I'm wondering if anyone has been in this situation before. Is there a 'catch' here that I am not aware of?
I bought some items from a website. The items were not as advertised. I contacted them for a refund and was refused.
I contacted my credit card company and asked them if I could dispute the transaction for a chargeback. They had me fill in a form and send them evidence. A month later, they tell me to contact the original merchant about returning the items to them. (I'm assuming it's so someone can't game the system by keeping the items and getting the chargeback).
I contact the merchant again, and now they've changed their tune. They tell me they are treating this as a 'matter of priority', and said that I need to cancel the chargeback request so they can 'look after this refund' directly with me.
I'm just remembering something similar that used to happen with paypal disputes - people would get convinced by the seller to close the dispute ("just close the dispute and then I will refund you"), but it was a trick because once you closed your paypal dispute, you couldn't reopen it. The seller would ignore you as soon as you've closed the dispute.
Is there something similar for chargebacks? Is it a bad idea to cancel my chargeback request now that the merchant has changed their tune?
Edit: Thanks for everyone's opinions. I think the consensus is clear. I will do my best to return the item and remember to have tracking/signature. And I will proceed with my bank with the charge back unless my bank advises otherwise. Thinking about it, I think I defintely trust the bank more than the merchant lol.
Scam scam scam scam scam.
Don't cancel your chargeback until you have your refund in your bank account.