Hello revered OzBargain community,
No, I'm not asking for advice on how to invest $500,000 or whether I should put myself into debt by buying an $80,000 car to impress work colleagues… this is far more important!
A good friend/housemate of mine (let's call him Durian) was planning a social tennis game with friends. Durian realised at the last moment however, he did not have access to his racquet, which was unfortunately situated in the leafy suburbs of Dingley Village, some 45-60 minutes away. As a friend and housemate, I felt the urge to help him out of a pickle, and offered for him to use my racquet. For full disclosure, the strings on this racquet were quite worn, but still functioning as strings should.
Durian proceeded to use my racquet for one night a week, for approx. 2-3 weeks, until… disaster struck! He broke a string, and I found myself in a Larry David-esque moral dilemma.
One one hand, Durian is a good friend, the strings were aging and it was bad luck that the string broke.
Playing devil's advocate, by intending to help Durian I've suffered loss and become at a disadvantage.
So my question is, should Durian be responsible for re-stringing my racquet, or as I suspect, is it my obligation as an ethical friend to let it slide?
EDIT/UPDATE
As expected, it's a landslide that Durian is not responsible for the re-string. Good to get it sanity checked that smelly Durian isn't having one over me.
However, a third poll option to consider; would it be reasonable (assuming I pay for the re-stringing) to expect Durian to complete the logistical exercise of taking the racquet to the store, as a token gesture and show of good faith for breaking the string? What a world we live in.
Clearly he should buy you a new racket, pay you a restocking fee, buy you a car and a house, and be your butler for life. Anything less and he is getting one over for you.
Next moral dilemma: Peanut Butter or Vegemite?! I feel like the Vegemite is getting one over me.