Ryzen 5 1600x shipped by Newegg from $284.35
P.S - No stock cooler included
Ryzen 5 1600x shipped by Newegg from $284.35
P.S - No stock cooler included
But socket capability for an upgrade is close to none.
What are you talking about plenty of used motherboards to pickup, and who needs ddr4 memory, that difference is minimal.
The benchmarks disagree, and I'm an intel owner
Plenty of benchamrk results here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rZscAgG4Ec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLWs5B3RoQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isotqDDGa1A
I am an x5650 owner myself, and even with my horrible gpu I can run most games on ultra 60fps, showing the power of the cpu, no offence but even the i5 2500 has nearly the same game performance as ryzen 5.
What benchmarks are you talking about, video encoding, yeah not talking about video encoding, talking about real world gaming performance.
An opinion is easy to hold, but can you present some facts which support this opinion?
Plenty of benchamrk results here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rZscAgG4Ec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLWs5B3RoQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isotqDDGa1A
I am an x5650 owner myself, and even with my horrible gpu I can run most games on ultra 60fps, showing the power of the cpu, no offence but even the i5 2500 has nearly the same game performance as ryzen 5.
I think im going to call That test bullshit
https://imgur.com/a/1LHg9
^shots on both times on both videos.
Ryzen 1600 vs I5 6600k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JypkqwpOtNI&t=213s
Time: 3:54
(the video you linked)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLWs5B3RoQ
Time: 2:01
Both videos used GTX 1060
Im calling bullshit to the fact that according to the video you linked the Xeon beats the I5 6600k while the Xeon single core performance and multicore is far below that of the I5 6600k
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=3000&cmp[]=1304
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Xeon-X5650-vs-AMD…
lolno
Those videos all show the Ryzen 1600 not the 1600x.
@Axelstrife: The difference is minimal, plus an overclocked xeon is uncomparable.
@SimpleRoger
I'll definitely buy a second hand 1366 board in 2017. Great idea.
Ryzen, Coffee Lake…. Pffft who needs new stuff hey.
@scuderiarmani: $200 dollars for a mobo and cpu combo, with better power comsumption and better frames in some games, and at worst only 2 frames lower, sure i guess, why not.
That's a good deal but it's hard to justify paying money for 1600X over 1600 or 1700. Ryzen 5 1600 with stock cooler you can OC it to 3.7GHz without worrying about temperature at all. If you plan to buy Ryzen 5 1600x + cooler it's better to spend money on 1700 which has stock cooler and can OC too.
yeah but no RGB on the stock cooler, everyone knows LEDs means more FPS.
Any Core 2 duo with RGB can play PUBG ultra settings :)
Personally I'd consider this if i was going to put a passive (or semi passive) cooler on it for a silent pc. Otherwise yeah, your reasoning is pretty solid!
Even then, you can buy 1600, use the save to buy a better passive cooler with LEDs (you can even sell the Stock cooler for $30 to add to that), OC it to whatever the 1600x can get to.
This 1600X is currently cheaper than any 1600 I've been able to find in Aus (they tend to be $275), and as the 1600's stock cooler is too tall for my case (SFF ftw), I'd need to buy another anyhow.
That said, I'm going to wait until the black friday (anyone remember if we get any good fallout from that?) and Christmas/Boxing Day/New Years sales.
Shame the 1700 isnt on sale, I'd get one.
Don't get a xeon x5650
Plenty of benchamrk results here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rZscAgG4Ec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLWs5B3RoQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isotqDDGa1A
I am an x5650 owner myself, and even with my horrible gpu I can run most games on ultra 60fps, showing the power of the cpu, no offence but even the i5 2500 has nearly the same game performance as ryzen 5.
Don't get a xeon x5650
Punctuation can be a bitch.
How on earth you confused Ryzen 1700 for a Xeon x5650 in my post, I don't even know.
He looks salty by the amount of down votes he received.
I wanted to get 1700 too but ended up getting 1600 for $260. I got it delivered today
Ryzen and Intel owner here - I have several systems, but one is a 1700X (OC to 3.8 GHz) and one is a 6700K.
Although the 1700X is my main system, I would honestly say be careful to anyone thinking about buying into the Ryzen platform at this stage. I bought into Ryzen a few weeks after it was launched and I had all sorts of teething issues, including poor performance, finicky RAM support, long POST times and BSODs every now and then.
My first motherboard (an MSI X370 SLI Plus) was a real dud and would be really unstable, even when the processor was at stock. I RMA'd the board and had the same issues before just giving up and purchasing a new board (the ASUS X370 Pro), which so far has given me far less grief.
Regarding the performance, it's good if you need many cores, and that is a really big if. I bought into the platform because I thought it'd give me faster numerical calculations in MATLAB (a software I usually use), but the performance is hardly better than on the 6700K (it's not as multi-threaded as I thought) and in most other applications (e.g. games), the 6700K has Ryzen beat.
Now that said, I really think this is a great value deal - at $285, it's quite a fair bit cheaper than the i5 7600K, but be weary of its weaknesses and be aware that the new 8600K with 6 cores is right around the corner which will have far better OC performance, and single threaded performance (admittedly for more $$$), but the new 8350K might be interesting - 4 cores, you can OC the hell out of it and it'll be cheaper than the current 7600K, so maybe around this price. Hopefully I've been fair!
unless you have the multi-core support feature turned on (need to pay extra), matlab generally uses only single core…
On the other hand you can instantiate many instances of matlab and they all generally sit in a separate core (which is nice).