This was posted 6 years 8 months 24 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

BlitzWolf AmpCore Turbo BW-TC10 3A Braided 6ft/1.8m USB 3.0 to Type-C Cable - US$5.99 (~AU$7.98) Shipped @ BangGood

610
BlitzWolf AmpCore Turbo BW-TC10 3A Braided 6ft/1.8m USB 3.0 to Type-C Cable - US$5.99 (~AU$7.98) Shipped @ BangGoodAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
spackbace on 02/04/2018 - 18:40 banggood.com (2163 clicks)
Last edited 02/04/2018 - 18:40
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Choose China warehouse for discounted price. Just missed out on US$4.99 shipped unfortunately.

AmpCore Turbo Cords are USB3.0

Note: This is a pre-order: Processing time:Expected on April 20, 2018

Specification:
Brand: BlitzWolf®
Model: BW-TC10
Material: Protective Tinned Copper Mesh + Aluminum Foil Shielding + Environmental Flexible Braided Jacket
Plug: Standard USB3.0 A Male to USB Type-C Male, Gold-plated Reversible Connector Head
Wire Core: 32 AWG(Data)*3 + 22 AWG(Power)
Output: 3.6-12V, up to 3A
Data Sync Speed: Up to 5Gbps (USB3.1 Gen1)
Length: 1.8m/6ft
OD: 4.0mm
Color: Red Cable & Black Metal Plug

Referral Links

Referral: random (27)

Referee gets $2 in coupons. Referrer gets 10% off (if referee spends over US$10)

Electrical & Electronics BlitzWolf USB Cable USB Type-C Cable

Related Stores

Banggood
Banggood

closed Comments

  • garage sale on 02/04/2018 - 18:44
    +6

    a

    garage sale on 02/04/2018 - 18:44 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
  • raj76 on 02/04/2018 - 20:03
    +1

    Any deals on micro usb cable

  • countmein on 02/04/2018 - 20:10
    +2

    Been waiting for this and giving up. Bought tronsmart instead from the last deal. This one' good deal

    • ethan961 on 02/04/2018 - 21:36

      My Tronsmart USB C braided ones from that last deal arrived recently, obviously too early to speak about longevity but they seem as well built as other Blitzwolf braided micro USB cables I've used, which is very good. I know some people hated the basic Tronsmart micro USB cables (though they've been very good for me over the last year), but the braided Tronsmart ones are much better than those were. One big difference is these being USB 3 and the Tronsmart only USB 2, for the people that matters to.

      • Clear on 02/04/2018 - 21:42

        I know some people hated the basic Tronsmart micro USB cables (though they've been very good for me over the last year)

        I've been writing up the marketing material for the next gen recently :P Next gen are much better :)

        • spackbace on 02/04/2018 - 22:15
          +1

          Marketing blurb:
          Gen1 was shit, we know that, but we listened and put some effort in and these will actually last the distance!

        • Clear on 02/04/2018 - 22:17
          +1

          @Spackbace: That's kinda what I said! Unfortunately I don't sign off on the material.

  • D6C1 on 02/04/2018 - 20:34

    I bought one last time. So tight to push in. I don't use I anymore so I don't loosen and break the charging port on the phone.

    • mec on 02/04/2018 - 20:37

      I bought 2 a few deals ago? I noticed that one came warped and oversized while the other seemed fine. I have a small sample size but the quality of these cables are 50/50 for me

      • D6C1 on 02/04/2018 - 20:38

        Yeah not worth the price tag

  • McFly on 02/04/2018 - 20:48
    -1

    Why does everyone keep quoting 3A for USB A cables when the maximum is 2.4A???

    • Clear on 02/04/2018 - 21:28
      +2

      That's not entirely true. Type-C has a maximum of 5 Amps which Huawei SuperCharge and Oppo VOOC take advantage of. While Oneplus' Dash Charge goes up to 4 amps.

      The trick is to find cables that follow the correct specification as there are several versions/revisions.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Power

      • garage sale on 02/04/2018 - 21:38
        +4

        Cables

        USB-C 3.1 cables are considered full-featured USB-C cables. They are electronically marked cables that contain a chip with an ID function based on the configuration channel and vendor-defined messages (VDM) from the USB Power Delivery 2.0 specification. Cable length should be ≤ 2 m for gen. 1 or ≤ 1 m for gen. 2.[14] Electronic ID chip provides information about product/vendor, cable connectors, USB signalling protocol (2.0, gen. 1, gen. 2), passive/active construction, use of VCONN power, available VBUS current, latency, RX/TX directionality, SOP controller mode, and hardware/firmware version .[5]

        USB-C 2.0 cables do not have shielded SuperSpeed pairs, sideband use pins, or additional wires for power lines. Increased cable lengths up to 4 m are possible.

        All USB-C cables must be able to carry a minimum of 3 A current (up to 60 W @20V) but can also carry high-power 5 A current (up to 100 W).[citation needed] All USB-C to USB-C cables must contain e-marker chips programmed to identify the cable and its current capabilities. USB Charging ports should also be clearly marked with capable power wattage.[13]

        Full-featured USB-C cables that implement USB 3.1 gen. 2 can handle up to 10 Gbit/s data rate at full duplex. They are marked with a SuperSpeed+ (SuperSpeed 10 Gbit/s) logo. There are also cables which can carry only USB 2.0 with up to 480 Mbit/s data rate. There are USB-IF certification programs available for USB-C products and end users are recommended to use USB-IF certified cables.[15]

    • Droz on 02/04/2018 - 23:00
      +1

      USB-A is the connector type, nothing to do with the amount of Amperage the cable can carry (i.e.. doesn't make it USB 1, 2 or 3)

    • McFly on 03/04/2018 - 01:22
      -1

      Is anything any of you have said applicable to this (or any standard USB A to whatever) cable?

      • garage sale on 03/04/2018 - 04:51
        +1

        are people chasing speed or power for charging ?

        if it’s power for charging, the usb 3 port on PCs and laptops (a end) has defined limits in what it delivers. i haven’t seen a PC with QC 3 port probabaly as QC is qualcomm technology, needs to be licensed, and intel isn’t going to add to their chip set and pay qualcomm, or PC manufactuers would need to add the chips and sell,it a set value add …… the intel usb 3 and 3.1 on their chip set works to a spec for speed and power if you need speed for data transfer.

        if you want higher power, then you need dedicated charger with QC3, it needs to have qualcomm licensed technology and now you want thicker cables….. but speed isn’t an issue as you don’t transfer data to a charger ……

        qualcomm licensing is why lots of chargers have 1 QC3 port and 4 IQ (5v) ports , it’s cheaper to make than 5 QC3 ports.

        so you might see some cables with higher specs to handle higher power for charging eg usb 3.1 rather than just usb 3 not for speed, for power.

        • McFly on 03/04/2018 - 08:56
          -2

          Relevance?

    • garage sale on 03/04/2018 - 05:18
      +1

      because some people plug the cable into QC 3 chargers and can get 3 amps when charging, or they have high current ports on their PCs.
      2.4 amp limit would be if you have a charger with IQ ports which limit to 2.4 amps and 5v …. so 12 watts.

      USB-C can handle over 30 watts as it’s higer voltage and current. Also need the USB-A end to be able to deliver the voltage and current with these cables (PC or charger).

      over time it will be USB-C to USB-C as people get new chargers and PCs and power banks.

      • McFly on 03/04/2018 - 09:52
        -1

        OK, so it's relevant for QC users - that makes sense.

  • clangas on 03/04/2018 - 23:18

    Anyone know of any deals on lighting cables?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join