the big bang had to be space less, timeless and immaterial. Sounds like God! And of course God didn't come from something, otherwise he wouldn't be God!

        And pulling narrative stories from the Old Testament doesn't disprove God.

        There are more things, even in the present world, that can't be explained unless God exists then uncertainties that you can pull from the stories in Genesis.

        • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 18:46

          The big bang theory has been proven again and again…there was big bang ..that is fact..

          Theory of gravity …cant prove it because its a theory? …why me not floating …mmm

          • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 18:50

            @bugman: Did you know before the big bang became the dominant view people like you were saying that the steady-state theory was the "truth". If you were born a few years ago, you would try to convince us that the steady-state theory has been proven over and over again.

            • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 18:53
              +1

              @gto21: Listen THERE was a big bang…fact… it can be proven…ffs. what was before the big bang is still up for debate. Stop talking about something you have no idea about …

              • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 19:13

                @bugman: Not according to many scientists not so long ago. In a few years, maybe you will come up with another theory. And claim the big bang was up for debate lol.

                • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 19:51
                  +1

                  @gto21: Wow….it..is ….a fact…it can be proven unlike your fairy tale..ffs

                  • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 19:59

                    @bugman: The big bang is not an issue. Even if it's true we know who bang it. Whereas you believe in the fairytale that the big bang came from nothing. Try hard all your life you create something out of nothing. After a few years, you will realise it's nonsense.

              • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 19:38

                @bugman: If someone tells you a mobile phone was created from nothing. No one designed it. The software and hardware just appear out of nothing. Will you believe that person?

                • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 19:58
                  +1

                  @gto21: But a god coming from nothing we are ment to go…ok ..that make sense…..double standards much???

                  Unlike you, i can admit, i dont know what happend pre big bang. Maybe there was a god, maybe the sun god or the thousands of other gods people have believed in the past.

                  • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 20:01

                    @bugman: Just answer my question on mobile phone stop diverting.

                    • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 20:24
                      +1

                      @gto21: You just proved my point….the only difference is i beleive in ONE less god than you. You lol at another god creating the big bang LIKE another god from nothing HOW ridicules. BUT my god of course he did that he can come from nothing. The sun god how stuiped do you have to be to beleieve the sun god is real. BUT my god is in the sky now making sure i dont touch myself and he is real trust me. This 2000 year old book told me…

                      Ps i did answer your questions.. you still havent answered one of mine…not one…

                      Pss nice one deleting the part about you lol at the sun god..lol nice one

                  • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 20:07
                    -1

                    @bugman: Watch the video I posted. That question shows you fail to understand the concept of God. It's not a double standard.

                    • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 20:51
                      +1

                      @gto21: You know what a concept is yeah??
                      "Concepts are defined as abstract ideas or general notions that occur in the mind, in speech, or in thought."

                      I would agree nothing fact based.

                      • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 21:11
                        -1

                        @bugman: Based on your logic we should question gravity and psychology since according to you it will not be based on facts lol

                        "an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances"
                        - the basic concepts of psychology
                        - the concept of gravity

                        https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/notion

                      • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 21:22
                        -2

                        @bugman: No point talking to you. You keep diverting, not answering any questions. You can't prove homosexuality is right or wrong in your worldview. Even in your worldview it's wrong. You can't answer a simple question on bestiality. Is it really that hard to answer? Lol I can it's disgusting. Your world view is so perverted you can't answer. Since you know it will backfire on you.

                        You can't defend the fairytale that everything is created from nothing. You been avoiding the question I asked on mobile phone. You know it's irrational.

                        I don't have enough faith to be an atheist. Goodbye :)

                        • bugman on 28/02/2020 - 21:50
                          +2

                          @gto21: Dude you didnt answer one question the whole time… divert much??? I present questions no response. You just go a divert talk about random stuff. I present facts ignored.

                          Anyway ill have fun burning in hell..wish me luck

  • TheDukeOfNukem on 28/02/2020 - 15:41

    Almost wanna upvote for getting me through both my breaks at work today.

    Almost.

  • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 17:05

    Who created God? https://youtu.be/EWiEVNqKhRc

  • dreamscene on 28/02/2020 - 17:06
    +4

    Guys guys guys….relax. Calm down. There is no God. Chill.

  • gto21 on 28/02/2020 - 22:53
    -1

    Is Religion the Cause of Most Wars? https://youtu.be/oHoiJj8iSCE

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join