This was posted 13 years 9 months 10 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Dell UltraSharp 22" 2209WA $230 from Dell Outlet

170
Dell UltraSharp 22" 2209WA $230 from Dell OutletAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
Pbaozhu on 12/02/2011 - 12:36 www1.ap.dell.com (1488 clicks)
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Connectivity
Video input type: VGA, DVI
Display
Screen type: Active matrix - TFT LCD
Panel type: e-IPS
Faceplate coating: Antiglare with hard-coating 3H
Backlight: CCFL (6 U-lamp) direct backlight system
Brightness: 300 cd/m2
Claimed viewing angle: (horizontal)178 degrees
Claimed viewing angle: (vertical)178 degrees
Contrast ratio: 1000 :1
Dot pitch: 0.282 mm
Max resolution: 1680 x 1050 pixels
Monitor size: (diagonal)22 inch
Pixel response time: 6 ms
Color depth: 16.7 million colors
Color Gamut: 83%*
General
Colour: Midnight Grey
Dimensions: (W x D x H)20.15''(51 cm) x 7.25''(18 cm) x 14.24''(36 cm)
Weight: 7.93 kg
4 USB ports
Height-adjustable stand and built-in cable management
VESA-compliant mount (100 mm)
Electrical
Voltage Required: AC 100 to 240 VAC / 50 or 60 Hz + 3 Hz / 2.0A (maximum)
Power Consumption Operational: 52 Watts (typical)
Power Consumption Stand by / Sleep: Less than 1 Watts
Audio Output: DC power connector for optional Dell Soundbar

12 left at time of posting, as always only 1 year warranty because it's from the dell outlet.

Computing 22inch Computer Peripheral Dell LCD Monitor

Related Stores

Dell
Dell

closed Comments

  • Trance N Dance on 12/02/2011 - 12:40
    +2

    Holy crap this is almost half price!
    But it's a discontinued product.
    But if you want a good PQ 16:10 monitor this is gonna be it.

    You can also get the U2311H (it's replacement) for $296.65 with the 15% coupon I saw floating around here in the forums (for some reason can't find it anymore) or whirlpool. If you factor in MoneyBackCo cashback it makes it $277.78 (it's a $18.87 cashback)

    • [Deactivated] on 12/02/2011 - 20:50

      delete

    • MetalPhreak on 14/02/2011 - 17:19

      U2311H is $298 at Harris Tech and it was $268 last month…

  • ThePistonHead on 12/02/2011 - 13:54

    No HDMI?

    • Trance N Dance on 12/02/2011 - 14:14
      +1

      This monitor was designed back in the day when 16:9 didn't ruin the monitor world, and DVI was king (and still is, HDMI is only handy if you need audio passthrough)

      • GreatWhiteHunter on 12/02/2011 - 15:36

        Umm isn't DisplayPort better than HDMI or DVI??

        • Trance N Dance on 12/02/2011 - 16:34
          -1

          Yeah but uptake is still slow
          Pre built computers are still shipping out with VGA/DVI and most monitors dont take displayport.
          Also it's only recent that monitors that take them are churning through so it'll be a year before DisplayPort take over. (ie My secondary monitor doesnt take DVI and I'm not gonna throw that out anytime soon)

          But yes, once DisplayPort gets it's foothold it will be king but for now Long Live the King (albeit the aging and dying King)

    • anthony on 13/02/2011 - 00:44

      Why?
      It is a computer monitor with no speakers and DVI is exactly the same for video as HDMI.

  • stralya on 12/02/2011 - 14:18

    Are these new / ex-demo / refurbished? The heading on the webpage says "Preconfigured New and Refurbished"

    • theguru1 on 12/02/2011 - 14:33

      Looks like it is either new or refurbised. I guess the later.

      • Dan_ on 13/02/2011 - 02:07

        No, I took up the exact same deal about half a year ago, if its refurbished, it will clearly say so.

  • Balls on 12/02/2011 - 14:42
    +1

    oh wow IPS
    nice

  • Balls on 12/02/2011 - 14:43
    +1

    ahh its 16:10

    • anthony on 13/02/2011 - 00:47

      The way monitors should be!

  • superkieu on 12/02/2011 - 14:58
    +1

    the monitor is good but not for average home user like me.

    1. price is too high for a 22" monitor nowaday. Many people expect less than $200 for a 22" monitor.
    2. No HDMI + speakerphone for a $230 monitor.
    3. This monitor uses 52Watt on average. Many 22" monitors are using around 30watt. Mine is 22" and it's using 30watt on average.
    • younggunny on 12/02/2011 - 19:12

      whoops just saw the resolution

    • anthony on 13/02/2011 - 00:48
      +3

      price is too high for a 22” monitor nowaday. Many people expect less than $200 for a 22” monitor.

      This monitor uses an IPS screen is are more expensive to make.

      IPS is much better than the cheaper TN screens which are used in cheaper screens.

  • sunbeam on 12/02/2011 - 16:38
    +2

    FWIW I bought 3 of these about a month ago. What some people do not realize is that they are 16:10 and therefore the vertical dimension, 296mm, is almost exactly the same as a 24" 16:9 monitor. They are fantastic - only really needed 2 but i knew I would eventually want another one so bought the 3rd one at the same time. I bought a soundbar for about $36 which works well. I think the price for an IPS panel is really cheap and the build quality is great. Just my 2c worth

  • AlexF on 12/02/2011 - 18:19
    -1

    I don't care about size, I care about resolution and this model is way too low..
    Get this (http://accessories.ap.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=au&l…) 1920x1080 for only a little more ($279.20)

    • anthony on 13/02/2011 - 00:47
      +2

      That monitor is a 16:9 resolution, this is 16:10

      • AlexF on 14/02/2011 - 16:46

        So? It's still lower-resolution regardless of ratio!
        I think there's a confusion between quantity and quality here - (pixel) pitch represent (display) quality, size and ratio represents quantity. Size isn't related to quality.
        Anyone for a 1024x768 in 40" - Hitachi used to make these (16:9) plasmas?

    • MHLoppy on 14/02/2011 - 16:53

      How is 1680 x 1050 way too low? The difference between that and full HD isn't very big :/

      • AlexF on 14/02/2011 - 17:21

        Let's see, 1920x1080=2073.6K pixels; 1680x1050=1764K pixels is 17.5% more pixels for 4.5% increase in diagonal for 21% increase in price.

        • MHLoppy on 14/02/2011 - 17:23

          Which still doesn't explain why you think 1680 x 1050 is "way too low"

        • CryptWizard on 15/02/2011 - 01:40

          It's not enough to fit a 1920x1080 video. Duh.

  • punter1 on 12/02/2011 - 18:26

    how do buy this monitor?
    over the phone?

    • ttkc on 12/02/2011 - 18:50

      Yeah you need to ring them.

  • QuiOui on 14/02/2011 - 10:25

    Why does the link go through s2d6.com?

  • registradus on 14/02/2011 - 10:54

    do you need to have a special account or anything to order these? looks like corporate site

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join