This was posted 6 years 11 months 23 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-Ray Player $759.20 Delivered @ Klapp Audio Visual

450
Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-Ray Player $759.20 Delivered @ Klapp Audio Visual
Go to Deal
wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 08:49 klappav.com.au (1751 clicks)
Last edited 13/07/2019 - 16:19 by 2 other users

Short of the next Oppo model up (UDP-205), this is widely regarded as one of the best 4k Bluray players (this or the Panasonic DMP-UB900 is close and has been a lot cheaper at times). The 205 has better audio stuff, but I believe the visual side of it is the same. The 203 is normally sells for about $200 more - in the $950 region. Great player for the three 4k discs around :-)

Most likely part of Klapp's Boxing Day sale so ends soon.

https://www.whathifi.com/oppo/udp-203/review
https://www.whathifi.com/panasonic/dmp-ub900/review

If you want a multi region doo dah, get it here (pay in Euro for the best price) @$98
This allows you to watch disks purchased from overseas.
http://www.bluraychip.dk

Electrical & Electronics Blu-Ray Player Oppo

Related Stores

Klapp Audio Visual
Klapp Audio Visual

closed Comments

  • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:08

    205 is double the price of the 203.
    https://klappav.com.au/collections/oppo/products/udp-205-4k-…

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:38
      +1

      If you're referring to the 'normally $200 more' remark, I was meaning the normal price of the 203. Fixed now.

  • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:09

    I think you’ve mixed up your write up between the 203 and 205.

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:38

      No. I refer to both. Get the 205 if you want ultimate audio playing as well, the 203 if you're wanting the best video (and still very decent audio).

      • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:53

        “The 205 has better audio stuff, but I believe the visual side of it is the same. The 203 is normally sells about $200 more.“

        This is the confusing part. You were comparing $200 more to what? :)

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:54
          +2

          Ha ha. Righto. $200 more than the price in the title :-) Fixed.

        • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:59
          +1

          @wfdTamar: thanks OP!

    • chrism238 on 31/12/2017 - 09:16
      +31

      Sorry, but describing Oppo as a no-name brand is showing your ignorance of the home theatre market.

    • carterljohn on 31/12/2017 - 09:17
      +2

      Oppo a no-name brand in Blu ray players!!!!!!

    • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:17

      The Oppo 203 has a pretty good DAC that eventually creates a better translation of the picture quality and sound from the discs.

      I’ve compared the picture quality and sound between my Xbox One X and the Oppo 203. Oooo wins in delivering a richer HDR, clarity and also much better sound quality.

      Google this player’s review, there’re plenty out there.

      • sane on 31/12/2017 - 12:53
        +3

        The Oppo 203 has a pretty good DAC that eventually creates a better translation of the picture quality and sound from the discs.

        The picture gets sent to the TV as digital data, and so does the sound to the AV amp (if you have any sense).

        It's monster cables all over again.

        4K and UHD doesn't really stand a chance till the price gets much closer to $100 (and the disks ~$1-2 extra).

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 13:06
          -7

          I was going to write a proper response to that, but I can't be bothered explaining different qualities and levels of digital. Where's that moron button?

        • This Guy on 31/12/2017 - 17:51
          +2

          @wfdTamar:

          The different levels of digital audio are supported by audio codecs, not DAC's.

          A Digital to Analogue Converter (DAC) is not used when you use a HDMI cable. The signal stays digital.

          The AK4456 DAC used by the 203 looks nice. It may support 768kHz/32bit audio but bluray only supports 192kHz/24bit. Even so the analogue output is via RCA cables which then goes to your receiver, both steps adding noise. If the AK4456 was feed to an on board amplifier, not a pre-amp, and the SNR was still 115dB this set up would be interesting (due to the nice SNR). As it the AK4456 is in a bluray player it has no digital source capable of providing it with 768kHz/32bit digital audio.

          Bluray audio at 192kHz/24bit is to allow it to be modified digitally (processed) at the receiver without introducing errors. Human hearing cuts out around 24kHz, requiring a sample rate of just 48kHz/16bit to make sure no errors are introduced.

          tl;dr: Bluray plays decrypt digital signals and send them unmodified to the receiver and tv (ignoring UI).

        • Shonky on 31/12/2017 - 17:54

          @wfdTamar:
          What are the different qualities and the different levels of digital?

        • This Guy on 31/12/2017 - 19:08

          @Shonky:

          I will help:

          Bluray different levels of digital audio.

        • Shonky on 31/12/2017 - 19:29

          @This Guy:
          Yes I'm aware of higher sampling rates and more bits per sample. And yes, to a point more is better there.

          My question was in response to his reply to someone stating digital was digital which in turn in was response to the nonsense about having a better DAC.

        • sane on 31/12/2017 - 21:45
          +1

          @Shonky:

          Yeah, the point is it might have a wonderful DAC, but basically you shouldn't really be using it since everything should be staying digital till later in the audio and video paths.

          Even if you were to use the player DACs to output analogue audio to the amp, you'd be limited by the SNR of that stage. Rule of thumb is to keep it digital till as late as possible.

          Save the money, put the DAC in the amp (or even the speakers) and leave the player to be digital and play with codecs. Which is also why the players need to be cheaper, since they are only playing with digital data (which either works or doesn't).

          You CAN stuff up the codecs, but that's just software, which can be fixed via a firmware update.

    • [Deactivated] on 31/12/2017 - 09:18
      +1

      Yes. You are missing something. It is definitely not a no-name brand in this area. Read the review provided by the OP. If you have a great TV, surely you would think about the rest of your signal chain.

    • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:19
      +4

      But if you’re watching your 4K movies through your Aldi 4K TV, then the $200 player is doing a good job.

    • BradH13 on 31/12/2017 - 09:28
      -1

      Hahah. Some people's ignorance is unreal.

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:52

      Hey I get the same remarks when I post about expensive video processors. Some people can't see the point. They get audio processors and will spend thousands on them and speakers, but not a single box that improves the picture.

      • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 09:59

        Lumagen Radiance Pro or MadVR on a HTPC?

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:10

          Once posted a DVDO iScan Duo I think, or maybe it was a Lumagen. I dare not mention the current deal at curtpalme.com for Lumagen.

      • This Guy on 31/12/2017 - 18:02

        Expensive video processors on a player are a waste of money as they will not be calibrated to your tv.

        You want an expensive video processor on your tv and an unmodified digital stream from your player. Anything else is just adding noise to your set up.

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 20:15

          That’s why I get a calibrator and software that’s easy - ChromaPure.

  • EightImmortals on 31/12/2017 - 09:13
    +1

    My BDP-83 is still going strong……:)

    • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:23

      Nice! These things are pretty durable. The 205 would be an overkill for most people but it’s like having the Darbee edition :)

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:56
      +1

      I have a multi region 93 Bluray I don't think I've even watched a whole movie on!

  • medium_tight on 31/12/2017 - 09:20
    +2

    With band 28 ?

    • Ragnarok1983 on 31/12/2017 - 09:58
      +3

      Yeap latest Oneplus (OPPO) all have band 28

      • Shonky on 31/12/2017 - 13:24
        -2

        Oneplus is not OPPO

        • presentv on 31/12/2017 - 13:42
          +2

          Oppo, vivo and oneplus are basically the same company.

        • Ragnarok1983 on 31/12/2017 - 15:29

          All subsidiaries of BBK Electronics. OnePlus is just a sub-brand specifically targeted towards overseas market.

          Besides heaps of the components on Oneplus are shared with OPPO, Dash charge for starters.

  • sergun on 31/12/2017 - 09:25
    +5

    Just got Panasonic UB 300 for $197 from HN. Plays 4K discs perfectly on C7 via a $2 HDMI cable; no Dolby Vision support, as in Oppo, but there are no DV blurays discs either; So the question is what benefit does it give today in comparison with a sub-$200 HDR 4k player?

    • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:34

      It’s all about the 32 bit DAC chipset in the Oppo players. Just Google it and you’ll find plenty of answers.

      The debate is almost like comparing a Soniq TV with something like Samsung/Sony. If you’re not too particular with the picture or sound, then the UB 300 is a pretty good investment.

      • Shonky on 31/12/2017 - 13:25
        +9

        What is the DAC used for in what should be an all digital signal path?

        • Charity on 02/01/2018 - 23:55

          It's NOT all digital. Not for sound. By definition, what comes out of the DAC isn't digital. What goes into your speakers isn't digital.

          The idea is this DAC is better than your TV's or amp's DAC.

      • This Guy on 31/12/2017 - 18:08
        +1

        Bluray only supports codecs up to 24bit and as Shonky said, a Digital to Analogue Converter (DAC) is not used in a digital path.

      • Raynes on 31/12/2017 - 10:32
        +10

        They're not claiming to know what they're talking about, hence why they're asking what the benefits are …

    • blackjacknz on 31/12/2017 - 10:29
      +1

      I went from an old Oppo BDP93 (had it for about 5 years) to a Samsung K8500 to play 4K movies. Disks were fine, but streaming from a network drive i had issues with the audio. I had also just upgraded my amp to a Pioneer VsX1131 (thanks to Ozbargain!) and added some ceiling speakers for Dolby Atmos.

      The Samsung player lasted all of 2 months before i sold it and brought this Oppo 203 ($885)….no issues with any file playback.

      Anyone who asks for recommendations for a player…its Oppo all the way.

    • ode1online on 31/12/2017 - 17:55

      Despicable me 3 was heralded as the first Dolby Vison 4k disc that came out mid this year, however not seen any other titles..

      http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Despicable-Me-3-4K-Blu-ray/181…

  • carlscott1982 on 31/12/2017 - 09:29

    Love my Oppo player. Got the chipped version and now I can play 4K and multiregion bluray and DVD all on one device. As OP said, you probably don't need the model up as its all audio related for twice the price.

    • F1Maniac on 31/12/2017 - 09:32

      Guessing this doesn't support atmos or dtsx passthrough?

      • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:36
        +2

        Most definitely. Its running fine with Atmos or DTS-X with my setup.

        • carlscott1982 on 02/01/2018 - 11:52

          Do you find DTS-X is a bit of a disappointment? I use that as I don't really want to buy extra kit for Atmos, but I don't really hear a difference over DTS-HD etc.
          Atmos in the cinema is fantastic.

  • aggregate on 31/12/2017 - 09:43
    +8

    Reminds me of the time a VCR player costs almost $1000, or a $1000 DVD player. Doesn’t matter how good it is now, something better and cheaper will come out in the near future.

    • Ulysses31 on 31/12/2017 - 22:04
      -1

      This.

      $759?!!!

      Almost makes me sick. But, to each their own, i spose.

  • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:43
    -1

    Question is why get one of these even over a Bluray as there are so few decent movies in 4k? Really, for me it so I can see something in proper 4k (rather than streamed, if that even works for me) on my spanking new TV. Otherwise a Bluray player and the TV's upscaling would suit most people.

    One of the better 4k's $23.98 (about $1.70 delivery if you can't Click & Collect)
    Planet Earth II
    https://www.jbhifi.com.au/movies-tv-shows/movies-tv-shows-on…

    • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:48
      +1

      Looks like you haven’t seen the 4K shelf lately at JB. Most new releases are already in 4K.

      The remastered Blade Runner in 4K was a major surprise. The ATMOS in the movie surpassed any new movies to date.

      4K movies also come with HDR, the new spectrum of colours are pretty amazing.

      • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 09:59

        Just looked at their site and bought two - Planet Earth II and Intersteller. There's not much (what I'd be interested in) online. I'll have a look in store. I hate buying disks though so only really want a few jaw droppers.

        • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 10:01

          Make sure you use the STACK 20% off and combine it with the current 20% off blu rays DVD right now.

          It’s almost a 35% off the ticket price :)

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:12

          Oh sod. Oh well only got 2.

    • chrism238 on 31/12/2017 - 09:49

      Sure, for the 'most people' satisfied with upscaled Blurays, this item is over-the-top.
      But there's many people around that appreciate better picture and audio quality than Blurays can deliver: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=2686567

      Agreed, there's only around 300 4K disks currently available, but their time will come (and long before everyone has a fast enough NBN to stream 4K).

      • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 09:55

        Netflix has been streaming compressed 4K content for a while now. Not the best but it delivers the pixels non the less :)

        • chrism238 on 31/12/2017 - 10:08
          +3

          Yes, but being compressed, it delivers neither all nor the correct pixels :-)

        • AlbyDuck on 31/12/2017 - 11:44
          +3

          @chrism238: Are you saying that Bluray discs store movies in an uncompressed format? Cause I'd be really surprised if they do.

        • chrism238 on 31/12/2017 - 12:00

          @AlbyDuck:

          Unsure how you made that inference; I was was speaking of Netflix's need to compress 4K streams even moreso than on 4K disks.

        • AlbyDuck on 31/12/2017 - 13:03
          +2

          @chrism238: By pointing out that Netflix streams were compressed I thought you might be implying that the alternatives were not. Glad we cleared that up.

      • Captain Howdy on 31/12/2017 - 11:10
        +2

        I honestly don't know about 4K discs becoming a thing. I mean, look at Blu ray - walk in any store, specialist or otherwise, and DVDs will outnumber BD by an order of magnitude. Physical media is dying unfortunately. Streaming is growing, but as people rightly point out, its gimped compared to discs.

        • xenoic on 31/12/2017 - 11:52
          +1

          Streaming works for the majority of the people but not for those who's looking for the best picture quality and sound.

          It's like comparing photo taken on your mobile and photo taken from a proper DSLR. Just choose whichever that you like.

          BTW, DVDs???? I just gave away a box of 500+ discs to a friend. lol

  • lollyball on 31/12/2017 - 09:51
    +1

    apparantly panasonic much better than oppo, just saying
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ys6mpdhaZI

    • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 09:55

      Agreed. Kicking myself for not getting a Panasonic 900 when they were around the $400 mark. Now holding off to CES in a few weeks time.

    • blackjacknz on 31/12/2017 - 10:34
      +2

      and yet the same reviewer now uses the 203 …"3 Reasons We Use OPPO 203 for TV Reviews + Pro Tips & Tricks"
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pElmvajIkrw&t=15s

      • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 11:26

        That maybe, but the up-scaling on the Panasonic 900 is better and the HDR Slider on the UB900 more beneficial according to posts over on AVS.

        Even Vincent lists the reasons he uses the Oppo 203 over the Panny as DV support and can force HDR10 output from a DV title, the Oppo offers a Playback loop, source direct function.

        So doesn't negate his first review, just expands why us he uses it as it has more useful functions for when he is doing his reviews. Both are good players you just choose your preferences.

        • vneat on 31/12/2017 - 12:32

          Saw that you tube video review and Panasonic 900 UHD video were better than Oppo but then it lacks dolby vision. Netflix 4k already have some series or movies in dolby vision. I hope if panasonic had it too :(

        • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 13:00
          +1

          @vneat:

          Then it's a moot point as the Oppo 203 has no Apps in which to stream Netflix in Dolby vision from.

        • vneat on 31/12/2017 - 19:29

          @Spizz: Yes true. That is major setback. I was wondering if LG is a better deal or not :|

    • reactor-au on 31/12/2017 - 18:30

      The Panasonic player with a Panasonic OLED panel would be my choice, they really have amazing processing compared even to the Sony OLEDs.

    • Sage on 31/12/2017 - 10:46

      Doesn't mean there will be a new type of Blu Ray disc to support the resolution.

      • gasman70 on 31/12/2017 - 11:16

        Of course not. I am merely highlighting the ridiculousness of it all.

  • Captain Howdy on 31/12/2017 - 09:52

    Oppo are the best when it comes to home theatre stuff. Still rocking a DV-983H for my DVD upscaling duties. Can't find a good reason not to stop using it yet.

  • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 09:53
    +1

    Tempting deal if you want the best player with DV support. How much extra to get it chipped?

    Let me preface this by saying I currently own the Opp 103 which is a brilliant player. Personally however I'm waiting to CES in early January to see if Panasonic release a follow up to their flagship Panasonic DMP-UB900 which I believe is a better player with better up scaling abilities in comparison to the 203, offers some streaming apps which the Oppo 203 is missing, and hope Panasonic add DV support in their new flagship model.

    Check Vincent Teoh's Youtube comparison between the Oppo 203 and Panny 900. YMMV.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ys6mpdhaZI

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:14

      $98 - I did say in the main post.

      • MuscleRulz on 31/12/2017 - 10:20

        Hang on… On that site it's $98 USD + Postage!!
        Much better off and cheaper getting the mod from Gatti Audio in Victoria (also has eBay shop with Free postage) which includes a 12 month warranty.

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:26

          It's US$89 and it's posted free. Pay in Euro. It has the best conversion rate (according to the calculator on my Mac). Shipping is free. Cost Euro 64 - A$97.83 on my credit card (28 Degrees, no international conversion fees). It's the same thing as the $130 Gatti one.

        • MuscleRulz on 31/12/2017 - 10:41

          @wfdTamar:

          Yes it's the same mod. However, it comes with no warranty and all the way from Denmark!! Better off buying from Gatti (local Victorian) when eBay have their discounts, get a warranty and if any issues, it's only got to go back to Melbourne not Denmark… It's a No brainer.

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:50
          +1

          I would presume it has a warranty. It is a very simple little bit of electronics, but yes get it off ebay when they have a 20% off day.

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:22

      Vincent Teoh knows his stuff. Maybe I should have got the Panasonic, particularly as I have a Panasonic OLED coming. Also has been significantly cheaper than the Oppo at times.

    • blackjacknz on 31/12/2017 - 10:46

      and yet the same reviewer now uses the 203 …"3 Reasons We Use OPPO 203 for TV Reviews + Pro Tips & Tricks"
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pElmvajIkrw&t=15s

  • MuscleRulz on 31/12/2017 - 10:09
    +2

    What HiFi Review Oppo 203 vs Pana 900: https://www.whathifi.com/features/oppo-udp-203-vs-panasonic-…

    "The Oppo is DEMONSTRABLY better than the Panasonic. Startling clarity and resolution, gorgeous colours and a strong contrast that means we can’t tear our eyes away from the picture on screen. It makes a glorious sound, too.
    It’s been a tough fight, but ultimately, the Oppo UDP-203 is the 4K Blu-ray player we’d take home, pop in a 4K film and let ourselves be immersed in the magic of movies.

    • blackjacknz on 31/12/2017 - 10:35

      have you actually owned one before?

    • Raynes on 31/12/2017 - 10:47
      -2

      Could you repeat the question?

    • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 10:56
      +1

      US company - Silicon Valley. Possibly Chinese manufactured. What isn't today?

      https://www.oppodigital.com/About.aspx

      Now if you're talking about their phones vs the big name companies you have a slightly better argument, however having owned 3 Samsung Galaxy Notes and bought an Oppo phone for someone I wouldn't turn my nose up at one of them either.

      Can we have a moron button on here please?

    • carterljohn on 31/12/2017 - 11:57

      LOL,not the same company, one is US the other Chinese……………

      • Blackrose on 31/12/2017 - 12:21

        BBK Electronics is the parent company
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBK_Electronics

        BBK is also an OEM suplier to other companies.

        • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 13:01
          +1

          It is pretty confusing. According to Wikipedia the Bluray company (Oppo Digital) is Chinese, based in California!

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppo_Digital

          So it's like GM owning Holden (to use a defunct analogy). Did that make Holden American, or Australian?

          The phones (Oppo Electronics) company is all Chinese.

          So under it all, it is the same company.

    • presentv on 31/12/2017 - 13:46

      In fact, Japan is the country which pays the most to the public relation. Sadly you don't know that.

      • wfdTamar on 31/12/2017 - 14:05

        Er, right. Ok then. Nothing I like to see more than a well made, easily decipherable point.

  • Regie69 on 31/12/2017 - 10:49
    +2

    Better off with an Xbox One S/X

    • kml22 on 31/12/2017 - 11:04
      +1

      Yes, I got XB one S instead.

      • Spizz on 31/12/2017 - 11:10
        +1

        Not from a usability stand point, and that applies to the Xbox One S/X vs any standalone player. YMMV.

    • fatpizza on 31/12/2017 - 11:34
      +3

      Sure, if you just want to have a basic 4K player.
      If however, you are the sort of person who wants to get the absolute best out of their 4K setup, then the Oppo is an obvious choice.

      • pasey25 on 31/12/2017 - 11:40
        +1

        I have an Xbox one s feeding a jvc x7000 projector via denon x4400 pass through. Are you saying that the oppo will generate a better picture (or audio)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join