Police State Australia: Metadata Database Open to Anyone with A Court Order

In 2015 The Liberal Party passed metadata legislation which forces ISP to hold every citizen's metadata for two years. The legislation was passed on the last day that Parliment sat so almost no media covered it, and no one voted for it, but no doubt people who like boot licking will vote for the Liberal Party again.

After all , they got in after invading Iraq so clearly there is no accountability at the ballot box thanks to compulsory voting which forces people who don't care to vote. If you don't care you then you don't have a grasp of anything that you're voting for.

Metadata is more intrusive than actual content of communications. When the legislation was passed the government claimed it had strict controls over who would have access to the metadata and that only police agencies would be allowed access. However later on it amended the act to allow any entity with a court order to access the database.

The Communications Alliance, an association of ISPs who are forced to hand out their customers private metadata by the legislation, released a list of over 80 bodies that made requests for metadata with a court order.

Australian Crime Commission
Australian Border Force
ACLEI
AFP
AFP ACT Policing
AFP PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
AFSA
ASIC
Australian Tax Office
Australia Post Corporate Security Group
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
BANKSTOWN CITY COUNCIL
BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL
CENTRELINK
CONSUMER & BUSINESS AFFAIRS – VIC
Corrections Intelligence Group – NSW
CRIME AND MISCONDUCT COMMISSION
Customs
Department of Agriculture
Department of Defence
Department of Environment and Conservation WA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, JOBS, TRANSPORT & RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
DEPT FAIR TRADING NSW
DEPT FAIR TRADING-BRISBANE
DEPT OF COMMERCE WA
DEPT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICES
DIBP BRISBANE
DIBP CANBERRA
DIBP MELBOURNE
DIBP QLD
DIBP SYDNEY
FACS
FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL
FAIR WORK BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
HEALTHCARE COMPLAINTS COMMISSIONS
IBAC
ICAC SYDNEY
NSW CC
NSW EPA
NSW Office of State Revenue
NSW Police
NSW POLICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
NSW Government Trade, Investment, Resources and Energy
NT POLICE
NTPOL
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT & HERITAGE
OFFICE OF STATE REVENUE NSW
Police Integrity Commission – NSW
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND RESOURCES SA
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES NSW
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES QLD
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES VIC
QLD Department of Fair Trading
QLD TRANSPORT
Queensland Police Service
Racing Integrity VIC
REGIONAL ILLEGAL DUMPING SQUAD
Rockdale City Council
SA FISHERIES
SA ICAC
SA POLICE ANTI CORRUPTION
SA POLICE INTERNAL INVESTIGATION BRANCH
SA POLICE STATE INTELLIGENCE
TAS POLICE
TAS POLICE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS
Taxi Services Commission
TRANSPORT ACCIDENT COMMISSION MELBOURNE
VIC DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, JOBS, TRANSPORT AND RESOURCES
VIC Department of Justice
VIC Department of Health and Human Services
VIC POLICE ETHICAL STANDARDS
VIC INSTITUTE OF TEACHING
VIC POLICE
VIC Sheriff’s Offices
WA CCC
WA Department of Fair Trading
WA FISHERIES
WA POLICE STATE INTELLIGENCE DIVISION
Work Safe VIC
WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY

https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/11/14/sub87.pdf

Volumes of requests were not able to be established and the list is incomplete. It's understood that many of these agencies made hundreds of requests with court orders.

I see some people claiming China is a terrible country for operating a police state. I guess these people are the same ones that will vote for the same two parties that operate a police state in Australia.

Comments

  • +2

    No affiliation but figured these might be relevant:

    https://nordvpn.com/servers/australia/

    https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/

    • VPN providers can also be required to turn on logging by court orders.

      Or they could be logging anyway… who checks that they aren't?

      • +1

        They could be, but since neither of these are based in Australia (or the US?), they're fairly immune to Australian court orders, and there is no benefit to them in logging any activity if they are not required to (they certainly can't sell it, so there is no upside to them at all).

        At the end of the day, is this an 100% guarantee? No, absolutely not. Is this pretty much the most you can do, without living completely without access to internet? Pretty much.

        • +1

          I switched to PIA for this reason; was using TunnelBear but since they were bought out by MacAfee (a US company) then there was no guarantee of privacy.

  • However later on it amended the act to allow any entity with a court order to access the database.

    I wonder what terms & conditions are required to get that court order to access …. if at all can be acquired by you or me!

  • +1

    If I had have guessed at councils accessing this database, Fairfield and Bankstown would have been two guesses at the top of my list.

  • +4

    Compulsory voting is the best thing we have going for us. It stops the extremists having too great an influence because Australians, generally, tend to vote either side of centrist. There are a couple of "OMG what" politicians out there but they tend to be restricted to outliner electorates and are, often, restricted to the senate. Given some of the Governments that are elected in non compulsory voting countries - I will stick with our current system thanks. If people don't want to vote they can always draw the traditional "cock and balls" on the ballot. (Thank Deity, we don't have a write in candidate system or "cock and balls" might get in one day.)

    Dude, if you want to be taken seriously I would roll back the abusive hyperbole. You have a valid point to make here but it is caged in such aggressive language most people are going to dismiss it out of hand as another 'rant". Lay out, logically, what "reasons" these guys put forward when this was legislated and detail why it would be considered a bad idea. I'm sure that list of who has access could be linked to save space in your post .

    Personally I'm uneasy about the use of Metadata and I'm not on the Governments "hit list" of who is likely to be targetted. There are issues of what the data will be used for, how likely someone is to be swept into the net when a family member or acquaintance goes "rogue, who has access, the cost, and the, ever present, risk of the data being hacked.

  • -1

    OP reminds me of this guy:

    https://youtu.be/3rRzjbtoBSU

    (Incase that doesn't entice you to click, it is about a flat earther issuing a $100k challenge. Another user, Wolfie, posted a rebutal that unequivocally completed his challenge. Of course, flatearthers don't see it as completed.)

    • Drop the ball!

    • wow, just wow
      .

  • Can we use this to get our politicians metadata?

  • the amendment to the tia act was covered by mainstream media before, during and after the vote. everyone that needed to know about it did.

    it's been 4 years and we're still happy calling, texting and surfing without any major inconveniences.

  • It will be interesting in the not too distant future when cops pumping all this metadata into AI that decides what people are worthy of police attention.

  • It's a high-stakes Jenga game.
    The pretexts to justify new security laws of the past 20 years were BS with varying degrees of State complicity. They will ultimately be repealed.

    Despite himself admitting last week that the lone-wolf bit of street theatre couldn't be predicted, in the next sentence Dutton expressed the urgent need for encryption-breaking legislation.
    Then we (very conveniently) have some arrests…very noisy and splashed all over the news.

    What's delicious is that most of these arrests are meaningless and fruitless. Courts usually throw the cases out for lack of evidence.
    You can bet that will be presented in a very subdued manner.

  • Would switching to Cloudflare's DNS make any difference against this?

Login or Join to leave a comment