A few recent posts of mine got 'Comment score below threshold' and i'm at a loss to understand why.
Is there something i'm totally missing, or are comment votes really pointless?
I'd have thought that a neg on a comment would fit if the comment added no useful discussion, information or relevance to the deal, or as a way to bury a comment attacking another user or comment without good reason.
Recent example was i me querying why a free sim card was a deal as i'd never paid for one in the past and thought that to be common practice.
Keep in mind it was a genuine query, and i had NOT negged the deal.
A completely legitimate question i thought, yet i return to find it negged 19 times.
So after crying for an hour and getting a hug from mom i came here to rant….. no not really i don't care that much.
My real concern given how widespread and vicious the practise is, how many useful questions and comments are missed because they have been needlessly negged below threshold?
I think it's something that could use some looking at, maybe similar rules should apply to the comments as they do to the deals, and thus people would need a good reason to neg a post.
Just some thoughts.
Me, personally, would just hate to miss usefull posts… thats all.
I think it's a bit of a pack mentality.