Ford Australia - Forced to Retrospectively Honor ACL's

TLDR version:

"The ruling means PowerShift-equipped Focus, Fiesta and EcoSport owners who asked for, but didn’t receive a refund or no-cost replacement between May 1 2015 and November 1 2016 can have their case independently reviewed – and Ford has committed to compensating affected customers based on the results of that review."

FULL ARTICLE

Ford and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) have agreed on a penalty and settlement over the long-running, widely-noted problems with PowerShift dual-clutch transmissions.

The settlement will see Ford pay a $10 million fine, and undertake the actions listed below:

Establish an independent complaints review program for customers who requested but did not receive a refund or no cost replacement vehicle between 1 May 2015 and 1 November 2016, when the Owner Loyalty Program was in operation
Commit to a customer service charter and making information more easily accessible for customers, including about their rights under consumer law
Upgrade and independently review its Consumer Law Compliance Program and Complaints Handling System
Improve consumer law compliance training for employees, dealers and customer service staff.
For a full breakdown of the PowerShift saga, check out Alborz Fallah’s article from June 2017.

“As we said from the outset of this action – we took too long to identify the issues and we acknowledge that PowerShift customers did not have complaints handled appropriately between May 2015 and February 2016,” said Graeme Whickman, president and CEO of Ford Australia said today.

“We were overwhelmed with the volume of complaints and, while it was not intended, over a ten-month period our processes were inadequate and information provided was either inaccurate or incomplete. We let our customers down and for that we are sorry.

“This process has identified the challenges our customers faced and the lack of appropriate processes to effectively handle these,” he continued.

“Of particular concern was the Owner Loyalty Program, which resulted in customers paying an additional cost to buy new vehicles although they may have been eligible for a refund or no cost replacement vehicle.

“We now realise this program was flawed as it didn’t ensure an adequate assessment of customers’ rights under consumer law. It was discontinued in November 2016.

“We are committed to making right with these customers.”

The ruling means PowerShift-equipped Focus, Fiesta and EcoSport owners who asked for, but didn’t receive a refund or no-cost replacement between May 1 2015 and November 1 2016 can have their case independently reviewed – and Ford has committed to compensating affected customers based on the results of that review.

That process starts in July this year, and will run for 12 months.

According to Ford, around 75,000 vehicles were sold with PowerShift transmissions in Australia. There were 10,500 complaints about the transmissions lodged between May 1 2015 and February 2016.

The company accepted 1600 vehicles as trade-ins, and took further payment from those customers for a new car, while a further 180 customers were offered employee pricing on a new car.

A class action lawsuit was filed against Ford in May 2016, alleging the transmission “slips, bucks, jerks, and harshly engages when driven”. In July of 2017, the company strongly refuted the idea it mis-handled customer complaints, before the ACCC announced its plans to sue.

Original Article

Related Stores

Ford Australia
Ford Australia

Comments

  • When I bought a ford 10 years ago from Alto Ford in Artarmon they where very quick to take my deposit. As the car was financed they needed to refund this once the fiance went through. It took them 3 months plus many phone calls before I saw my deposit returned.

    When I had an issue and took the car to them they offered to replace the item and send the broken item away for review, and if the review decided it wasn't a warranty claim then I would need to pay for the new item. Yeah right. I told them if the review found it wasn't covered by warranty then they should put the broken item back onto my car. 10 years later and I am still bitter over the way I was treated. Let this be a lesson in Customer service.

    • Stealerships love to limit their liability.
      Stealerships are in for a shake up in coming years with EVs becoming more mainstream.
      In todays competitive market, the real money is made from the service department.
      A large portion of the service departments business revolves around servicing and repairing internal combustion engines.

      • +1

        and replacing windscreen wipers at $180 a go!

      • They like to upsell the need for servicing. I have a KIA with a factory recommended 12 month service interval. The dealer, part of the AHG group, has been texting me to bring it in at 6 months. I am ignoring those suggestions. My car is 8 months old and hasn't yet reached 5000km.

        • +1

          Let them know you wish to Opt out of their marketing.
          Third party companies exist now that specialise in calling all clients who have previously had their vehicle services at said dealership.
          They are paid a commision for every client they get back through the dealerships doors.
          They can be really pushy and make claims such as your warranty will be void etc to effectively line their pockets.

        • @Cheap Charlie:
          Charlie, I'm not going to bother opting out. They can waste their efforts. When they first did it I checked the KIA web site and the service book to confirm the interval. The texts are actually coming from the AHG group Vic HQ. I see they only run two KIA dealers in Vic, Mornington and Frankston. http://www.ahg.com.au/vic

          What it may affect is the 3 year extended warranty that they gave me for free to take the warranty out to 10 years. Its value is about the same amount as I didn't pay for it.

        • @BobD:

          the 3 year extended warranty that they gave me for free

          You mean the 1o years of guaranteed servicing exclusively with them document.
          Usually not worth the paper they are written on.
          Do you intend to keep the car for 10 years?
          If not, its not uncommon for such policies to be non-transferable.

        • @Cheap Charlie: When I got the car I read all of the Ts & Cs of all the warranties both factory and extended and the extended one is not worth the paper it's written on. As I said earlier, it was offered free and that's about its worth to me. It is also non transferable.

          In the last 30 years I haven't kept a car longer than 5 years.

Login or Join to leave a comment