• expired

PowerColor RED DEVIL Radeon RX Vega 56 $745.04 (Including Delivery from USA) @ Newegg

90

PowerColor RED DEVIL Radeon RX Vega 56 DirectX 12 AXRX VEGA 56 8GBHBM2-2D2H/OC 8GB 2048-Bit HBM2 PCI Express 3.0 CrossFireX Support ATX Video Card

  • 8GB 2048-Bit HBM2
  • Core Clock 1308 MHz
  • Boost Clock 1526 MHz
  • 2 x HDMI 2 x DisplayPort
  • 3584 Stream Processors
  • PCI Express 3.0

The price above includes standard shipping.
For extra $1.96 you can get the Express.

$57.04 World EggSaver Standard (4-7 Business Days)
$59.00 World EggSaver Express (2-3 Business Days)

Take $20 AU off Your First Order of $125 or More
https://promotions.newegg.com/marketplace/2018/18-1434/Austr…

Edit: Shipping breakdown
Edit2: $20 off promotion

Related Stores

Newegg
Newegg

closed Comments

  • it says 688 AUD so 60$ shipping fee???

    • +1

      $57.04
      I've updated the post

  • +2

    so,

    1070 ti = $629

    1080 = $699

    1080 FTW = $809

    vega 56 = $745

    • +2

      One word 'Freesync'

      • +4

        I would have said "Monero"

      • -1

        I'm no fanboy but i really wanted a full amd system. but due to the price/performance of the vega at launch i went with the 1080ti ( i was going to go with the vega64). back to my point. i will mention Nvidia's fast sync on my 1440p 144hz freesync monitor works extremely well.. to the point were i can confidently say there is no need for G-sync or freesync. just my exp and 2 cents.

        • -1

          Absolutely no question the green team have the better cards. I have a freesync montior and wanted to utilize it. Having said this i have never heard about fast sync. Every days a school day

        • -1

          @jackwoz: AMD have a similar technology to Fast Sync called "Enhanced Sync" which was introduced in Radeon Software 17.7.2. It works in much the same way as Fast Sync does. I also disagree with the idea that there's no need for G-Sync or FreeSync, so just to clear up what each different "sync" technology does:

          • Vertical Sync (V-Sync): Synchronises the output of the game to the refresh rate of the display to minimise or eliminate tearing, but results in stuttering while below the refresh rate and increases latency while above the refresh rate.

          • G-Sync (NVIDIA) and FreeSync (AMD), also known as Adaptive Sync: Synchronises the refresh rate of the display to the frame rate of the game within a fixed refresh window (differs between displays), which eliminates tearing and stutter while within that window but does nothing when the frame rate exceeds it.

          • Fast Sync (NVIDIA) and Enhanced Sync (AMD): Attempts to minimise latency and stuttering when compared to V-Sync. While below the refresh rate of the display, decreases stuttering compared to V-Sync but results in occasional tearing. While above the refresh rate of the display, provides lower latency than V-Sync and also minimises tearing.

          It's also worth mentioning "Low Framerate Compensation", or LFC. LFC is a feature of adaptive sync technologies that kicks in when the frame rate of the game dips below the minimum bound of the adaptive sync window, and effectively allows the minimum adaptive sync window to reach all the way down to 1 frame per second. All G-Sync displays support LFC (from memory), but FreeSync with LFC is only supported on FreeSync monitors where the upper bound of the adaptive sync refresh window is at least twice that of the minimum bound. For example, a FreeSync display with a 60-144 Hz adaptive sync window will support LFC, while a FreeSync display with a 48-60 Hz adaptive sync window will not.

          So if you mix and match your sync technologies a bit, you can find a good mix of features. Combining FreeSync and Enhanced Sync on an LFC compatible display for example results in smooth, tear-free gameplay at any frame rate below the native refresh rate of the display where V-Sync on would result in stuttering and V-Sync off would result in tearing (e.g. playing a demanding game like The Witcher 3), while also minimising tearing and keeping latency low at any frame rate above the native refresh rate of the display where FreeSync does nothing (e.g. playing an esports/fast paced game like CS:GO).

        • @tmr3: Sigh, Fast sync/Enhanced sync do not minimise stuttering, they make it worse!

          Vertical Sync (V-Sync) comes in 3 types:

          Double buffered, has low latency but if the graphics card can not keep the frame rate at the refresh rate of the monitor it will drop the frame rate to an integer divisor of the refresh rate (e.g 60FPS, 30FPS, 20FPS, 15FPS ect.).

          First in, first out (FIFO) Triple buffering, frame rate can be anything from the refresh rate down, adds an extra frame of latency due to the extra buffer and because the frame rate can be a non integer divisor of the refresh rate some frames may have to be shown for 2 refreshes of the screen while other frames are not, thus stuttering.

          Fast sync / Enhanced sync, also has 3 buffers (one front, one back and a last rendered buffer) which allows the graphics card to render as many frames it wants to the back buffer (which then gets flipped to the last rendered buffer) and when the monitor needs a new front buffer it will flip in the last rendered buffer, cutting latency but adding uneven frame pacing (thus stutter) and it only works when the computer is rendering faster than the monitor refresh rate, else it will screen tear and add extra latency above no VSync at all (you should also not use it if you have GSync enabled).

    • +4

      Nvidia are extremely anti-consumer especially with the latest GPP fiasco from which they withdrew.

      My personal preference is paying a bit more to company who makes it code available to everyone and who's adaptive sync technology will not add $200 to the cost of the monitor because it's propriety tech.

      • +1

        I up voted your comment. However what is the point of making a technology free if you have to pay more for the card? And right now you do. I expected the Vega cards, I wanted to buy one but none of them made sense. To be honest besides the mining performance for gamers they have been a big flop. Overpriced and never in stock.

        Fine Nvidia is anti competitive, they are stupidly anti competitive because they have no competition right now. Give me a competitively priced Vega card, that is not a heater with good performance and I will buy it. This is neither of them.

        • who profit from the price jack of vega cards ?

        • +1

          AMD aren't the ones who have price jacked, it's the miners who have caused this. AMD released their cards with an RRP that was inline with the performance of the cards. It's just that we've never seen the cards for this price because of cryptomining. I have an RX 580, I thought about getting a 1060 instead but went with a card that was slightly more powerful but mostly because of company ethics.

        • +2

          Here is my personal belief:
          I want to support the underdog now, even if it's ideal and by that financially "punishing" the anti-consumer.
          As a result, in the next generation one of the following will happen:
          a. Anti-consumer company will see an impact on sales and as result change their ways.
          b. The underdog will gain a sales boot which will allow they to better compete and offer better prices

  • -1

    man this blame krypton for an inadequate supply is absolute shit…

    Prices were kept artificially high by the manufacturers.

  • Thanks OP. Don't forget to create a new account and get $AU20 off your first order. https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/381122

Login or Join to leave a comment