Need to update STATISTICS page...

Just to tell mods…

If you can't find any posts to moderate over… how about updating the STATISTICs page!

I just went to that page to see where Twinings Samples were on the chart but they weren't there… so HUH???

Suggestion: isn't there an automated system for the list to be created?

Anyway… Statistics give the motivation for posters to actually POST!

Mod: The stats page is ranked historically. http://www.ozbargain.com.au/stats.

*Reply to Mod: Sorry, did not see the word historically. I still believe we should have an ALL-TIME votes list. An All-time list would be better than a 180 days one because you cannot see 2010 posts. Maybe you could even have a year-post e.g 2011, 2010, 2009 etc.

*So why would this benefit ozBargain? Don't really know, but wouldn't it be nice if people used this as a historical source e.g showing changes in prices of USBs, interesting changes in prices when a line is discontinued (HP TouchPad) etc. Note: i'm just saying possibilities.

Comments

  • +2

    Use the talk to a mod feature instead of whining to the world!

  • You mean this page?—>LINKY

    In order for another deal to make it on the list it must beat this

    Hence even if it has 30 deals(beating the deal with 27 +) it will not make it as
    -In 2007, there were not as many people on Ozb as there was now

    Also you will notice that from bottom to top, it is in chronically order

  • then they should make a new one!!!!!!!!! one that differs to what issh said!

    so one where it would have a normal stacking… as in ranking on actually votes and not collective stacking.

    • +3

      Well you could at least ask properly. No need for all the capitalized words, exclamation points, and questions marks. Your post makes you seem childish.

      • geez whats the point of a forum when you can't express however you like… childish, serious, troll… the internet is a world of random possibilities! Good or bad! oh and ever thought that exclamation marks can make you sound optimistic?

    • maybe something like what reddit has
      Image of Reddit's Ranking System
      This will enable you to see the top post of-
      -This Hour
      -Today
      -This Week
      -This Month
      -All Time

      Of course, this is really unnecessary as it really isn't needed

      • Why unnecessary? (unnecessary means not needed)

        Rankings like these can (note: possible) increase posts as posters may look for more decent posts to achieve a high rank in these charts.

  • oh, I see the title now. It is HISTORICAL, therefore the list is in the right order. But I still stand on my point; why can't we have a chart where they are not in historical order, so an all-time page of the popular tab?

  • As you stated, it's historical. If you want the best ranked deals over the past 180 days (or other time periods), http://www.ozbargain.com.au/deals/popular?days=180

  • hmmm… just so you know, there is no link to a 180 days version until you passed the link. If there was, it was not where it would have been easily found. I would expect it to be in the "Most voted deals from the last" column

  • +1

    I'm a big stats fan but anything over 90 days is not very useful for bargain hunters as almost all of the deals are expired. Let's see if Scott/Moocher can or want to make an all-time list. Hint: Best to ask nicely for things instead of having a go at the moderators and others here.

  • sorry if you think i'm being aggressive… :) (smileys always work……. i think…)

  • It was initially capped at 180 days (although without a link) is to limit the scope of searching. I can easily make a link that shows most popular deals from all times, although it would not be as useful as you would think.

    OzBargain is still a growing community and recent deals will get more votes than order deals. A very good offer 3 years ago would probably get less votes than our everyday front page deal. Does that make it a worse deal? Not really.

    • Total votes for the deal/average no. of votes for all deals posted during 180 days prior, would be a better way to gauge a deal's "value".

Login or Join to leave a comment