I've been researching this latest wizz-bang version of surround sound, where you get immersed in sound not only next to and behind you, but from above. However, I'm curious to know how many people think it's worthwhile paying for the very latest soundbars and TVs required to get the most from Dolby Atmos - or whether the "almost as good" approach is essentially the same anyway.
To get Dolby Atmos you need:
- Dolby Atmos hardware eg soundbar with upward firing speakers, or actual ceiling mounted speakers (I'm in an apartment - pass) and ideally actual rear speakers (I've found the bounce-of-walls doesn't work well unless your walls and doors are close enough to your sofa for you to hear the bounced sound)
- if you want it on Netflix, a Premium subscription AND a TV that can natively do Dolby Atmos (admittedly most from 2018 should)
To get the very best Dolby Atmos, you need
- a source eg TV AND output eg soundbar/receiver that have "eARC", not just regular ARC. ie you needthe new HDMI 2.1 protocol that allows a lot more data to pass through. Only some 2019 devices have this, which means even if you buy, say, a new eARC soundbar next year, your 2018 LG B8 OLED doesn't have eARC so you won't get full Atmos anyway.
This suggests to me that you can get an older Dolby Atmos hardware solution (say, older Atmos soundbars or TVs without eARC) and you'll get some overhead sound that won't be wildly worse than if you splurged on Netflix premium and the very latest eARC compatible soundbars and TV. Am I wrong?
Firstly, I doubt it would be worth it for a soundbar. I am yet to see a soundbar that comes close to offering even a moderately convincing surround sound.
But, if you enjoy action movies, and don't already have a surround sound setup, then may be worth making sure to get supporting gear.